Danny Bazini > Chambers of Adrian Keeling KC and Jonathan Jones KC > Birmingham, England > Lawyer Profile
No5 Barristers' Chambers Offices
No5 Barristers' Chambers
FOUNTAIN COURT, STEELHOUSE LANE
- Go to...
Danny has specialised in all areas of immigration, asylum, human rights, EU free movement and nationality law since 1992. He appears in the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal, High Courts, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. Judicial review work is a strong part of his practice. Danny is experienced in public and administrative law generally and has undertaken work in the fields of mental health, education, extradition, prison and regulatory law – in particular where there is an immigration slant. In the past Danny has worked, volunteered and acted as a trainer for the Immigration Advisory Service and provides training and seminars to solicitors, law centres and community groups. Danny is ranked as a leading junior in Immigration and Nationality Law in both ‘The Legal 500’ and ‘Chambers and Partners’. Notable Cases include: Ahmed Mahad and others v ECO  UKSC 16; AR and FW, R (on the application of) v SSHD (Rev 1)  EWCA Civ 1310; DA (Columbia) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 682; LL (China) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 617; SSHD v AHK & Ors  EWCA Civ 287; JN (Cameroon) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 307; Jamal v SSHD  EWHC 1854 (Admin); MW (Liberia) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 1376; Ooi & Ors v SSHD  EWHC 3221 (Admin); FD (Zimbabwe) v SSHD  EWCA 1220; MT (Zimbabwe) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 455.
BA (Econ); BA (Law).
Lawyer Rankings(Leading Juniors)Ranked: Tier 3
A ‘strong immigration practice‘ with ‘expertise in most areas‘ of immigration and asylum law, No5 Barristers’ Chambers acts for clients including vulnerable individuals and refugees in the full range of appeals and claims. In Yilmaz v SSHD, Manjit Singh Gill KC appeared before the Lord Chief Justice on a case concerning Home Office breach of duty of candour in relation to out-of-country video link hearings. Practice group head Danny Bazini, meanwhile, led Jessica Smeaton and Ramby De Mello on significant deportation appeals HA (Iraq) v SSHD and RA (Iraq) v SSHD.