{"id":51854,"date":"2025-09-05T10:30:30","date_gmt":"2025-09-05T10:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/?post_type=legal_developments&#038;p=51854"},"modified":"2025-09-05T10:31:01","modified_gmt":"2025-09-05T10:31:01","slug":"colombian-wealth-tax-planning-opportunity-under-the-can-framework","status":"publish","type":"legal_developments","link":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/thought-leadership\/colombian-wealth-tax-planning-opportunity-under-the-can-framework\/","title":{"rendered":"Colombian Wealth Tax Planning Opportunity Under the CAN Framework"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>By Catalina Jaramillo, Daniel Duque, and Andr\u00e9s Hern\u00e1ndez, Partners, and Jos\u00e9 Manuel Garc\u00eda, Associate, Tax Practice, Brigard Urrutia<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>In brief:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>In the increasingly complex arena of international taxation, one ruling by the Andean Court of Justice (TJCA) could significantly reshape how Colombia\u2019s wealth tax (WT) applies to assets located in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru. For high-net-worth individuals and some investors, this interpretation offers both an opportunity and a cautionary roadmap for cross-border structuring within the Andean Community of Nations (CAN).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In today\u2019s globalized economy, jurisdictions compete aggressively for the right to tax assets\u2014debating not only <em>how<\/em> to tax, but also <em>who<\/em> has the primary authority to do so. The Colombian wealth tax\u2014reintroduced by Congress in 2023 after several previous iterations\u2014targets the <strong>worldwide net worth<\/strong> of tax resident\u2019s individuals, regardless of asset location. This approach aligns with a regional trend driven by the digitalization and high mobility of financial assets, which now comprise a substantial portion of global wealth.<\/p>\n<p>The taxable event is triggered by the possession of net assets as of January 1 each year, exceeding COP 3,585,528,000 (approximately USD 876,000). Rates range from 0.5% to 1.5%, depending on the net assets.<\/p>\n<p>Historically, both individuals and corporations have responded to the WT by adopting complex corporate structures to re-domicile assets and optimize tax exposure. Nowadays the Colombian WT only applies to individual.<\/p>\n<p>Colombia has addressed some of these scenarios through bilateral double taxation treaties (DTTs) with jurisdictions such as Spain, Mexico, and France. However, the position of CAN member states\u2014Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru\u2014remained unclear.<\/p>\n<p>This lack of clarity led to numerous disputes, as tax authorities claimed the right to tax and audit assets located in other CAN states that did not impose a wealth tax. A recent TJCA ruling has now brought greater certainty, making Colombia a more attractive environment for regional investment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Key Takeaways from the TJCA ruling<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>CAN Decision 578 applies to WT<\/strong>, regardless of its legal designation.<\/li>\n<li>Taxpayers are not required to prove payment or filing of the WT in their residence country (CAN) to avoid double taxation.<\/li>\n<li>There is no tax evasion when the source-country authority opts not to levy, enforce, or collect the tax; such inaction does not grant taxing rights to another CAN state.<\/li>\n<li>The purpose of Decision 578 is to prevent two CAN states from taxing the same wealth or income.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Avoidance<\/strong> occurs only when the taxpayer <strong>consciously and deliberately<\/strong> fails to pay a tax owed to the CAN member state with exclusive taxing authority.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Example:<\/strong><br \/>\nIf State A has no authority to tax assets located in State B (the source country), that restriction applies even if State B does not levy or collect the tax.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Case Spotlight: TELCO v. DIAN<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Colombian tax authority (DIAN) challenged Telecommunication Company\u2019s (TELCO) WT 2011 filing, alleging it excluded from the taxable base shares held in TELCO Per\u00fa. The Colombian Council of State (\u201cCE\u201d) upheld DIAN\u2019s position, disregarding the TJCA\u2019s interpretation. Under the new ruling, TELCO may now have grounds to seek a review.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Practical Recommendations for Affected Taxpayers<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Engage specialized counsel early.<\/strong> If you reported CAN-based assets in your Colombian WT filing, assess whether an amendment could reduce liability. Under Colombian law, amendments that lower tax must be filed within one year.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Act promptly in ongoing disputes.<\/strong> Evaluate whether the TJCA\u2019s interpretation strengthens your defense in cases involving potential CAN double taxation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shape the legal precedent.<\/strong> The CE has yet to apply this interpretation; early cases could define future jurisprudence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plan with foresight.<\/strong> If you or your company operates or holds assets in CAN jurisdictions, review whether restructuring can mitigate future WT exposure and avoid potential classification as tax evasion.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Looking Ahead<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The TJCA\u2019s decision marks a pivotal moment in the regional tax landscape. It reinforces the principle that taxing rights within CAN must respect jurisdictional boundaries, offering taxpayers both a shield against overreach and a framework for lawful structuring. For businesses and individuals alike, the challenge\u2014and the opportunity\u2014now lies in <strong>turning legal clarity into strategic advantage<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Article by:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Catalina Jaramillo (<a href=\"mailto:cjaramillo@bu.com.co\">cjaramillo@bu.com.co<\/a>), Daniel Duque (<a href=\"mailto:dduque@bu.com.co\">dduque@bu.com.co<\/a>) and Andr\u00e9s Hern\u00e1ndez (<a href=\"mailto:ahernandez@bu.com.co\">ahernandez@bu.com.co<\/a>), <em>Partners<\/em>, and Jos\u00e9 Manuel Garc\u00eda (<a href=\"mailto:jgarciaa@bu.com.co\">jgarciaa@bu.com.co<\/a>), <em>Associate<\/em>, Tax Practice, Brigard Urrutia<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-51854","legal_developments","type-legal_developments","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_developments\/51854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_developments"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/legal_developments"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/developments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}