The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Russia

Banking and finance: Borrower side

LP Law Firm

Baker & McKenzie - CIS, Limited

King & Spalding LLP

Dechert Russia LLC

Ivanyan & Partners

Noerr

White & Case LLC

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Banking and finance: Lender or arranger side

Dechert Russia LLC

LP Law Firm

Noerr

King & Spalding LLP

Pepeliaev Group

KIAP (Korelskiy, Ischuk, Astafiev and Partners, Attorneys at Law)

Commercial, corporate and M&a: Moscow

Monastyrsky, Zyuba, Stepanov & Partners

Noerr

King & Spalding LLP

Ivanyan & Partners

VEGAS LEX

Andrey Gorodissky & Partners

LP Law Firm

Infralex

Competition

ART DE LEX Law Firm

Noerr

Infralex

DLA Piper Rus Limited

Muranov, Chernyakov & Partners

Dispute resolution: Litigation

Ivanyan & Partners

LP Law Firm

Rustam Kurmaev & Partners

Infralex

Lidings

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Noerr

Employment

Eversheds Sutherland

Five Stones Consulting

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Squire Patton Boggs

FBK Legal

Dechert Russia LLC

Energy and natural resources

Clifford Chance

Baker & McKenzie - CIS, Limited

DLA Piper Rus Limited

Dechert Russia LLC

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP

Intellectual property

KIAP (Korelskiy, Ischuk, Astafiev and Partners, Attorneys at Law)

Gowling WLG

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners

Pepeliaev Group

Patent & Law Firm Yus

Gorodissky & Partners

PPP and infrastructure projects

FBK Legal

Infralex

ALRUD Law Firm

Clifford Chance

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners

Real estate and construction

Borenius

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Hogan Lovells (CIS)

Capital Legal Services

Sirota & Partners

Ivanyan & Partners

TMT

DLA Piper Rus Limited

Clifford Chance

Pepeliaev Group

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Noerr

LP Law Firm

Tax

BGP Litigation

Deloitte Legal


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Russia

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to