The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Russia

Banking and finance: Borrower side

LP Law Firm

Dechert Russia LLC

Noerr

Baker & McKenzie - CIS, Limited

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Ivanyan & Partners

White & Case LLC

King & Spalding LLP

Banking and finance: Lender or arranger side

Pepeliaev Group

King & Spalding LLP

Noerr

LP Law Firm

Dechert Russia LLC

KIAP (Korelskiy, Ischuk, Astafiev and Partners, Attorneys at Law)

Commercial, corporate and M&a: Moscow

Andrey Gorodissky & Partners

LP Law Firm

VEGAS LEX

Ivanyan & Partners

Infralex

Noerr

King & Spalding LLP

Monastyrsky, Zyuba, Stepanov & Partners

Competition

ART DE LEX Law Firm

Muranov, Chernyakov & Partners

DLA Piper

Infralex

Noerr

Dispute resolution: Litigation

Noerr

Ivanyan & Partners

Lidings

Infralex

LP Law Firm

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Rustam Kurmaev & Partners

Employment

FBK Legal

Dechert Russia LLC

Squire Patton Boggs

Five Stones Consulting

Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Energy and natural resources

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP

Clifford Chance

Dechert Russia LLC

DLA Piper

Baker & McKenzie - CIS, Limited

Intellectual property

Patent & Law Firm Yus

KIAP (Korelskiy, Ischuk, Astafiev and Partners, Attorneys at Law)

Gowling WLG

Pepeliaev Group

Gorodissky & Partners

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners

PPP and infrastructure projects

Infralex

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners

Clifford Chance

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP

FBK Legal

ALRUD Law Firm

Real estate and construction

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Ivanyan & Partners

Borenius

Capital Legal Services

Hogan Lovells (CIS)

Sirota & Partners

TMT

LP Law Firm

Pepeliaev Group

Clifford Chance

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

DLA Piper

Noerr

Tax

BGP Litigation

Deloitte Legal


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Russia

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to