The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of Christopher Rees

20 CATHEDRAL ROAD, CARDIFF, CF11 9LJ, WALES
Tel:
Work 029 2023 2032
Fax:
Fax 029 2023 3636
DX:
141874 CARDIFF-28
Email:
Web:
www.apexchambers.net

Regional Bar: Wales and Chester Circuit

Crime

Apex Chambers is home to a strong contingent of criminal advocates, with members appearing in some of the region's most notable cases for all parties. Of recent note, Christopher Rees defended former Commonwealth Games swimmer Otto Putland, who was acquitted of rape.

Leading Silks

Jonathan Elystan Rees QC - Apex ChambersActive in a wide range of criminal cases.

Ranked: tier 1
Leading Juniors

Christopher Rees - Apex ChambersRecommended for very high costs cases.

Ranked: tier 1

Clair Wilks - Apex ChambersParticularly experienced in sexual offences cases.

Ranked: tier 2

John Ryan - Apex ChambersKey areas of practice include drug conspiracies, violence, and sexual offences.

Ranked: tier 2

Lucy Crowther - Apex ChambersA careful and competent advocate.

Ranked: tier 2

Ruth Smith - Apex ChambersSpecialises in cases involving vulnerable witnesses.

Ranked: tier 2

Nicholas Gedge - Apex ChambersHis practice includes violent, sexual, and drug-related offences.

Ranked: tier 3

Susan Ferrier - Apex ChambersRecommended for complex conspiracy cases.

Ranked: tier 3

Timothy Evans - Apex ChambersFraud and drug offences make up key elements of his practice.

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Leading Sets
Leading Sets - ranked: tier 2

Apex Chambers

[back to top]

Regulatory, health and safety, and licensing

Apex Chambers' regulatory team is instructed on disciplinary hearings and regulatory prosecutions, including health and safety matters. Lee Reynolds recently prosecuted in what was referred to by trading standards as Operation Gleam, which concerned the sale of illegal teeth whitening products with a hydrogen peroxide content of up to more than one hundred times the legal limit.

Leading Juniors

Lee Reynolds - Apex ChambersParticularly experienced in consumer protection matters.

Ranked: tier 1

Alexander Greenwood - Apex ChambersPredominantly instructed to prosecute regulatory offences.

Ranked: tier 2

Nicholas Gedge - Apex ChambersRecommended for disciplinary work in the medical sector.

Ranked: tier 2

[back to top]


Further information on Apex Chambers (Chambers of Christopher Rees)

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Apex Chambers (Chambers of Christopher Rees) in other jurisdictions.

Regional Bar

Offices in Cardiff

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has  ‘previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules’,  the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11). 
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS – CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal. The  explanatory notes  to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the  Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002  (“the 2002 Act”). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.