The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Doughty Street Chambers

53-54 DOUGHTY STREET, LONDON, WC1N 2LS, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7404 1313
Fax:
Fax 020 7404 2283
DX:
223 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Email:
Web:
www.doughtystreet.co.uk
Bristol, London, Manchester

Robin Oppenheim QC

Tel:
Work 020 7404 1313
Email:
Doughty Street Chambers (Doughty Street Chambers)

Position

Robin Oppenheim was appointed as Queen’s Counsel from 16 October 2006. Robin is a specialist in the fields of clinical negligence, product liability and personal injury work. He has been involved in a significant number of liability and quantum claims of maximum severity clinical negligence and PI over the past 18 months: he has achieved approximately £54 million in damages for personal injury and clinical negligence claimants this year over 15 serious injury cases (last calendar year approximately £40 million over 11 cases). He has achieved significant liability and discounted quantum settlements in catastrophic injury personal injury and clinical negligence claims over the last year. Examples include: CD -v- Birmingham City Council – a personal injury claim by young man against local authority relating to a fall in a council flat resulting in tetraplegia under the Defective Premises Act 1972 raising novel and difficult questions of law. Discounted liability settlement, having rejected previous nuisance offer; MG -v- Dr S: Clinical negligence claim by child for failure to refer his mother to hospital with a hidden bleed leading to cerebral palsy with profound brain damage. Exceptionally complex obstetric and neonatal expert evidence issues which had defeated previous solicitors, counsel and experts, leading to a £3.5m settlement (discounted settlement figure from full value for liability risks) days before trial; CC -v- Prof C – a clinical negligence claim by a young man with a spinal tumour where internationally recognised consultant neurosurgeon rendered him tetraplegic in the course of surgery which had hitherto been vigorously defended. Liability conceded shortly prior to trial. The focus of Robin’s practice in the field of clinical negligence continues to be high value catastrophic brain and spinal injury for children and adults with a particular focus on complex obstetric, neonatal, paediatric and spinal claims. He has developed an expertise in meningitis and meningococcal disease litigation. He currently has one case before the Court of Appeal on this topic and in 2009 and 2008 won two first instance liability trials in this area. He is currently instructed in a case due for hearing before the Court of Appeal in April 2011 in a ground breaking challenge to the way causation is determined in cases where referral of the claimant is delayed to a third party health care provider. In the field of personal injury his work concentrates on severe brain and spinal injury claims, with a particular focus on innovative approaches to quantification, periodical payment and community care issues. He led for a number of the claimants in the landmark Thompstone ASHE 6115 indexation litigation both on appeal and at first instance. He was previously involved in landmark quantum cases such as Heil -v- Rankin (general damages) and Warren -v- Northern General Hospital NHS Trust (discount rate). He is regularly instructed for his expertise on issues relating to periodical payments and community care issues. As identified above he has secured large settlements in the past 18 months in personal injury work. In the field of product liability and group action work he has been involved in many of the major group action product liability claims over the last decade both as a leader and junior: fetal anti-convulsant litigation (to 2009), haemophilia litigation (settled 2010), Northwick Park litigation (settled 2008), dopamine agonist litigation (settled 2008), MMRII, Alder Hey and nationwide organ retention litigation, oral contraceptive pill litigation among others. He is currently advising in claims arising out of stem cell therapy by MS sufferers. He is also instructed in food poisoning litigation claims.

Career

Called 1988; Middle Temple; QC 2006. Publications of note: He is the main contributor to the Damages section in the APlL Personal lnjury Law, Practice and Precedents and Personal lnjury Manual, Jordans. He wrote the section on multi-party actions in Bullen, Leake and Jacob, Sweet and Maxwell, 2007 and will be doing so for the forthcoming edition. He is a contributing author to the PIBA Personal Injury Manual 2007.

Member

Member of Justice, AvMA, PIBA, PNBA, Amnesty.

Education

Acland Burghley, London; Manchester University (1985 BA First Class, Politics and Modern History); Westminster University (1986 DipLaw).


London Bar

Clinical negligence

Within: Clinical negligence – Leading silks

Robin Oppenheim QC - Doughty Street ChambersFantastic attention to detail and a phenomenal work rate.

[back to top]

Product liability

Within: Product liability – Leading silks

Robin Oppenheim QC - Doughty Street ChambersExcellent analytical skills, a top-tier QC.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017

    The following information relates to the enactment of The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017 (" DPL "), which was expected to come into force on 29 January 2019, will now come into force in September 2019. The DPL will regulate the future processing of all personal data in the Cayman Islands.
  • The Mutual Funds Law (2019 Revision)

    The following information relates to the enactment of The Mutual Funds Law (2019 Revision) and the subsequent commencement of related sections of The Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law 2015. The changes require certain funds to notify the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority if they are active in EU jurisdictions.
  • Stuarts Success - Case Review: Toby -v- Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company

    Toby –v- Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, FSD 152 of 2013 (IMJ), Judgment delivered on 29 August 2018
  • Security Token Offerings in the Cayman Islands

    Security Token Offerings (“STOs”) are an extremely popular means of fundraising for new projects and utilise blockchain technology to do so. Whilst no specific legislation has been passed by the Cayman Islands Government in connection with STOs and cryptocurrencies, it would be incorrect to say that STOs are “unregulated”.
  • "BLACK FRIDAY" - NOW FREELY USABLE FOR PROMOTIONS IN AUSTRIA

    Black Friday is unquestionable one of the most profitable and busiest days of the year for retail, particularly online. Worldwide almost all online store do offer sales or special promotions on Black Friday or Cyber Monday. Already after this practice has established online, a trademark for " BLACK FRIDAY " was registered in Germany back in 2013. In 2016 a Chinese company acquired the trademark and then filed in 2017 for its extension to Austria. Based on the registered trademark, it granted exclusive rights to an Austrian company, which licensed usage rights to various partner stores against remuneration. Further, an exclusive " Black Friday-Cooperation Program " was established. Non-partners who used the event name or trademark were prosecuted and requested to either pay a license fee or refrain from running Black Friday promotions. Some followed the request and entered into license agreements. Some, however, did challenge the validity of the trademark. Finally, respective proceedings to check the actual protection of the trademark were initiated. Austrian courts now held that the trademark " BLACK FRIDAY " is not protected in Austria .
    - Dorda
  • The Zero Carbon Bill - a closer look

    ​​​​The long-awaited "Zero Carbon Bill" was finally released on 9 May, but despite being greeted by considerable media interest there are a number of significant issues that have yet to come to the fore.
  • A link tax in New Zealand?

    ​​​​A controversial payment to publishers for content in Europe has implications for New Zealand – despite escaping mention in a recent paper that set out the key issues for review for our own copyright laws.
  • News media exemption under the Privacy Act: now a matter of "responsibility"?

    The role of the news media as the "eyes and ears" of the public, and the corresponding right of such news media to be exempted from the Privacy Act 1993 ( Privacy Act ), is entrenched and well accepted. However, the extent to which the news media exemption applies to non-traditional forms of "news" published by "civilian journalists", such as online commentary and blogs, is a hotly debated subject.
  • Quarterly Update on Trade Defense Cases in Turkey (June 2019)

    The authority to initiate dumping or subsidy examinations, upon complaint or, where necessary, ex officio , has been given from the Ministry of Economy to the Ministry of Trade ("Ministry"). Within the scope of this authority, the Ministry announces its decisions with the communiqués published on the Official Gazette.
  • Company Formations - A jurisdictional guide to setting up a business

    The following article contains the Foreword in the IR Global Virtual Series brochure on 'Company Formations - A jurisdictional guide to setting up a business'.