The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Spain

Banking and finance

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Araoz & Rueda

ONTIER

Jones Day

Capital markets: Debt

Simmons & Simmons

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

DLA Piper LLP

Baker McKenzie

Capital markets: Equity

White & Case LLP

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

Latham & Watkins LLP

Pérez-Llorca

Commercial, corporate and M&A

BROSETA Abogados

Araoz & Rueda

Deloitte Legal

DLA Piper LLP

Dispute resolution

Araoz & Rueda

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Roca Junyent

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Simmons & Simmons

Andersen Tax & Legal

ONTIER

Latham & Watkins LLP

ECIJA

BROSETA Abogados

B. Cremades & Asociados

RCD

EU and competition

Baker McKenzie

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

Employment

Clifford Chance

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

Deloitte Legal

Industry focus: TMT

Hogan Lovells International LLP

RCD

Bird & Bird

Pérez-Llorca

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Insurance

KPMG Abogados

Blanco & Asociados Abogados

Intellectual property: Copyright

Jones Day

Roca Junyent

DLA Piper LLP

Augusta Abogados

Intellectual property: Trade marks

DA Lawyers

Fieldfisher JAUSAS

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Private equity

Araoz & Rueda

Dentons

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

BROSETA Abogados

Projects and energy

Dentons

Araoz & Rueda

Public law

Baker McKenzie

RCD

DLA Piper LLP

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Real estate and construction

ONTIER

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

Simmons & Simmons

BROSETA Abogados

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Araoz & Rueda

Cases&Lacambra

Roca Junyent

Squire Patton Boggs

Restructuring and insolvency

Simmons & Simmons

Pérez-Llorca

Baker McKenzie

DLA Piper LLP

Tax

Simmons & Simmons

Dentons

Andersen Tax & Legal

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

Araoz & Rueda

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

White-collar crime

Jones Day

Simmons & Simmons


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Spain

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to