The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría

CARRERA 9 74-08, OFFICE 105, BOGOTA, COLOMBIA
Tel:
Work +57 1 326 8600
Email:
Web:
www.ppulegal.com

Hector Hernandez

Tel:
Work +5713268607
Email:
Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría

Work Department

Labor, Dispute Resloution

Position

Partner

Career

Héctor focuses his practice on labor and dispute resolution. He has ample experience in civil, labour and commercial dispute resolution, representing clients in front of courts, as well as in arbitration proceedings. His expertise has contributed to the firm’s success in this area. He provides clients with litigation advice in the areas of civil, commercial and labour law. He focuses on the representation of clients in negotiations with unions and employees. He has advised foreign clients in relation to Colombian labour and social security law, and has coordinated labour due diligence for several companies. He also has experience in dispute resolution and commercial litigation in front of judicial courts and arbitration tribunals. His past counseling includes litigation related to competition, intellectual property, labor and administrative areas, utility, tax, media and entertainment law. He has more than 30 years of experience consulting in labour matters for companies in the hydrocarbons sector, amongst others. He has been a professor at the Universidad del Rosario, where he taught introductory courses to law. Chambers Latin America 2016 mentions: “Market commentators recognise the expertise of Héctor Hernández and describe his service as "excellent," adding that "he helped on everything." He is highly experienced in administrative, employment and intellectual property disputes.”

Languages

Spanish, English

Member

Labor attorneys school, Colombia 2014 - 2015 Labor committee of the Amcham, Colombia 2011 - 2015 Labor committee of the Andi, Colombia 2010 - 2015

Education

Universidad del Rosario Law Degree – 1988.


Colombia

Labour and employment

Within: Leading individuals

Héctor Hernández - Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría

Within: Labour and employment

Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría’s practice group has ‘ample experience in handling delicate situations’ involving the client’s employees, ‘providing strategic advice about how to handle them’. Héctor Hernández and principal associate Carolina Porras (‘has profound knowledge and provides reliable advice’) co-head the six-strong department. The practice has successfully assisted Mondelez in over 15 rights-of-action claims and is representing the company in eight different labour court proceedings brought by 68 former employees claiming reinstatement to former positions with full rights. The team also advised Agrícola Automotriz on the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement with its union, and advised Paesa in a labour due diligence of the company’s compensation scheme, among other matters. Former principal associate Diana Zuleta moved to DLA Piper Martinez Beltrán. Other clients include Under Armour, Cinte, Abbott Laboratories and Chevron.

[back to top]

Colombia: Dispute resolution

Arbitration

Within: Arbitration

Multi-jurisdictional firm Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría fields a 15-strong practice group in Colombia that is active in both national and international arbitration. Department co-head Julio César González is leading the advice to a Portuguese agro-industrial company in an international arbitration under the rules of the Bogotá Chamber of Commerce and concerning the breach of an $11m supply agreement to deliver food to Venezuela. His fellow co-head, Héctor Hernández, is representing the concessionaire of an EPC contract for the construction of 200km of roads in an arbitration regarding interpretation of the concession agreement. Principal associates Juan Mendoza and Juan Sebastián Arias, who joined in 2018 from Jones Day’s Miami office, are also key members of the team.

[back to top]

Litigation

Within: Leading individuals

Héctor Hernández - Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría

Within: Litigation

Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría offers ‘experience and versatility’ and delivers ‘good results’ in complex civil, commercial and administrative litigation. Julio César González and Héctor Hernández co-head the 15-strong team, which has a ‘great capacity to understand the needs of the client and provide alternative solutions’. The firm is advising the subsidiary of a leading global investment bank in a class action brought by Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo, which seeks - within the company’s forced liquidation process as ordered by the health regulator - to declare the sale of the contracts, assets and liabilities of Saludcoop EPS in 2017 null and void; the investment bank had advised the company in the transactions. Other mandates included representing a number of local gas and energy company in an action against the issuance by the regulator of an executive order that modifies their remuneration. Senior associates Mario Pérez and Juan Sebastián Arias are also noted. Siemens, Lazard,  DHL and Citibank are some of the firm's other clients.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • DO FIDIC RULE APPLY IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS IN UAE?

    Since a very long time, FIDIC (The International Federation of Consulting Engineers) is commonly used a standard for international construction and engineering contracts and is very frequently used in UAE. It mainly governs the construction works within the country and in GCC. 
  • Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the Communiqué on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ Communiqué ”), on October 3, 2019. The Communiqué entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.
  • CJEU RULED ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • ITALIAN RULES ON JOINT VENTURES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND CONCESSIONS

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.