Richard Thomas KC > Doughty Street Chambers > London, England > Barrister Profile

Doughty Street Chambers
53-54 DOUGHTY STREET
LONDON
WC1N 2LS
England

Work Department

Position

Richard has extensive experience of complex and high-profile trials and appeals. He regularly appears in cases which engage the interface between criminal, public and civil law, and many of his cases involve an international dimension, arising out of multi-jurisdictional investigations or prosecutions. Richard advises individuals, organisations and companies who are seeking to manage the risks of contravening criminal legislation (in particular terrorism and financial sanctions regimes) and is often instructed at an early stage, challenging investigative measures and helping clients manage an overall strategy.

He has a substantial Crown Court trial practice but is a versatile advocate and in recent years has received instructions in the Court of Appeal, Privy Council, Supreme Court, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Administrative, Queen’s Bench and Chancery Divisions of the High Court. Richard is also regularly instructed in cases in other common law jurisdictions, predominantly in the Eastern Caribbean, but also Malaysia, Hong Kong and the Isle of Man.

Career

Year of Call: 2002; Inner Temple; Year of Silk: 2022

Publications of note: co-author, The Law of Public Order and Protest (OUP, 2010); co-author, Blackstone’s Guide to the Proceeds of Crime Act, 4th ed. (OUP, 2011); co-author, Human Rights in the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime (OUP, 2009).

Richard is a Recorder of the Crown Court sitting in crime on the South Eastern Circuit and has also been appointed a Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal.

Memberships

Criminal Bar Association

South Eastern Circuit

Education

Exhibitioner of Lincoln College, Oxford (MA (Oxon)).

Lawyer Rankings

London Bar > Crime

(2022 Silks)Ranked: Tier 1

Richard Thomas KCDoughty Street ChambersRichard is a standout silk of his generation in crime. He commands the respect of the highest courts through considered and carefully marshalled argument in the most difficult and novel cases.’