The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP

326 OLD STREET, LONDON, EC1V 9DR, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7613 1402
Fax:
Fax 020 7613 2711
DX:
137773 FINSBURY-5
Web:
www.rfblegal.co.uk
London EC1V, London M1, London W1U

Jonathan Roberts

Tel:
Work 020 7613 1402
Email:
Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP

Position

Jonathan Roberts is the senior partner of the firm. He has vast experience in dealing with a broad spectrum of work but now specialises in dealing with a range of business clients both in resolving disputes and property matters. After obtaining a degree in modern history at Oxford University, Jonathan joined the firm as an articled clerk in 1973. In 1976 he qualified as a solicitor and became a partner in 1982, and senior partner in 1989. Jonathan has a firm and longstanding relationship with many of his clients reflecting the care and commitment he invests in his work. He has been recommended by The Legal 500 2014 describing him as having ‘a keen eye for the commerciality of a settlement'. His highlights this year include the Court of Appeal victory in the SC Confectia SA v Miss Mania Wholesale Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 1484, which was undertaken alongside the experienced Rebecca Roberts. Jonathan Roberts is known amongst his peers and clients as an exceptional solicitor who has been at the forefront of developments in commercial litigation for the past 30 years. In particular Jonathan led the case of Re D’Jan of London Ltd [1993], the leading authority on director’s liability, the principles of which were codified in the Companies Act 2006. He is regularly instructed in complex company disputes, in particular unfair prejudice petitions and breach of directors’ duties as well as issues of international sale of goods and bailment. Recent highlights include: Tahir Fadallah v John Pollak [2013] EWHC 3159 (QB); Kardemir Haddecilik Tidaret San ve Tic Sti v Caparo Steele Products 2013; Reiss and Others v Eksa Ulus Tas Ve Dis Tic Ltd Sti and Others 2013; SC Confectia SA v Miss Mania Wholesale Limited 2013; Islam v Al-Sami and another [2011] EWCA Civ 32; Chantry Estates (South East) Ltd v Anderson [2010] EWCA 316; M&J Marine Engineering Services Co Limited v Shipshore Limited [2009] EWHC 2031 (Comm); and Re D’Jan of London Ltd [1993] B.C.C. 646.


London: Dispute resolution

Commercial litigation

Within: Commercial litigation

Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP is recommended for 'its ability to handle complex litigation and for being effective'. The practice acts in a large number of high -level international contractual and corporate disputes, often with multi-jurisdictional elements. Jonathan Roberts 'gives sensible, pragmatic advice'; and Rudi Ramdarshan 'brings extraordinary judgment to complex commercial issues'. Rebecca Roberts and David Burns were made equity partners.

[back to top]

London: Real estate

Property litigation

Within: Property litigation

Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP's team is ‘tenacious and determined in achieving the best possible outcome for clients’. The group has a ‘loyal group of major landlord clients’ and has ‘a particularly strong grip on commercial land and tenant related issues’. Partners Rudi Ramdarshan, David Burns and Jonathan Roberts jointly lead the practice which has core strengths in dilapidations, tenancy renewals, construction disputes, rights to light and enfranchisement. The ‘tactically very astute’ Ramdarshan and Burns ‘work around the clock to maintain an ever-increasing practice’. Associate solicitor Laura Gomme is ‘client focused, pragmatic and one to watch for the future’. The team has been bolstered by the arrivals of Irina Apekisheva from Howard Kennedy LLP, Benjamin Frost from Gordon Dadds LLP and Jonathan Chan from Maxwell Alves.  In a recent highlight, the team successfully represented EHDI International in a complex commercial forfeiture case.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments in London

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • The legal difference between a consultant and an employee according to Nicaraguan Law

    Knowing the legal difference between a consultant and an employee is important for a company that needs to hire someone in Nicaragua or for a person interested in rendering services for a company or another person, due to the fact that the nature of the contractual relationship will determine many factors that both parties must be aware of before executing the contracting modality that will govern the relationship between them - the nature of the contractual relationship impacts on the employment benefits, tax implications and liabilities that the parties must comply with according to the law.  labor_law_in_nicaragua
  • Single director - shareholder Companies according to the Nicaraguan legal system

    What is a Single Shareholder and Director legal entity?
  • Business in Nicaragua- The Most Important Changes in the Recent Tax Reform

    In recent years, the country ́s the government has been committed to improving Taxation in Nicaragua and attempting to follow the legislative model used by some of the other countries in the region. Starting January 1st, 2013, a new tax law (Law No. 822, Tax Concertation Law) came into force in and completely changed the taxation system in Nicaragua. Two years later a new law was issued by the National Assembly containing more than 80 amendments, additions and repeals (Law No 891) which came into force December 18th, 2014.