The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of James Goudie QC and Daniel Stilitz QC

Living Wage
11 KING'S BENCH WALK, TEMPLE, LONDON, EC4Y 7EQ, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7632 8500
Fax:
Fax 020 7583 9123
DX:
368 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Email:
Web:
www.11kbw.com

Marcus Pilgerstorfer

Tel:
Work 020 7632 8500
Email:
11KBW (Chambers of James Goudie QC and Daniel Stilitz QC)

Position

Marcus specialises in employment and discrimination, product liability and public law. Recent case highlights include: Batang Kali judicial review (pending, SC); Hainsworth v MoD (pending SC), Burrell v Micheldever (2014, CA), Met Police v Keohane (2014, EAT), Portnykh v Nomura (2013, EAT), Edwards v Chesterfield (2012, SC); English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds (2009, CA). As well as unitary claims, Marcus’ product liability work has included the PIP Breast Implant Group Litigation, DePuy Pinnacle Metal on Metal Hip Group Litigation, Mix-Match Hip Litigation and the Sabril Group Litigation. Marcus has also drafted private members’ bills including that which resulted in the enactment of the Gangmasters (Licensing) Act 2004. For a full profile please see the 11kbw website.

Career

Called 2002; Gray’s Inn; Attorney General’s B Panel since 2014.

Languages

English (native); German.

Member

DLA; ELA; ELBA; EELA; ILS; EuSoCo Research Group; Common Core of European Private Law Product Liability Research Group; Product Liability Forum of BIICL.

Education

St John’s College, Oxford University (2001 MA English Law with German Law, 1st).


London Bar

Employment

Within: Leading Juniors

Marcus Pilgerstorfer - 11KBW ‘ Super bright, very academic and a great intellect yet very approachable. ’

[back to top]

Product liability

Within: Leading Juniors

Marcus Pilgerstorfer - 11KBW ‘ Bright and dependable; a real talent. ’

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments by:
11KBW (Chambers of James Goudie QC and Daniel Stilitz QC)

  • Possession Proceedings 28 August 2012

    The lower courts continue to clarify the position following the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45; [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18 on the application of Article 8 ECHR to defend possession proceedings.
    - 11KBW

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to