The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Work 020 7430 2005
Fax 020 7831 4885
Corporate and commercial: Partnership

Corporate and commercial: Partnership


We are one of the smallest but most highly specialised barristers’ chambers in the country. Our exclusive specialism is partnership law, encompassing traditional business and professional partnerships and LLPs, limited partnerships, partnerships between companies and arrangements designed to avoid partnership status. This level of specialisation brings many advantages: we have encountered most dispute-related scenarios that can arise and recognise differing personality types and the way they react, thus enabling us to predict with accuracy likely future conduct and outcomes. Our “seen it all before” approach can bring real comfort and reassurance to anxious clients and an ability quickly to get to the heart of the matter and identify the real issues.

We are, inevitably, involved in all aspects of our specialisation, from strategic advice and planning and representation in disputes, litigation and mediations to the preparation of bespoke draft documents and the review and updating of existing partnership arrangements.

Though we have long been recognised as leaders in our field, it is the level of personal service and engagement with professional and lay clients that we believe is unusual. Clients have frequently expressed surprise at the way we operate: we are not passive or reactive but champion a fully integrated, immersive and proactive approach. Many clients over the years have been individual solicitors or other professionals who seek advice in relation to their own disputes. In cases of this type, the client can walk a lonely and often demoralising path: we see our role in such circumstances is to counter such isolation by acting as equal parts adviser, counsellor, psychologist and “Dutch uncle”, always available to provide legal and moral support, not only when requested but also when we perceive an unspoken need. We do not demand or expect formality: written instructions are a luxury that are not always required. Our problem has always been how to describe our unconventional approach and we often encounter clients at the end of a case who say “Now we understand the true nature of the service you provide”.

We are, of course, equally well used to integrating into a team of advisers when instructing professionals are involved and bring the same proactive approach to bear.

Another ingredient of our philosophy is a dislike of propelling clients into costly disputes unnecessarily. We champion mediation and strive to avoid litigation if not in clients’ interests. We are inordinately proud of the fact that we cannot list a string of reported cases and that, in many instances, our involvement in disputes is known only to our clients and not even to their fellow partners. Equally that approach does not signal a reluctance to litigate where the need arises.

We have advised clients based in various jurisdictions, including the Channel Islands, Hong Kong, Ireland, Germany, Gibraltar and Africa, where English partnership law is applied or where the local partnership law adopts the English model.


Roderick I’Anson Banks

Simon Jelf

Practice manager:

Tyroon Win

020 7430 2005

Partnership Counsel, 9 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7DX


Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has  ‘previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules’,  the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11). 
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal. The  explanatory notes  to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the  Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002  (“the 2002 Act”). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.