The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
Work 020 7353 5005
Fax 020 7353 5553

London: Dispute resolution

Commercial litigation
Commercial litigation - ranked: tier 8


Carter-Ruck handles breach of contract, shareholder and partnership matters, professional negligence, breaches of confidence, and IP issues. Adam Tudor leads the commercial litigation practice, Alasdair Pepper's practice involves financial mis-selling claims; and Matthew Wescott acts in commercial, financial, insurance and construction disputes. Antonia Foster and Claire Gill are also experienced advisers.

Practice head(s):Adam Tudor; Alasdair Pepper; Matthew Wescott

Other key lawyers:Antonia Foster; Claire Gill 

Work highlights

  • Advised four claimants on a claim involving an equity release scheme.

[back to top]

International arbitration
International arbitration - ranked: tier 7


The geographical distribution of Carter-Ruck's cases has expanded to include eastern Europe, the CIS, the Middle East, South Asia and Latin America, and the practice acts in both investment treaty and commercial arbitrations. The 'entire team is a pleasure to work with and willing to listen to the views of others'. Senior partner Cameron Doley leads the team, which also includes Alasdair Pepper and Matthew Wescott.

Practice head(s):Cameron Doley

Other key lawyers:Alasdair Pepper; Matthew Wescott


'The firm is a high-quality outfit, expertly led from the top in an understated way by Cameron Doley'.

'Matthew Wescott combines his great legal skills with good commercial common sense'.

'Alasdair Pepper is approachable yet assertive'.

Key Clients

Al Jazeera Media Network


The State of Qatar

Qatar Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy

Qatar Armed Forces

beIN Media Group

Work highlights

  • Represented Al Jazeera Media Network in its ICSID arbitration against Egypt, pursuant to the Qatar and Egypt BIT.

[back to top]

Public international law
Public international law - ranked: tier 3


Carter-Ruck's team is particularly experienced in relation to sanctions or restrictive measures imposed at UN, EU or domestic level, and often represents clients before the UN Ombudsperson, the European Court of Justice, and in domestic judicial reviews of administrative decisions relating to sanctions. Guy Martin 'is the one of the foremost legal experts on sanctions'; he is representing Saudi businessman and philanthropist Yassin Kadi in his longstanding battle to challenge sanctions imposed on him in October 2001. Other key clients include governments, heads of state and leading political figures, commercial entities, charities and high-profile private clients.

Practice head(s):Guy Martin


'Peerless in international sanctions work, with a combination of huge experience and excellent client care'

'Guy Martin leaves no stone unturned; his combination of legal knowledge, political savviness and client care is second to none.'

Key Clients

Al Jazeera Media Network

The State of Qatar

Sheikh Yassin Abdullah Kadi

Qatar Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy

Hosni Mubarak (former Egyptian President) and his wife

Mrs Suha Arafat (widow of the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat)

Work highlights

  • Representing the Al-Jazeera Media Network in ICSID arbitration against Egypt pursuant to a BIT, in connection with the loss of the network’s substantial investment in Egypt as a result of the Egyptian government’s campaign against it during and following the military coup of July 2013.
Leading individuals

Guy Martin - Carter-Ruck

[back to top]

London: Risk advisory

Reputation management
Reputation management - ranked: tier 1


The defamation & reputation management practice at Carter-Ruck is a safe port of call for blue chip companies and handles an increasing number of clients from the Middle East.  The 'hugely experienced, likeable and savvy' Nigel Tait and the 'calm and measured' Adam Tudor lead a team that acts in an extensive number of libel and privacy complaints. The firm 'remains at the very top of the tree' and fields a strong team that also includes pre-publication expert Alasdair Pepper and Rebecca Toman, who acts for ultra high-net-worth individuals, entrepreneurs and celebrities. Claire Gill stands out for her role as lead partner in the landmark "right to be forgotten" case NT1/NT2 v Google where she successfully obtained an order to remove the claimants' private information from the search engine in a novel High Court ruling. Associate Helena Shipman continues to have significant impact on the practice and demonstrates 'excellent client care' in her area of expertise; misuse of private information and breach of the data protection act.

Practice head(s):Nigel Tait; Adam Tudor

Other key lawyers:Claire Gill; Alasdair Pepper, Rebecca Toman; Helena Shipman


'Very much the market leaders in reputation management.'

'Carter-Ruck remains at the very top of the tree for media and communications/ reputation management work. They have huge amounts of experience together with the resources to do a thorough job on every case.'

'There is no better claimant law firm, although they also do media cases for defendants.'

'Nigel Tait is hugely experienced, able, likeable and savvy. '

'An unrivalled range of truly exceptional practitioners steeped in all aspects of this work. They are able to put together teams at partner/associate level tailored to the particular needs of any client/case at the shortest notice.'

'Whilst some firms can match them in individual cases, none have the capacity to handle as many high-profile matters simultaneously.'

'Nigel Tait has extensive legal knowledge coupled with astute tactical sense.'

'Adam Tudor is calm and measured, even under pressure. He is always focused on the end product rather than short-term gains.'

'Helena Shipman demonstrates excellent client care and the ability to drag a better offer out of the other side than anybody else thought possible.'

Key Clients

Simon Cowell

SyCo Entertainment


The Labour Party

BT Plc

Sasha Wass QC

Baronness Sayeeda Warsi

Richard Burgon MP

James Blunt

Yusuf Islam (formerly known as Cat Stevens)

Kate & Gerry McCann

Nick Brown

Sports Direct

Richard Caring

Work highlights

  • Acted for 'NT1' and 'NT2' in their ground-breaking claims against Google LLC.
  • Secured full Court apology and £110,000 in libel damages from The Mail on Sunday for top criminal QC Sasha Wass.
  • Represented Richard Burgon MP in his libel claim against the Sun's "Nazi symbols" claim.
  • Secured a front-page apology, substantial libel damages and legal costs from Jewish News after publishing false allegations about Baroness Warsi.
  • Represented Nick Brown MP in his claim against Faber & Faber publishing house and bestselling political author Tom Bower in relation to his book "Broken Vows – Tony Blair, The Tragedy of Power".
Leading individuals

Adam Tudor - Carter-Ruck

Nigel Tait - Carter-Ruck

Next Generation Partners

Rebecca Toman - Carter-Ruck

[back to top]

Further information on Carter-Ruck

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Carter-Ruck in other jurisdictions.


Offices in London

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.