The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Harcourt Chambers

Chambers of Nick Goodwin QC

Work 0844 561 7135
Fax 01865 791585
96453 OXFORD 4
London, Oxford

Regional Bar: South Eastern Circuit

Family and children law

Specialist family set Harcourt Chambers is well-known for its wide range of 'formidable advocates' at all levels of call. The set covers every aspect of family work, but is particularly formidable in high-value matrimonial finance and complex public law children work. Members have recently appeared in high-profile cases concerning fabricated/induced injury, sexual abuse, international abduction and undisclosed assets, among many others. Previously the head of chambers, Francis Judd QC has been elevated to the Family Division of the High Court.

Leading Silks

Aidan Vine QC - Harcourt ChambersA good strategic thinker with excellent attention to detail and client care.

Ranked: tier 1

Damian Garrido QC - Harcourt ChambersA leading expert on international children law.

Ranked: tier 1

John Vater QC - Harcourt ChambersA real trooper: he has guts and will fight for his clients.

Ranked: tier 1

Nick Goodwin QC - Harcourt ChambersA tenacious and meticulous counsel with superb knowledge of children and family law

Ranked: tier 1
Leading Juniors

Jane Campbell - Harcourt ChambersA tenacious negotiator who empathises with clients.

Ranked: tier 1

Sara Granshaw - Harcourt ChambersGives pragmatic and sensible advice.

Ranked: tier 1

Simon Miller - Harcourt ChambersAn experienced, well-prepared and forensic advocate.

Ranked: tier 1

Alex Forbes - Harcourt ChambersThorough, knowledgeable and an excellent advocate.

Ranked: tier 2

Cecilia Barrett - Harcourt ChambersStraight-talking and down-to-earth; develops a good rapport with clients.

Ranked: tier 2

Emily Rayner - Harcourt ChambersAn unflappable advocate who instills confidence in clients.

Ranked: tier 2

Edward Kirkwood - Harcourt ChambersHis eye for detail is second-to-none.

Ranked: tier 2

Fiona Hay - Harcourt ChambersRecommended for high-value financial remedy cases

Ranked: tier 2

Johnathan Sampson - Harcourt ChambersA safe pair of hands with a reassuring manner with clients

Ranked: tier 2

Jason Green - Harcourt ChambersAdept at handling both finance and children matters.

Ranked: tier 2

Louise Potter - Harcourt ChambersA go-to junior for sensitive cases.

Ranked: tier 2

Douglas Allen - Harcourt ChambersParticularly recommended for settlement negotiations.

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Leading Sets
Leading Sets - ranked: tier 2

Harcourt Chambers

[back to top]

Further information on Harcourt Chambers (Chambers of Nick Goodwin QC)

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Harcourt Chambers (Chambers of Nick Goodwin QC) in other jurisdictions.

London Bar

Offices in London

Regional Bar

Offices in Oxford

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has  ‘previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules’,  the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11). 
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal. The  explanatory notes  to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the  Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002  (“the 2002 Act”). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.