The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
Work 020 7725 1313

Steinfeld Law LLP: City Standards: West End Style


Steinfeld Law specialises in providing expert legal advice to the business world. With a small and dynamic team of solicitors, we are able to provide responsive and commercially focused legal advice and adopt a tailored approach to transactional work that accommodates the needs and concerns of our clients.

The mission of our founder, Michael Steinfeld, was to establish a practice capable of providing the level of commercial awareness, technical skill and legal dexterity afforded by top City firms, but with more personal and flexible service, and at a lower and realistic price.

Steinfeld Law tailors its services to suit the needs of each client, whether they are established businesses or start-ups. With a diverse client portfolio, and a wealth of experience advising on matters ranging from company formation and shareholder arrangements, private placings, management buy-outs and acquisitions, we are focused on understanding and helping our clients to achieve their objectives both during a transaction and as their businesses grow and evolve. Many of our clients have been with us for over a decade and trust us to provide commercially focused legal advice and guidance throughout the lifecycle of their businesses and not just at the key milestones.

In addition to our corporate and business focus, we complement our practice by offering both commercial and residential property services, specialising in commercial leases and retail and office acquisitions and disposals. A number of our clients are active in the commercial property market so we combine genuine insight into the sector with a pragmatic and commercial approach to transactional and advisory work.

We understand the nuances of the law and, more importantly, the challenges and complexities of business. Our aim is always to use our legal knowledge and skills to help you meet your business goals and offer creative solutions to all problems.


  • Solicitors: 3
  • Trainee Solicitors: 1
  • Office Management: 1
  • Languages
  • English
  • Member
  • Law Society
  • SRA

Above material supplied by Steinfeld Law LLP.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.