Yasmin Yasseri > Chambers of Adrian Keeling KC and Jonathan Jones KC > London, England > Barrister Profile

Chambers of Adrian Keeling KC and Jonathan Jones KC
No5 Barristers' Chambers
Fifth Floor, 7 Savoy Court
London
WC2R 0EX
England

Email firm Visit website 0845 210 5555 020 7900 1582

Set Profile
Go to...

0845 210 5555 clerks@no5.com View profile View profile View profile

Work Department

Business and Property

Position

Barrister in the Business and Property Group at No5 Barristers’ Chambers.

Career

Yasmin is a commercial and financial law specialist. She has a busy practice that spans all aspects of advisory work, drafting and litigation in the fields of company, LLP and partnership law, corporate restructuring and insolvency, bankruptcy, banking, financial services, professional negligence and civil fraud. She is sought-after for her technical ability and for her commercial and pragmatic approach to client issues.

Yasmin was appointed as a Recorder (South Eastern Circuit, Family) in 2020.

Notable Cases include:

KKIG UK Limited v Triload Invest SRO [2020] EWHC 2703 (Ch)

Little v Bloomsbury Law Solicitors [2019] EWHC 3510 (Ch)
Re Diamond Hangar Ltd [2019] EWHC 224 (Ch)
Lisa Walton and Thomas Walton v Shan Allman [2015] EWHC 3325 (Ch)
Michael Hunt v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 1094 (TC)
SafetyNet Security v Freedom Security and Coppage [2013] EWCA Civ 1176

Languages

Persian

Memberships

Chancery Bar Association (Member of Equality and Diversity sub-committee);

Midlands Chancery & Commercial Bar Association

Education

MA (Cantab) Law;

LLM (London) Corporate and Commercial Law

Lawyer Rankings

Regional Bar > Midland Circuit > Commercial litigation

(Leading Juniors)Ranked: Tier 2

Yasmin Yasseri – No5 Barristers’ Chambers ‘Yasmin has great attention to detail and can give sound practical advice. She is excellent with clients and can put them at ease.’

Regional Bar > Midland Circuit > Company and insolvency

(Leading Juniors)Ranked: Tier 1

Yasmin Yasseri – No5 Barristers’ Chambers ‘Yasmin prepares meticulously and powerfully in court. She always seems to have the right answer, even when there seems not to be one. Her advocacy style is appreciated by judges.’