Mr Douglas Campbell > Chambers of Andrew Waugh QC > London, England > Lawyer Profile
Chambers of Andrew Waugh QC Offices
Three New Square
3 NEW SQUARE, LINCOLN'S INN
- Go to...
Mr Douglas Campbell
Barrister specialising in all aspects of intellectual property and information technology law. Silk 2016, Appointed Recorder in 2010, Deputy High Court Judge in 2015. Former member of Attorney-General’s Panel of Junior Counsel, 2010-2015.Has acted for many leading companies in the electronics, telecommunications, chemical, pharmaceutical, technology, consumer products and other industries. Recent UK cases include Freshasia Foods v Lu  EWHC 638 (Ch) (confidential information, restrictive covenants) Frank v Nike  EWHC 1893 (Ch),  EWCA Civ 497 (trade mark, interim injunction, social media); AP Racing v Alcon Components  EWCA Civ 1420 (patent); Cantel Medical v Arc  EWHC 345 (Pat) (patent, medical devices, designs); London Taxi v Frazer Nash  FSR 7, CA (shape trade mark); Icescape v Ice World  EWHC 42 (patent, threats); Moet Hennessey v Polistas  EWHC 3114 (“Veuve Clicquot” trade mark); Comic v Fox  FSR 31, CA (validity of a series of trade marks);  FSR 30, CA (trade mark infringement); Teva v Boehringer Ingelheim  EWHC 2963 (patent, pharmaceuticals); Warner-Lambert v Actavis  EWHC 72 (Pat); Phil & Ted’s Most Excellent Buggy Co v TFK Trends for Kids  EWCA Civ 469,  EWPCC 21 (patent); Comic Enterprise v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation  ETMR 51,  FSR 35, ‘Glee’ television programme (trade mark and passing off); Danisco v Novozymes  EWHC 3288, CA,  EWHC 483 (patent, judgment rate interest); Vector v Glatt  EWCA Civ 805, CA (added matter, patent); Coflexip v Stena Offshore  FSR 34, CA (estoppel, damages); Stena v Irish Ferries  RPC 668, CA (special defences to patent infringement); Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard  FSR 34 16, CA (employee’s duties); Dyson v Qualtex  RPC 31, CA (design right); Compensation Specialists v Compensation Claims Service  EWCA Civ 1108, CA (franchising); D Green & Co v Regalzone  ETMR 22, CA (descriptive use of trade marks); Thermos v Aladdin  FSR 11 (CA) (registered design).
Called 1993, Inner Temple; contributing author to 16th, 17th & 18th Editions of‘Terrell on Patents’ (Sweet & Maxwell, 2006,2011,2016).
IP Bar Association; Chancery Bar Association.
Dollar Academy, Dollar; Hertford College, Oxford (1988 First Class Hons with Distinction in Quantum Chemistry); City University, London (1992 Diploma in Law with Distinction); Inner Temple Major scholarship. Pegasus Scholar to Mallesons Stephen Jacques, Melbourne, Australia, in 1996.
London Bar > IT and telecomsWithin: IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - Leading Silks -
London Bar > Intellectual propertyWithin: Leading Silks -
Three New Square is a ‘pre-eminent IP set‘ which ‘stands out for its service levels‘ and includes ‘go-to barristers for difficult patent cases‘ across all areas of technology; members are also well versed in trade mark and passing off litigation and copyright and design right matters, particularly in fashion, music, entertainment, and literature. In recent work highlights, Tom Mitcheson QC appeared in the Supreme Court in a high-profile dispute between Warner-Lambert against Actavis relating to Warner-Lambert’s painkiller, Lyrica. Meanwhile, in the Court of Appeal, Joe Delaney successfully represented Regeneron in a patent dispute against Kymab concerning the breeding and use by Kymab of genetically modified mice for the production of human antibodies. In trade mark litigation, Douglas Campbell QC was instructed by Frank Industries in an infringement claim brought against Nike.