The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Campbell Johnston Clark

59 MANSELL STREET, LONDON, E1 8AN, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7855 9669
Fax:
Fax 020 7855 9666
Email:
Web:
www.cjclaw.com

Firm Rankings


London: Transport

Shipping
Shipping - ranked: tier 3

Campbell Johnston Clark

Marine-focused firm Campbell Johnston Clark is 'highly-regarded'; it handles a raft of contentious and non-contentious work, such as admiralty, marine insurance, charterparty, bill of lading, commodity, shipbuilding and offshore work. Clients include insurers, ship owners, ship managers, brokers and P&I Clubs. The team represents hull and war risks insurers on a significant coverage dispute subsequent to the sinking of a cargo ship, and on a claim by the assureds under the relevant policies. Alistair Johnston heads the litigation team and is experienced in major casualty matters.

Practice head(s):Alistair Johnston; Jonathan Campbell

Other key lawyers:Maria Borg Barthet; Ian Short; Kirsty MacHardy; Duncan Ealand; James Clayton

Testimonials

The team gets good results and has a straightforward approach.

Key Clients

MS AMLIN

Shipowners P&I Club

Kiran Shipping

AXA XL

Tokio Marine Houston Casualty

Union Maritime

Lomar Shipmanagement

Columbia Shipmanagement

Pan Ocean

GNMTC

Work highlights

  • The team represents the owners and hull underwriters of the Vista Spirit following an allision between the Vista Spirit and an 18th Century villa on the edge of  the Bosphorus in Istanbul.
  • The team represents the owners of the Stema Barge and its insurers in High Court litigation following a significant casualty off the coast of Dover in 2016.
  • The team represents hull underwriters on casualty handling, salvage and recourse following a significant casualty resulting from the decomposition of a cargo of fertilizer.
  • The team is representing a leading UK-based ferry company in three high profile casualty matters.
Leading individuals

Alistair Johnston - Campbell Johnston Clark

[back to top]


Further information on Campbell Johnston Clark

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Campbell Johnston Clark in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

Singapore

Offices in Singapore

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.