The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

LONDON, WC2A 1EN, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7440 9950
Fax:
Fax 020 7430 2818
Email:
Web:
www.33cllaw.com

London Bar

Set overviews: England and Wales

33 Chancery Lane is ‘a very strong’ set for white collar crime and POCA instructions. The clerks’ room is ‘hardworking and always deliver very suitable solutions to problems’. Practice director Martin Adams is ‘a marvellous clerk and extremely helpful’. Deputy practice manager Chris Chiles and second deputy Oliver Carroll ‘can never do enough to make you feel welcome and important to chambers’. Offices in: London

[back to top]



London Bar

Business and regulatory crime (including global investigations)
Business and regulatory crime (including global investigations) - Leading sets - ranked: tier 3

33 Chancery Lane

Noted for being 'very strong in financial crime', 33 Chancery Lane has established strength in proceeds of crime cases, while on the business crime side, the group's recent workload includes Serious Fraud Office (SFO) investigations and corruption cases. Amanda Pinto QC defended a former Barclays rate submitter against the SFO concerning alleged manipulation of her submissions to the calculation of Euribor; the defendant was acquitted.

Leading Silks

Mark Rainsford QC - 33 Chancery LaneExceptionally hardworking with an instinctive approach to cases.

Ranked: tier 1

Graham Brodie QC - 33 Chancery LaneAn advocate with great gravitas.

Ranked: tier 2

Andrew Mitchell QC - 33 Chancery LaneA very user-friendly silk.

Ranked: tier 3

Amanda Pinto QC - 33 Chancery LaneA heavyweight advocate.

Ranked: tier 3
Leading Juniors

Christopher Convey - 33 Chancery LaneDiligent and client-focused.

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Fraud: civil
Leading Juniors

Ian Smith - 33 Chancery LaneA go-to junior; suitably cautious and painstaking in getting the evidence right for freezer applications and pleadings, which always pays dividends.

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Fraud: crime
Leading Silks

Andrew Mitchell QC - 33 Chancery LaneA very accessible silk.

Ranked: tier 3

Graham Brodie QC - 33 Chancery LaneHe has a searing intellect.

Ranked: tier 3
Leading Juniors

Keith Mitchell - 33 Chancery LaneHe is excellent before a jury.

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Proceeds of Crime Act and asset forfeiture
Proceeds of Crime Act and asset forfeiture - Leading sets - ranked: tier 1

33 Chancery Lane

'Very strong' set 33 Chancery Lane is 'a leader in POCA proceedings', housing a group of barristers with 'a wealth of experience', according to instructing solicitors. In a prominent highlight for the set, Kennedy Talbot QC is representing the Serious Fraud Office in the Commercial Court regarding the enforcement of a confiscation order worth over £66m against Gerald Smith, who was convicted of fraud in 2006.

Leading Silks

Andrew Mitchell QC - 33 Chancery LaneA leading authority on POCA matters.

Ranked: tier 1

Graham Brodie QC - 33 Chancery LaneA silk with a prodigious intellect.

Ranked: tier 2

Kennedy Talbot QC - 33 Chancery LaneUnflappable, measured and logical.

Ranked: tier 2

Mark Rainsford QC - 33 Chancery LaneA brilliant strategist.

Ranked: tier 2

Martin Evans QC - 33 Chancery LaneHis practice covers the full range of POCA matters.

Ranked: tier 3
Leading Juniors

Barry Stancombe - 33 Chancery LaneAn accomplished advocate with first-rate analytical skills.

Ranked: tier 1

Christopher Convey - 33 Chancery LaneNoted for representing third-party interests in complex confiscation and recovery proceedings.

Ranked: tier 1

Fiona Jackson - 33 Chancery LaneA very hardworking barrister who exudes charm.

Ranked: tier 2

Ian Smith - 33 Chancery LaneHe combines detailed advice with commercial understanding.

Ranked: tier 2

Penelope Small - 33 Chancery LaneVery experienced in asset confiscation and recovery cases.

Ranked: tier 2

Catherine Collins - 33 Chancery LaneNoted for her experience in asset recovery cases.

Ranked: tier 3

Faisal Osman - 33 Chancery LaneAn indefatigable and charming junior.

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Set overviews: England and Wales

33 Chancery Lane is ‘a very strong’ set for white collar crime and POCA instructions. The clerks’ room is ‘hardworking and always deliver very suitable solutions to problems’. Practice director Martin Adams is ‘a marvellous clerk and extremely helpful’. Deputy practice manager Chris Chiles and second deputy Oliver Carroll ‘can never do enough to make you feel welcome and important to chambers’. Offices in: London

[back to top]


Further information on 33 Chancery Lane (33 Chancery Lane)

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about 33 Chancery Lane (33 Chancery Lane) in other jurisdictions.

London Bar

Offices in London

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has  ‘previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules’,  the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11). 
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS – CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal. The  explanatory notes  to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the  Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002  (“the 2002 Act”). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.