The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang Po┼Ťniak i Sawicki sp.k.

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Poland

Banking and finance

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Soltysinski Kawecki & Szlezak

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

Gide Loyrette Nouel

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

DLA Piper

Kochanski & Partners

Capital markets

Norton Rose Fulbright

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP

Prof. Marek Wierzbowski and Partners Advocates and Legal Counsellors

act BSWW

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

Commercial, corporate and M&A

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

Norton Rose Fulbright

Noerr

Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland

Soltysinski Kawecki & Szlezak

Gide Loyrette Nouel

Competition/antitrust

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP

White & Case M. Studniarek i Wsp├│lnicy - Kancelaria Prawna sp.k.

Construction

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

act BSWW

DLA Piper

Dispute resolution

R├ÂHRENSCHEF

Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp. k.

Laszczuk i Wsp├│lnicy sp.k.

Employment

Dentons

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

DLA Piper

Energy and natural resources

Baker & McKenzie Krzyżowski i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowa

Squire Patton Boggs Swiecicki Krzesniak sp. k.

Clifford Chance

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

Insurance

Budzowska, Fiutowski & Partnerzy - Radcowie Prawni

Baker & McKenzie Krzyżowski i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowa

Intellectual property

Lesnodorski, Slusarek & Partners

Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland

Kochanski & Partners

DLA Piper

Czyzewscy Kancelaria Adwokacka

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

Investment funds

Crido Legal

Private equity

Norton Rose Fulbright

Dentons

Baker & McKenzie Krzyżowski i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowa

Public law

Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland

Olesinski & Wspolnicy

Real estate

Baker & McKenzie Krzyżowski i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowa

Clifford Chance

Gide Loyrette Nouel

DLA Piper

Restructuring and insolvency

Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp. k.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

TMT

Traple Konarski Podrecki & Partners

Tax

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

Radzikowski, Szubielska i Wsp├│lnicy sp.k.

White-collar crime

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP

Dentons

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

act BSWW

Noerr

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Soltysinski Kawecki & Szlezak

Laszczuk i Wsp├│lnicy sp.k.

DLA Piper

Kondracki Celej Adwokaci sp.p.


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Poland

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to