The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Spain

Banking and finance

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Araoz & Rueda

Jones Day

ONTIER

Capital markets: Debt

Simmons & Simmons

Baker McKenzie

DLA Piper LLP

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

Capital markets: Equity

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

White & Case LLP

Latham & Watkins LLP

Pérez-Llorca

Commercial, corporate and M&A

Araoz & Rueda

DLA Piper LLP

Deloitte Legal

BROSETA Abogados

Dispute resolution

BROSETA Abogados

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

ONTIER

RCD

B. Cremades & Asociados

Latham & Watkins LLP

ECIJA

Simmons & Simmons

Araoz & Rueda

Roca Junyent

Andersen Tax & Legal

EU and competition

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

Baker McKenzie

Employment

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

Clifford Chance

Deloitte Legal

Industry focus: TMT

RCD

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Bird & Bird

Pérez-Llorca

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Insurance

Blanco & Asociados Abogados

KPMG Abogados

Intellectual property: Copyright

Jones Day

DLA Piper LLP

Roca Junyent

Augusta Abogados

Intellectual property: Trade marks

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

DA Lawyers

Fieldfisher JAUSAS

Private equity

Dentons

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

Araoz & Rueda

BROSETA Abogados

Projects and energy

Dentons

Araoz & Rueda

Public law

DLA Piper LLP

RCD

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Baker McKenzie

Real estate and construction

Roca Junyent

Squire Patton Boggs

Araoz & Rueda

GTA Villamagna Abogados

ONTIER

Cases&Lacambra

Simmons & Simmons

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

BROSETA Abogados

Restructuring and insolvency

Simmons & Simmons

Baker McKenzie

DLA Piper LLP

Pérez-Llorca

Tax

Andersen Tax & Legal

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

Dentons

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

Araoz & Rueda

Simmons & Simmons

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

White-collar crime

Simmons & Simmons

Jones Day


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Spain

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to