The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of Oliver Blunt QC & Sally O'Neill QC

32 FURNIVAL STREET, LONDON, EC4A 1JQ, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7405 3232
Fax:
Fax 020 7405 3322
DX:
72 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Email:
Web:
www.furnivalchambers.co.uk

Sophie O'Sullivan

Tel:
Work 0207 405 32 32
Email:
Web:
furnivalchambers.co.uk/barrister/sophie-osullivan/
Furnival Chambers (Chambers of Oliver Blunt QC & Sally O'Neill QC)

Position

Barrister

Career

Sophie’s practice encompasses all areas of criminal law, primarily defending, as a led junior and junior alone.

Since joining Chambers in 2013 Sophie has appeared in multi-handed murder and conspiracy to murder trials, complex multi-handed fraud and financial offences cases, as well as allegations of conspiracy to supply Class A drugs and the most serious sexual offences.

Sophie is currently instructed to defend an individual charged with the murder of his mother; as a junior alone representing one of twenty-five defendants said to have been part of a 5 year large-scale conspiracy to fraudulently import tobacco and cigarettes into the UK; and, as junior alone, a defendant charged together with others in a £500,000 money laundering conspiracy.

Aside from crime, Sophie also has a busy regulatory practice. She frequently appears before the Nursing and Midwifery Council, Health Care Professionals Council, and the General Pharmaceutical Council representing nurses, midwives, pharmacists social workers and other professionals facing allegations of professional misconduct and/or lack of competence. Sophie acts for registrants at all stages of  the proceedings from interim orders to final hearings and reviews.

Sophie was appointed to the CPS Panel of Advocates at Grade 1 in 2015

RECENT CRIMINAL CASES:

R v RS (Central Criminal Court) 2018 - Led by Oliver Blunt QC, Sophie is currently defending in a multi-handed murder trial.

R v RL (Maidstone Crown Court) 2017 – Sophie defended as a led junior in a multi-handed high value car-ringing conspiracy which involved complex analysis of evidence particularly in relation to covert surveillance, prison audio recordings and cell site analysis.

R v AA (Cambridge Crown Court) 2016 – As a junior alone Sophie successfully defended a young man charged with grievous bodily harm with intent having been accused of repeatedly stabbing the victim in the chest and stomach. Following legal argument relating to the admissibility of the Defendant’s police interviews the Crown offered no evidence.

R v RY (Birmingham Crown Court) 2016 – Sophie appeared as a led junior in Birmingham Crown Court in the successful defence of man charged with conspiracy to murder. The proceedings required meticulous examination of the Crown’s disclosure process and volumes of unused material which precipitated complex disclosure arguments. Following upon 7 weeks of disclosure argument the prosecution discontinued their case against the defendant.

R v BG (Wolverhampton Crown Court) 2016 – Led by Oliver Blunt QC, successfully advancing a submission of no case to answer at the close of the prosecution case to an allegation of grievous bodily harm with intent on the basis that the Crown are unable to prove that the Defendant’s actions, even if proved, were causative of the Complainant’s injuries – other potential events could not be excluded as being the sole cause of the head injuries, therefore causation could not be established.

R v JT (Aylesbury Crown Court) 2016 – Successful defence of the first of two defendants charged with joint enterprise actual bodily harm where it was alleged that the Defendant used a metal pole to beat the Complainant to the ground, causing a fractured skull. The Defendant accepted presence but successfully advanced the defence of self defence.

R v CD (Southampton Crown Court) 2016 – Led by Jeremy Carter-Manning QC securing the acquittal of the Defendant who was charged with rape. The case required careful scrutiny and examination of complex forensic and toxicological evidence, the issue in the case being that of consent and/or belief in consent.

R v EC (Aylesbury Crown Court) 2016 – Successful defence of an allegation of sexual assault said to have been carried out by a mental health nurse upon a colleague whilst on duty at work.

R v TA (Wood Green Crown Court 2016) – Sophie secured the acquittal a defendant accused of dwelling burglary where the prosecution evidence was CCTV footage and the alleged positive ‘recognition’ identification of the defendant by 3 police officers having viewed the CCTV stills.

R v A (Aylesbury Crown Court) 2015 - Acting as junior alone secured the acquittal of a defendant charged with grievous bodily harm. Successful advancement of the defence that person(s) unknown must have caused the grave injuries to the Complainant in the period of time after leaving the company of the Defendant and being discovered by passers-by on the road.

R v C (Kingston Crown Court) 2015 -  Representing one of two defendants, secured the acquittal of the Defendant charged with possession with intent to supply 1.3kg of cannabis (and acquittal of simple possession in the alternative). Successful advancement of the defence that the Defendant did not know the drugs and paraphernalia found in her kitchen cupboard where she lived alone with her young children were there. The co-defendant was convicted.

R v C & Others (Central Criminal Court) 2014 – 2015: Led by Lisa Wilding QC as Second Junior for the Crown in the successful prosecution of 4 men, all of whom were convicted of double murder following a complex 3 month trial which involved substantial analysis of cell site and forensic evidence, particularly in relation to phone ‘co-location’ and the varied mechanisms of blood deposition.

R v H (Court of Appeal Criminal Division) 2014: Successfully granted leave to appeal sentence before the full court following a renewed application on the question of whether a determinative sentence of imprisonment may lawfully run consecutive to an extended determinative sentence under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, as amended by the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.

 

RECENT REGULATORY CASES: 

NMC v LH (Nursing and Midwifery Council) 2018: Sophie secured a finding of no impairment in relation to a newly qualified midwife, despite comprehensive factual admissions in relation to wide ranging allegations of lack of competence which precipiated her summary dismissal by her Trust employer.

NMC v GN 
(Nursing and Midwifery Council) 2017: Sophie appeared on behalf of a prison nurse who was accused of multiple clinical failings arising in the hours before the prisoner died of an overdose. All facts were found not proved.

NMC v SA (Nursing and Midwifery Council) 2017: Sophie secured a 1 year Caution Order for the Registrant following a fully contested hearing where the facts found proved included physical and emotional mistreatment of the patient under her care.

GPHC v LR (General Pharmaceutical Council) 2017: Secured a 6 month Conditions of Practice Order for a pharmacist who had admitted lack of competence across broad core areas of practice over an 18 month period in circumstances where at the time of the Final Hearing the Registrant had been out of work for nearly 3 years. The case had specific health features and required particular sensitivity throughout the proceedings.

HCPC v CH (Health Care Professions Council) 2017: Sophie secured a 6 month suspension order for a practitioner who had findings of protracted dishonesty against her as well as misconduct in relation to clinical errors over a 7 month period.

NMC v MAS (Nursing and Midwifery Council)  2016: Secured the minimum 1 year Caution Order at the outcome of a trial where it was accepted by the Registrant that but for her error in the administration of the relevant medicine to the patient he would not have died.

HCPC v DB  (Nursing and Midwifery Council) 2015: Successful submission of no case to answer at both the factual and misconduct stages. Facts found not proved on 3 charges Misconduct not found on any of the 12 charges.

NMC v NC (Nursing and Midwifery Council)  2015: Secured a Caution Order at the outcome of proceedings for a registrant who had been found to have dishonestly concealed from her employer the NMC referral and investigation. 5 further charges found not proved.



Member

Lincoln's Inn;  Criminal Bar Association

Education

Called to the Bar 2011

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017

    The following information relates to the enactment of The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017 (" DPL "), which was expected to come into force on 29 January 2019, will now come into force in September 2019. The DPL will regulate the future processing of all personal data in the Cayman Islands.
  • The Mutual Funds Law (2019 Revision)

    The following information relates to the enactment of The Mutual Funds Law (2019 Revision) and the subsequent commencement of related sections of The Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law 2015. The changes require certain funds to notify the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority if they are active in EU jurisdictions.
  • Stuarts Success - Case Review: Toby -v- Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company

    Toby –v- Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, FSD 152 of 2013 (IMJ), Judgment delivered on 29 August 2018
  • Security Token Offerings in the Cayman Islands

    Security Token Offerings (“STOs”) are an extremely popular means of fundraising for new projects and utilise blockchain technology to do so. Whilst no specific legislation has been passed by the Cayman Islands Government in connection with STOs and cryptocurrencies, it would be incorrect to say that STOs are “unregulated”.
  • "BLACK FRIDAY" - NOW FREELY USABLE FOR PROMOTIONS IN AUSTRIA

    Black Friday is unquestionable one of the most profitable and busiest days of the year for retail, particularly online. Worldwide almost all online store do offer sales or special promotions on Black Friday or Cyber Monday. Already after this practice has established online, a trademark for " BLACK FRIDAY " was registered in Germany back in 2013. In 2016 a Chinese company acquired the trademark and then filed in 2017 for its extension to Austria. Based on the registered trademark, it granted exclusive rights to an Austrian company, which licensed usage rights to various partner stores against remuneration. Further, an exclusive " Black Friday-Cooperation Program " was established. Non-partners who used the event name or trademark were prosecuted and requested to either pay a license fee or refrain from running Black Friday promotions. Some followed the request and entered into license agreements. Some, however, did challenge the validity of the trademark. Finally, respective proceedings to check the actual protection of the trademark were initiated. Austrian courts now held that the trademark " BLACK FRIDAY " is not protected in Austria .
    - Dorda
  • The Zero Carbon Bill - a closer look

    ​​​​The long-awaited "Zero Carbon Bill" was finally released on 9 May, but despite being greeted by considerable media interest there are a number of significant issues that have yet to come to the fore.
  • A link tax in New Zealand?

    ​​​​A controversial payment to publishers for content in Europe has implications for New Zealand – despite escaping mention in a recent paper that set out the key issues for review for our own copyright laws.
  • News media exemption under the Privacy Act: now a matter of "responsibility"?

    The role of the news media as the "eyes and ears" of the public, and the corresponding right of such news media to be exempted from the Privacy Act 1993 ( Privacy Act ), is entrenched and well accepted. However, the extent to which the news media exemption applies to non-traditional forms of "news" published by "civilian journalists", such as online commentary and blogs, is a hotly debated subject.
  • Quarterly Update on Trade Defense Cases in Turkey (June 2019)

    The authority to initiate dumping or subsidy examinations, upon complaint or, where necessary, ex officio , has been given from the Ministry of Economy to the Ministry of Trade ("Ministry"). Within the scope of this authority, the Ministry announces its decisions with the communiqués published on the Official Gazette.
  • Company Formations - A jurisdictional guide to setting up a business

    The following article contains the Foreword in the IR Global Virtual Series brochure on 'Company Formations - A jurisdictional guide to setting up a business'.