Nathan Pillow QC > Essex Court Chambers > London, England > Lawyer Profile
Essex Court Chambers Offices
Essex Court Chambers
24 LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS
- Go to...
Nathan Pillow QC
Specialises in commercial dispute resolution. Practises in the English courts at all levels, and before international arbitral tribunals of all varieties. Extensive experience of working on heavy and complex cases, as part of a team made up of solicitors, foreign lawyers and/or other counsel; but equally at home acting alone, both as an advocate and in an advisory context. Particular interest in and experience of cases involving civil fraud, including injunctive and other interim relief; equitable, proprietary and restitutionary claims and remedies; and tracing and asset recovery. Work generally has an international character and often involves complex jurisdictional and conflict of laws issues.
Called 1997, Gray’s Inn; Essex Court Chambers 1998; Silk 2015.
French (near fluent).
Magdalen College, Oxford (BA).
Lawyer Rankings(Leading Silks) Ranked: Tier 4 (Leading Silks) Ranked: Tier 4
Essex Court Chambers is to some the ‘go-to commercial set above all others‘ and ‘the universal quality of its counsel marks it out as exceptional‘. Perhaps a mark of the set’s quality and depth is its ability to carry on despite the departure of several high profile silks in 2021, in part owing to sanctions imposed on the set by the Chinese government. A glance at the calibre of the set’s new silks and juniors suggests the future remains bright. Among these, James Willan QC was sole counsel to Nikolay Fetisov, one of the defendants in National Bank Trust v Yurov, a matter concerning an alleged misappropriation of funds from a Russian bank, with Nathan Pillow QC, David Davies and Anton Dudnikov appearing for the claimant, and Paul Stanley QC acting for another defendant. Joe Smouha QC also led for the claimants in PCP Capital Partners LLP v Barclays Bank plc with a team that included James Sheehan.
Nathan Pillow QC – Essex Court Chambers ‘ An extremely sharp legal and strategic mind, wrapped in a very personable and approachable body. Nathan is fantastic to work with and knows instinctively how to drive a case to a successful conclusion. ’
Essex Court Chambers is ‘the leading set for large, complex civil fraud cases‘, commended for its ‘number of very impressive individuals, and huge strength in depth‘. Silks such as Paul McGrath QC and Joe Smouha QC are among the most eminent practitioners in the field, and Smouha QC represented Mozambique in The Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse, Privinvest, and others, the ‘tuna bond’ scandal involving allegations of $200m in bribes, alongside Nathan Pillow QC and leading a team that includes Ciaran Keller. A highlight for McGrath QC has been The Libyan Investment Authority v Credit Suisse International, GLG Partners Asset Management Ltd & Ors, in which he is leading Ruth den Besten on behalf of GLG Partners, in a claim involving allegations of bribes paid to secure a $200m investment into funds. Vernon Flynn QC left to join Brick Court Chambers.
Nathan Pillow QC – Essex Court Chambers ‘ He has a fantastic legal and strategic mind, wrapped in the one of the most user friendly and personable bodies around. He is super responsive and attentive, and instinctively knows how to drive a case to the best possible outcome. ’
Essex Court Chambers is ‘strong in banking litigation‘ and has ‘unparalleled strength in depth‘ for banking fraud cases. One of the set’s most notable cases is PCP Capital Partners LLP v Barclays Plc – a long-running dispute concerning Qatari investment in the bank during the 2008 crisis – in which Joe Smouha QC is leading a team of silks and juniors from within chambers including the highly rated senior junior, James Sheehan. Another highlight case with strong fraud aspects was National Bank TRUST v Yurov, Belyaev & Fetisov in which Nathan Pillow QC is leading David Davies QC, who recently took silk, and Anton Dudnikov. Stephen Houseman QC has made a strong impression in this area and is representing the claimant in Madison Pacific Trust v Sahkoor Capital and PrivatBank, a dispute about limited recourse notes issued by a Ukranian bank which was nationalised in 2016.