The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Work 020 7353 8415
Fax 020 7353 7622
Francis Taylor Building, Charles Merrett, London, ENGLAND

Charles Merrett

Work 020 7353 8415
Francis Taylor Building (Francis Taylor Building)

Work Department

  • Planning and Environment;
  • Compulsory Purchase and Compensation;
  • Rating and Valuation;
  • Infrastructure;
  • Rights of Ways and Highways;
  • Licensing;
  • Public Law and Local Government.


Planning and Environmental Law

During pupillage, Charles gained experience in a wide array of planning matters. He has assisted in relation to planning inquiries, local plan examinations and enforcement inquiries. Charles assisted with the drafting of advices on matters such as:

The correct interpretation of a planning permission;

  • Certificates of Use;
  • Use Classes;
  • Permitted Development;
  • Minerals and Energy;
  • Planning conditions;
  • Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas;
  • The interpretation of the NPPF (2018);
  • Environmental Impact Assessments;
  • Habitats.

Charles has a keen interest in issues that arise alongside the development of land. During pupillage, he advised on contractual matters such as misrepresentation and damages, and tortious liability, especially with regards to claims in nuisance. In particular, Charles gained significant experience in relation to matters concerning the restriction of use of land, and has advised on restrictive covenants, repairing covenants, adverse possession and prescriptive easements.

Charles also assisted in the drafting of grounds to both the High Court and Court of Appeal in a number of planning matters, including the grant of advertising consent and enforcement.

Planning Inquiries

Charles assisted with a number of planning inquiries during the course of pupillage, in which he helped draft opening and closing submissions and research specific areas in dispute. The inquiries that Charles helped with included:

  • A 4-day inquiry for a mixed-use extra-care development;
  • An 8-day inquiry for a new hotel and office development in the centre of London;
  • An 8-day inquiry for development of up to 121 homes.

He also gained experience assisting and advising on enforcement matters, including helping with the drafting of grounds of appeal to the Court of Appeal for a case arising from successful action from a local authority.


Whilst under the supervision of Suzanne Ornsby QC, Charles assisted with a number of local plan examinations. This included advising on the legality of a sustainability appraisal, answering inspector’s questions and providing a written opinion on the impact of the revised NPPF (2018) for the delivery and supply of housing.

Compulsory Purchase and Compensation

Charles has a strong interest in compulsory purchase and compensation matters, having gained experience of compulsory purchase from not only the perspective of the acquiring authority, but also of individuals objecting to an order and landowners seeking compensation subsequent to the compulsory purchase of their land.

During pupillage he researched and advised on a broad array of matters including:

The application of the compensation code, in particular the assessment of compensation under s. 5 of the Land Compensation Act 1961;

The correct basis for valuation of land purchased from a landowner in which it was argued by the acquiring authority that the land had nil-value due to a lack of market comparables alongside the no-scheme principle. This case resulted in a settlement substantially higher than the valuation suggested by the authority.

The formulation of an objection to a compulsory purchase order which required significant alterations in order to suitably protect the interests of the landowner.

Rating and Valuation

Whilst under the supervision of Cain Ormondroyd, Charles assisted with a number of matters relating to business rates. These included:

The correct approach to the identification of the hereditament, following the decision of Woolway v Mazars;

The scope of the meaning of “material change in circumstances” when considering the extent of business rates liability;

Charles also gained experience of more general land valuation matters, including assisting with a probate case in the Upper Tribunal in which the main issue was the valuation of property. He welcomes instructions in any cases which raise issues of business rates and / or land valuation.


Charles is interested in infrastructure projects and helped research and advise on a number of matters including Transport and Works Act Orders and Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.

Rights of Way and Highways

Whilst under the supervision of Ned Westaway, Charles assisted with a number of matters relating to both private and public rights of way. These included:

Researching matters relating to the definitive map, including definitive map modification orders;

The extinguishment of highways, including permanent stopping up. Charles helped research and draft grounds on the potential extinguishment of a public highway due to the

Applications for Traffic Regulation Orders, gaining experience of both applications for TROs and objections to them.

Furthermore, Charles gained experience of a number of public highway inquiries, including a complex 3-day inquiry into the simultaneous extinguishment and creation of a public right of way in Kent.


Charles has helped research and advise on a number of licensing matters, including prosecutions for breach of a licence, the legality of a transfer of a premises licence and its impact on an ongoing licensing appeal, and appeals relating to the alteration or removal of a premises licence.

Public Law and Local Government

Charles has a keen interest in broad public law cases and principles, including cases giving rise to issues relating to human rights. He has helped advise on a number of broad public law matters including legitimate expectation, the legality of resolutions made by local authorities, the procedural requirements imposed upon a local authority and the correct interpretation of legislation in the Divisional Court. Charles welcomes instructions in cases raising such issues.



  • Oxford University, Philosophy and Theology (2.i) 2014
  • City University, (Distinction) GDL 2015
  • City Universty, (Very Competent) BPTC 2016 

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • CommuniquĂ© on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft CommuniquĂ© on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the CommuniquĂ© on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ CommuniquĂ© ”), on October 3, 2019. The CommuniquĂ© entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.