The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413, USA
Tel:
Work +1 202 408 4000
Email:
Web:
www.finnegan.com

Mike Jakes, Partner

Finnegan’s Mike Jakes discusses the future challenges IP firms face

What do you see as the main points that differentiate Finnegan from your competitors?

Finnegan is one of the few firms of its size that focuses on intellectual property law. With more than 350 IP professionals, we have the capacity and depth of experience to hit the ground running with virtually any technology or legal issue. But we didn’t get to be one of the world’s largest IP law firms by just growing our lawyer ranks and adding offices. We got there by truly believing in our clients while protecting, advocating, and leveraging their ideas.

Our culture is based on a simple concept—that all clients are clients of the firm. While this seems logical, the fact is that in many law firms, a client is the property of an originating partner. Since Finnegan’s founding in 1965 by good friends Marc Finnegan and Doug Henderson, the decision was deliberately made that every lawyer in their growing firm should have the same interest in serving a client as any other. And so it has always been at Finnegan that every client’s needs are the concern of every attorney and member of our staff.

Which practices do you see growing in the next 12 months? What are the drivers behind that?

Post-grant review in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has greatly changed the landscape of patent law in the United States, and we expect that it will continue to be a significant and growing part of our practice. Finnegan has already represented clients—petitioners and patent owners—in nearly 700 proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) since 2012. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group, just rejected a challenge under the U.S. Constitution to inter partes review of issued patents so those proceedings are here to stay. They will continue to be important as the validity of patents is often decided in PTAB trials rather than the courts.

Biologics and biosimilars will also be an increasing practice area for Finnegan. The main driver is the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which opened the door for companies to seek FDA approval to manufacture and sell biosimilar or interchangeable versions of brand name biological products. Finnegan advises clients on virtually every intellectual property issue related to this complex and evolving area of branded biologics and biosimilars, including patent prosecution, due diligence investigations, portfolio management, and litigation.

Practice before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has also rebounded in a big way. After a downturn in the number of investigations at the ITC, that has turned around completely in the last two years. Beyond the cases involving electronics, such as the “smartphone” wars a few years ago, these investigations have involved technologies such as medical devices and biotech. For example, Finnegan recently represented Ajinomoto in a rare biotech investigation involving patents related to genetically modified organisms to make commercial quantities of tryptophan. The ITC found Ajinomoto’s patents valid and infringed and issued limited exclusion and cease-and-desist orders barring the respondents from importing infringing products into the United States. With injunctions still hard to obtain in the district courts, patent owners are turning back to the ITC to protect their IP.

What's the main change you've made in the firm that will benefit clients?

Our clients’ businesses and IP assets are global. To meet this challenge, Finnegan has offices in the key global markets of London, Seoul, Shanghai, Taipei, and Tokyo. This expansion has been gradual, but the change to a truly international IP firm gives us the resources and experience to formulate and execute global strategies for our clients. Our professionals are multilingual and multicultural, and they work with clients in real time around the clock and around the world. Our clients obviously benefit when we can provide them with a single coordinated strategy to protect their global IP.

Is technology changing the way you interact with your clients, and the services you can provide them?

As a firm focused on technology, Finnegan itself has always taken advantage of new technology to better serve our clients. Although we take much of it for granted today, the advances in communication have greatly improved the way we can interact with clients in real time. The proliferation of electronic documents has made litigation more costly, not less, and we’re constantly looking for ways to use technology to reduce costs while delivering the same results. We have applications that give clients access to the latest developments in the law in a focused and timely way. These are just a few of the ways that technology has changed our practice. Our clients come to us to protect their cutting-edge technology, and we need to have the best tools to do that.

But because we understand technology so well, we also know that it is only a means, not an end. We can have the best technology in the legal business (and we do), but it’s still no substitute for the investment in our people. Technology greatly improves the delivery of legal advice and services, but it’s still the knowledge and advice that matters!

Can you give us a practical example of how you have helped a client to add value to their business?

Finnegan adds value to our clients’ business by protecting their intellectual assets. As a full-service IP firm, we have the ability to protect these assets in creative ways, using patents, designs, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and other techniques. We can license these assets for monetary value, or when necessary, litigate to protect them. A recent high-profile example where we did just that was a temporary restraining order we obtained for Patagonia against jackets bearing a replication of Patagonia's mountain-peak logo.

Protecting these intellectual assets is increasingly challenging, however, as the law is constantly changing. We don’t just keep up with the rapid changes in the law though—we set the pace. For example, after the America Invents Act in 2012, Finnegan was one of the first firms to file a covered business method review petition at the PTAB, the first to argue at an oral hearing before the Board, and the first to win a trial before the PTAB.

Are clients looking for stability and strategic direction from their law firms - where do you see the firm in three year's time?

Clients certainly look for stability and strategic direction from their law firms. In a topsy-turvy legal market, Finnegan has been remarkably stable. This is largely due to our focus on intellectual property law—we don’t chase after every hot new practice area or need to dump unfashionable practice groups. But with our depth of IP experience and technical expertise, we’re able to stay in front and lead the development of the law, such as we have with the PTAB trial practice. Our clients benefit because we can provide the strategic direction to protect their IP assets as the law develops and not just react to changes after they happen. Because of our solid foundation, Finnegan will continue to lead in the global protection of IP.

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Consolidated Group (Income Tax) Rules, 2019

    On 31 May 2019, Malta published the “Consolidated Group (Income Tax) Rules". The rules will come into force as from year of assessment 2020 and the rules introduce the concept of fiscal units into Maltese tax law .
  • Renewable energy in Ukraine: green auctions launched

    In the first half of 2019 alone, renewable energy facilities with a capacity of more than 1.5 GW were connected to the Ukrainian grid, with about 96% of those being solar and wind energy facilities. In the whole of 2018, which has been a record-breaking year so far, numbers were almost half as high. The Ukrainian market also remains very attractive to foreign investors, not least because of the lucrative feed-in tariff rates, which are paid out regularly. Now, after the adoption of the so-called law on green auctions, significant changes can be expected.
  • Economic Substance Requirements - Fund Managers

    The International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Law, 2018 (the “ES Law”) came into effect in the Cayman Islands on 1 January 2019, requiring in-scope entities that carry on particular activities to have demonstrable economic substance in the Cayman Islands.
  • Shipping at the spotlight of terrorism

    Is terrorism the new norm for shipping?
  • Adidas three stripe Trademark Revocation

    In a judgment of the General Court of the European Union of the 19th June 2019, Adidas saw their hopes of extending their three stripes trademark dashed, as the court ruled that there was no distinctiveness in the three stripes trademark. Furthermore, the court held that the Adidas had failed to prove that the mark had acquired distinctive character through use throughout the member states of the EU.
  • David against Goliath – Libra vs Central Banks: Who will win?

    Working in the crypto and DLT space is like being on an emotional rollercoaster with feelings which range from curiosity, excitement, euphoria, revelation, shock, disappointment, hope, wonder and determination – did I miss any?
  • UK Telecoms company fined £100K over unsolicited marketing messages

    The Information Commissioner’s Office (‘ICO’) which is the UK’s data protection supervisory authority, recently issued a fine of £100,000 to EE Limited, a telecoms company operating in the UK. The fine was issued in response to EE Limited having sent two and a half million unsolicited direct marketing messages to its customers, back in early 2018. The direct marketing messages were sent without EE Limited having first obtained the required consent to send them to its clients.
  • British Airways and Marriott International Inc. face huge fines from UK data protection authority

    British Airways (‘BA’) may be hit with what will be the highest-ever penalty which the Information Commissioner’s Office (‘ICO’), the UK’s data protection supervisory authority, has handed out.
  • UAE Tax domicile certificate

    Issued by the Ministry of Finance in the United Arab Emirates (‘UAE’), the Tax Domicile Certificate (also referred to as the Tax Residency Certificate) enables eligible government entities, companies and individuals to take advantage of double taxation avoidance agreements on income signed by the UAE.
  • The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017

    The following information relates to the enactment of The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017 (" DPL "), which was expected to come into force on 29 January 2019, will now come into force in September 2019. The DPL will regulate the future processing of all personal data in the Cayman Islands.