{"id":57642,"date":"2026-07-06T10:52:53","date_gmt":"2026-07-06T10:52:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/?post_type=legal_developments&#038;p=57642"},"modified":"2026-07-06T10:52:53","modified_gmt":"2026-07-06T10:52:53","slug":"the-solidarity-tax-in-the-context-of-the-energy-crisis-friend-foe-or-accomplice","status":"publish","type":"legal_developments","link":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/thought-leadership\/the-solidarity-tax-in-the-context-of-the-energy-crisis-friend-foe-or-accomplice\/","title":{"rendered":"The Solidarity Tax in the Context of the Energy Crisis\u2014Friend, Foe, or Accomplice?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Authored by Roman Bradu, Managing Partner and Noemi C\u0103dariu, Managing Associate<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Contextual Introduction<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>The current energy crisis originated among the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in late 2021, when most European countries simultaneously faced both a shortage of resources (fuel, crude oil, natural gas, and electricity) and an unexpected surge in their prices. Naturally, although the crisis was driven by a number of economic factors, the main factors were (i) the <em>rapid<\/em>post-COVID-19 economy, which outpaced the energy supply capacity of major market suppliers, as well as (ii) the severing of the European Union\u2019s relations with Russia, as a direct consequence of the political context created by the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine\u2014depriving the EEA of one of its largest energy suppliers up to that point.<\/strong><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In this context, energy prices rose dramatically in a relatively short period of time, with crude oil reaching an all-time high (ATH) for the first time since 2008. Europe found itself in an extremely vulnerable position, given that our primary source of gas supply was Russia, resulting in economic growth that fell far short of projections due to the inability of both individuals and businesses to bear the costs of energy inflation.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Since all Member States have been negatively affected by the current energy crisis, the European Union has faced pressure from both individuals and, in particular, from SMEs to provide solutions to energy inflation, in the form of state aid to cover these costs without directly leading to the impoverishment of the population, the bankruptcy of companies, and, consequently, the slowdown or collapse of the economies of Member States.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The EU has taken the view that the response to the energy crisis must be <u>unified <\/u>and <u>well-coordinated <\/u>at the Member State level, within a pre-established framework, since uncoordinated and unaligned national measures could create the conditions for destabilizing the internal energy market, jeopardizing security of supply, and thereby leading to additional inflation in the Member States most severely affected by the crisis.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Consequently, it was deemed appropriate to <strong>take exceptional, temporary measures <\/strong>by introducing a <strong>solidarity levy <\/strong>on EU companies and permanent establishments operating in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors, in an effort to mitigate the direct economic effects of rising energy prices on public budgets, end consumers, and companies within the Union.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Trends in European Legislation<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>The Legal Framework Established by the European Union<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The solidarity contribution was conceived as an <em>appropriate means of addressing windfall profits in the event of unforeseen circumstances<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\"><strong>[1]<\/strong><\/a><\/em> . Thus, it was considered that the profits earned by Union companies and permanent establishments operating in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors could not have been achieved <u>under normal conditions <\/u>had the unforeseeable events in the energy markets not occurred. Furthermore, the main causes that led to the disruption of the energy markets (<em>i.e.<\/em>,<em> the COVID-19 pandemic and the armed conflict in Russia and Ukraine<\/em>) are also considered to be unforeseeable and extraordinary events.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Thus, without substantially changing their cost structure or increasing their investments, companies in Member States, as well as their permanent establishments that generate at least 75% of their revenue from activities in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors have seen an increase in profits due to the sudden and unforeseeable circumstances of the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the reduction in energy supplies, and the increase in demand resulting from extremely high temperatures.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Consequently, the introduction of this solidarity contribution is viewed as a joint, coordinated, and contextually necessary measure that enables the generation of additional revenue at the national level, with the aim of providing financial support to households and businesses severely affected by rising energy prices, under fair competitive conditions throughout the Union. The contribution is intended to serve as a redistributive measure to ensure that companies falling within its scope (<em>companies that have earned windfall profits as a result of unforeseen circumstances<\/em>) contribute proportionally to addressing the energy crisis in the internal market.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The basis for calculating the solidarity contribution is the taxable profits of companies and permanent establishments that are tax residents in the EU, in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors, as defined in bilateral treaties or in the national tax laws of Member States for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2022, and\/or January 1, 2023, or after those dates, and for their entire respective duration. The fiscal year is determined by reference to the rules in force under the national laws of the Member States.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>According to the regulation, only profits earned in 2022 and\/or 2023 <u>that exceed a 20% increase in average taxable profits <\/u>generated over the four fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, will be subject to the solidarity contribution. The rationale behind this provision is to ensure that a portion of the profit margin\u2014 namely that which is not attributable to unforeseeable developments caused by the aforementioned <em>un <\/em>d<em> circumstances<\/em>, can be used by EU companies and their permanent establishments for future investments or to ensure their financial stability during the current energy crisis, including for energy-intensive industries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Union recommends that the solidarity contribution be used for:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>financial support measures for end-use energy consumers, and in particular vulnerable households, to mitigate the effects of high energy prices;<\/li>\n<li>financial support measures to help reduce energy consumption;<\/li>\n<li>financial support measures to assist businesses in energy-intensive industries; and<\/li>\n<li>financial support measures to develop the Union\u2019s energy autonomy. Member States should also be allowed to allocate a portion of the proceeds from the temporary solidarity contribution to joint financing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Accordingly, Regulation No. 2022\/1854 of October 6, 2022, on an emergency measure to address high energy prices was adopted, in which, among the definitions provided, we note:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"638\"><em>15. \u201cUnion company\u201d means a company established in a Member State which, in accordance with the tax legislation of that Member State, is considered to be resident in that Member State for tax purposes and, under a double taxation agreement concluded with a third country, is not considered to be resident for tax purposes outside the Union; <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>16. \u201cpermanent establishment\u201d means any fixed place of business situated in a Member State through which the business of a company established in another State is wholly or partly carried on, to the extent that the profits of the fixed place of business are taxable in the Member State in which it is situated; <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>17. \u201cUnion companies and permanent establishments engaged in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors\u201d means Union companies or permanent establishments that derive at least 75 % of their turnover from economic activities in the fields of extraction, mining, crude oil refining, or the manufacture of coke products, as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1893\/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 10)<\/em>;<\/p>\n<p><em>18. \u201cexcess profits\u201d means taxable profits, as determined under national tax rules for the fiscal years 2022 and\/or 2023 and throughout their duration, derived from activities of Union companies and permanent establishments operating in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors that exceed by more than 20 % the average taxable profits from the four fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2018; <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>19. \u201csolidarity contribution\u201d means a temporary measure designed to address excess profits of Union companies and permanent establishments operating in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors, in order to mitigate exceptional price developments in energy markets for the benefit of Member States, consumers, and companies;<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The solidarity contribution is addressed in Chapter III of the Regulation\u2014Measures Concerning the Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Coal, and Refining Sectors\u2014which sets forth in Articles 14\u201318: <strong>(i) <\/strong>the purpose of the contribution, namely the support provided to end-use energy consumers through the contribution, <strong>(ii) <\/strong>the basis for calculating the temporary solidarity contribution, <strong>(iii) <\/strong>the rate for calculating the temporary solidarity contribution, <strong>(iv) <\/strong>the manner of allocation and use of the proceeds from the solidarity contribution, as well as <strong>(v) <\/strong>the explicit provision regarding the exceptional and temporary nature of the solidarity contribution.<\/p>\n<p>We consider it relevant to note the following provisions:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"638\"><strong>Art. 15 \u2013 Basis for Calculating the Temporary Solidarity Contribution<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>The temporary solidarity contribution for companies in the Union and permanent establishments conducting activities in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors\u2014including those that are part of a consolidated group solely for tax purposes\u2014is calculated based on taxable profits, as determined under national tax rules, in the 2022 fiscal year and\/or the 2023 fiscal year and throughout the duration of those years, that exceed by more than 20% the average of taxable profits, as determined under national tax rules, for the four fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2018, or occurring after that date. If the average taxable profit for those four fiscal years is negative, for the purposes of calculating the temporary solidarity contribution, the average taxable profit shall be deemed to be zero.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Art. 16 \u2013 Rate for Calculating the Temporary Solidarity Contribution<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Rate for Calculating the Temporary Solidarity Contribution (1) The rate applicable for calculating the temporary solidarity contribution shall be at least 33% of the base referred to in Article 15. (2) The temporary solidarity contribution shall apply in addition to the ordinary taxes and duties applicable under the domestic law of a Member State.<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Trends in the Application of Regulation No. 2022\/1854 in Member States<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Member States have been given the freedom to establish their solidarity contribution in accordance with current needs and in line with national legislation, in order to address the domestic consequences of the energy crisis.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Although most Member States have opted for a rate for calculating the contribution that is close to the minimum set by the Regulation (including Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Portugal, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, and others), some Member States have implemented stricter conditions for applying the solidarity levy, either with regard to the rate used to calculate the contribution or with regard to the entities to which the levy may be applied (by expanding the sectors or business activities of the targeted companies).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>One such example is Hungary, which has expanded the scope of the levy to include banks, telecommunications, and airlines\u2014in addition to the energy sector. Another example of the expansion of the solidarity levy\u2019s scope is Belgium, which also includes companies that derive revenue from the sale of finished products, specifically fuel, to the end consumer.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Romania is one of the countries whose measures are considered strict, applying a 60% rate for calculating the contribution. Furthermore, unlike the provisions of the Regulation, Romania extends the scope of taxpayers to include persons affiliated with the main described in Article 15 of the Regulation, as well as the affiliates of these affiliated persons, under certain conditions set forth in national legislation.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Member States: Not Exactly a Warm Welcome<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Undoubtedly, we believe that no one would have expected such a levy to be welcomed with open arms, especially by the taxpayers to whom it applies. The introduction of the solidarity levy on windfall profits earned by companies in the EU\u2019s energy sector has drawn both the condemnation of all affected companies and a series of civil lawsuits filed against it.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The American giant <strong>Exxon Mobil <\/strong>kicked off the wave of resistance against the imposition of the solidarity levy in the fossil fuel sector by filing a lawsuit against the European Commission to block the application of the levy introduced by Regulation No. 2022\/1854. Exxon enjoys the tacit support of <strong>Shell<\/strong>, <strong>Chevron<\/strong>, <strong>Total Energies, <\/strong>and <strong>BP<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit, filed through its subsidiaries in Germany and the Netherlands, challenges the European Commission\u2019s authority and jurisdiction to regulate and introduce such a levy, with Exxon arguing that this prerogative rests exclusively with member states. Exxon argues, among other things, that such a levy undermines investor confidence in a predictable business environment, thereby discouraging future investment. Specifically, in the medium to long term, imposing this levy could set the stage for further price increases, as it would require even greater imports of energy and fuels.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>MOL <\/strong>and its Slovak subsidiary <strong>Slovnaft <\/strong>are pursuing a lawsuit against the Slovak government over the application of the solidarity levy, as the company suspects that the manner in which it was adopted is intended to impose an excessive tax on the company, which is owned by Hungarian shareholders<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> . Initially, the levy rate had been set at 70%, but it was lowered to 55% as a result of pressure from Slovnaft. Furthermore, under the original terms, the levy was to be paid through 2025, but was reduced\u2014thanks to Slovnaft\u2014for only one year.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>MOL considers it appropriate to file such a claim with the arbitration court in Washington, following the example set by Exxon Mobil.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In a similar vein, at the end of February, the Spanish oil and gas company <strong>Repsol <\/strong>announced its intention to challenge the solidarity contribution imposed by the Spanish government, arguing that it is inconsistent with both domestic law\u2014specifically violating the Spanish Constitution\u2014and EU law. <strong>Iberdrola<\/strong>, Spain\u2019s largest energy company, has also joined this effort.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In response, Spanish Finance Minister Mar\u00eda Jes\u00fas Montero stated that the government is simply promoting \u201ctax justice,\u201d noting that it is only natural for those with the highest incomes to make an \u201ceffort\u201d for the good of society.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>To date, the courts of member states have not sided with companies in the energy sector, with most lawsuits and appeals having been dismissed or suspended. Among other things, the European Commission maintains that the measures are fully in line with EU law.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>National Legal Framework<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Emergency Ordinance No. 186\/2022<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>EU Regulation No. 2022\/1854 required the adoption of the specified measures by December 31, 2022, and consequently, <strong>Emergency Ordinance No. 186\/2022 <\/strong>was adopted regarding certain measures to implement EU Council Regulation No. 2022\/1854 of October 6, 2022, on an emergency intervention to address the issue of high energy prices.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The main purpose of the ordinance is the national implementation of EU Regulation No. 2022\/1854, and thus the introduction of a solidarity contribution\/tax for companies in the European Union and permanent establishments operating in the crude oil, natural gas, coal, and refining sectors; this contribution is temporary and exceptional in nature.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The ordinance applies to the following entities for the purpose of paying the contribution:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Commercial companies engaged in activities under the following CAEN codes:<strong> 0610 <\/strong>\u2013 \u201cExtraction of crude oil,\u201d<strong> 0620 <\/strong>\u2013 \u201cExtraction of natural gas,\u201d<strong> 0510 <\/strong>\u2013 \u201cExtraction of coal,\u201d<strong> 1910 <\/strong>\u2013 \u201cManufacture of coke products,\u201d and<strong> 1920 <\/strong>\u2013 \u201cManufacture of petroleum refining products\u201d <strong>and <\/strong>for which these activities account for 75% or more of their total revenue<\/li>\n<li>Entities subject to corporate income tax and microenterprise income tax that <u>are affiliated <\/u>with the taxpayers referred to in the preceding paragraph, when they derive at least 50% of their 2022 or 2023 revenue, respectively, from transactions with affiliated entities<\/li>\n<li>Entities subject to corporate income tax and microenterprise income tax <u>that are affiliated with the entities <\/u>referred to in point 2, when they generate at least 50% of their 2022 or 2023 revenue, respectively, from transactions with affiliated entities<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>According to the provisions of the Tax Code, the following legal entities are considered <strong>affiliated entities<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A legal entity is affiliated with another legal entity if the former holds, directly or indirectly\u2014including holdings of affiliated entities\u2014at least 25% of the value or number of equity interests or voting rights in the other legal entity, or if it effectively controls that legal entity<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>or <\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>a legal entity is affiliated with another legal entity if a person holds, directly or indirectly\u2014including through holdings of its affiliates\u2014at least 25% of the value or number of equity interests or voting rights in both the first and second legal entities, or if that person effectively controls them<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"638\"><strong><em>Excess<\/em><\/strong><strong><em> profit <\/em><\/strong><em>is the profit that exceeds by more than 20% the average of taxable profits, as determined under national tax rules, for the four fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2018, or occurring after that date.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The amount of the solidarity contribution provided for by national provisions shall be<strong> 60%<\/strong>, calculated in accordance with the guidelines set forth in <strong>Article 2 <\/strong>of the Ordinance<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The contribution is calculated, reported, and paid annually <strong>by June 25 of the following year <\/strong>or <strong>by the 25th of the sixth month following the end of the modified fiscal year or different financial year<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Amounts representing the solidarity contribution shall be paid into a separate, readily available account in lei, opened at the State Treasury offices within the competent central tax authorities, identified by the taxpayer\u2019s tax identification number.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Subsequent Legislative Process<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>After a somewhat difficult legislative process\u2014involving several reexaminations\u2014<strong>Law No. 119\/2023 <\/strong>was finally adopted to approve Government Emergency Ordinance No. 186\/2022 on certain measures to implement Council Regulation (EU) 2022\/1,854 of the Council of October 6, 2022, on an emergency response to address high energy prices.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In addition to approving the Emergency Ordinance, the Law expands the scope of application of the solidarity tax by including additional categories of taxpayers, under certain conditions, as well as a different calculation method for the newly included taxpayers.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Thus, the scope of application is extended to entities subject to corporate income tax or micro-enterprise income tax that <strong>(i) <\/strong>carry out activities in the sectors specified by EU Regulation 2022\/1854 <strong><u>and <\/u>(ii) <\/strong>engage <u>in both <\/u>crude oil <u>extraction and refining activities<\/u>. For this category of taxpayers, it is no longer necessary to meet the conditions regarding the proportion of the activity in total revenue, as this is an exceptional category of taxpayers.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The contribution owed by the newly included taxpayers is calculated separately, with a fixed amount of 350 lei per metric ton of crude oil processed in refining operations.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the Law introduces another exception to the calculation of the contribution, concerning taxpayers who did not generate production from the fields specified in Article 1(1) of the Ordinance\u2014for reference, the taxpayers described in the first subparagraph of paragraph 6\u2014during the 2018\u20132021 period, taxpayers who will be <u>exempt <\/u>from paying the solidarity tax.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Red flags\u2014are they truly present or merely fictitious?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Observing the national legislative process for implementing the exceptional solidarity contribution tax, it has exhibited extreme tendencies at every stage of implementation, manifested by <strong>(i) <\/strong>the high rate used to calculate the contribution, <strong>(ii) <\/strong>the two-year period of applicability of the contribution,<strong> (iii) <\/strong>the ambiguous definition of the group of taxpayers subject to the solidarity tax, as well as <strong>(iv) <\/strong>constant political pressure to expand the group of taxpayers required to pay the solidarity tax.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Since this is an exceptional levy\u2014and therefore inherently temporary\u2014and given the conditions under which it is implemented compared to other Member States, we can objectively consider Romania\u2019s approach to be excessive, placing a burdensome financial burden on companies operating in the energy sector.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In the context of the energy crisis, mitigating the imbalance between supply and demand should have been aimed exclusively at assisting the disadvantaged population genuinely affected by rising energy prices\u2014assistance that should have been immediate and effective\u2014especially during the winter of 2022\u20132023, when the danger was imminent.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Following the European trend that has leaned toward rejecting the legitimacy of the solidarity tax that was introduced\u2014in the absence of European case law (to date), as well as in the absence of methodological guidelines for establishing the framework for implementing the solidarity tax in national legislation\u2014 the official interpretation by the tax authorities will also take shape as the first payment deadline approaches at the end of June.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> Explanatory Memorandum to EU Regulation No. 2022\/1854 of October 6, 2022, on an emergency measure to address high energy prices<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> The suspicion stems from statements made by former Finance Minister Igor Matovi\u010d, who described this levy as a measure through which Slovakia would be able to extract more money from Hungarian property owners.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-57642","legal_developments","type-legal_developments","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_developments\/57642","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_developments"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/legal_developments"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}