Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

United States > Industry focus > Transport: aviation and air travel - litigation > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings


Index of tables

  1. Transport: aviation and air travel - litigation
  2. Leading lawyers

Leading lawyers

  1. 1

Who Represents Who

Find out which law firms are representing which Transport: aviation and air travel - litigation clients in United States using The Legal 500's new comprehensive database of law firm/client relationships. Instantly search over 925,000 relationships, including over 83,000 Fortune 500, 46,000 FTSE350 and 13,000 DAX 30 relationships globally. Access is free for in-house lawyers, and by subscription for law firms. For more information, contact


Arnold & Porter is among the premier firms handling litigation arising from catastrophic aircraft crashes. Clients include Airbus and its affiliates, for which the team handles claims relating to fatal crashes; in a recent mandate, Houston-based Thad Dameris represented Airbus in consolidated claims concerning an incident in which more than 100 individuals died. The team has also represented Airbus in personal injury claims regarding exposure to "bleed air", as well as contractual disputes. Christopher Odell (also based in Houston) and Washington DC-based David Weiner also have experience in crash litigation and international arbitration. Other key clients include the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and Piaggio.

Trusted Advisor - with Finnegan

IP specialist Finnegan detail how their collaborative approach makes for a unique culture which is designed to allow them to work with clients in a way which is cognizant of the challenges facing all companies today.

Condon & Forsyth LLP is ‘among the premier firms in the world for aviation liability claims’. Acting primarily for major air carriers, the ‘large and uniquely experienced’ team handles a wide range of aviation disputes, from class action claims arising from flight delay and product liability to catastrophic crash litigation. From the Los Angeles office, Scott Cunningham defended Asiana Airlines and China Airlines in claims by a group of homeowners living beneath a flight path alleging violations of noise limitations and various FAA regulations. New York-based Bart Banino is representing TACA Airlines in numerous multi-jurisdictional claims arising from a crash in which more than 130 people perished. Stephen Stegich and John Maggio are highly recommended contacts in New York and Miami, respectively; Stegich has experience in substantial product liability claims, while Maggio is defending an airline in a culturally sensitive administrative investigation.

Jones Day’s cross-office department has extensive experience of a variety of aviation disputes, including fatal crash litigation. It also handles a range of ADR matters. Pittsburgh-based practice head John Goetz recently represented Hainan Airlines in mediation arising from claims of negligence and breach of contract. Goetz is also representing Chinese Airlines in litigation arising from a mid-air collision at a flight academy. Based in Houston, Bruce McDonald co-led an international team that represented Air China in class action litigation concerning alleged conspiratorial imposition of fuel surcharges on air cargo shipments. Based in Irvine and Cleveland, respectively, John Vogt and Richard Bedell have experience of product liability claims.

Clyde & Co LLP regularly handles product liability and aircraft disaster litigation for airlines, parts manufacturers and insurers. The New York-based Jeffrey Ellis represented Consumer Technology Association and AUVSI, two UAS groups, in a challenge regarding federal pre-emption of drone flight regulation. Ellis is also acting for United Airlines in long-running civil claims arising out of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Other key figures include the San Francisco-based Kevin Sutherland, who represented AIG in litigation arising from a mid-air collision; Andrew Harakas in New York, who has handled crash litigation and passenger injury claims for clients such as Etihad Airways, Japan Airlines and Air China; and the Miami-based Thompson Thornton.

Morrison & Foerster LLP is ‘extremely knowledgeable of the aviation industry’ and is praised for its expertise in product liability claims. The key figure in the firm’s litigation aviation group is San Diego-based William O’Connor, who has extensive experience of the helicopter industry and regulatory investigations. In 2017, O’Connor acted as primary counsel to Amazon Prime Air in relation to liability and emergency response concerns. Additionally, O’Connor has been involved in insurance litigation following a highly-publicized aircraft disaster. The team is also uniquely experienced in acting for and against airport-proprietors, and represented the City of Santa Monica in complex proceedings against the FAA regarding the right of the city to close its airport.

Nixon Peabody LLP’s aviation litigation team ‘combines excellent knowledge of the aviation industry with a deep understanding of the client’s needs’. The group has considerable expertise in helicopter crash litigation and grounding claims. New York-based partners Joseph Ortego and Eric Strain represented Airbus Helicopters in multiple claims regarding the fatal crash of a news helicopter. The team also defended Deutsche Lufthansa in a liability claim regarding a passenger heart attack. San Francisco-based Brian Dalrymple is representing an aircraft operator in a multimillion-dollar aircraft damage claim following an accident, and is also involved in a high-profile fatal crash case.

O'Melveny & Myers LLP has represented the majority of major US airlines in securities and antitrust litigation, personal injury claims and labor and employment disputes. Indeed, Los Angeles-based Robert Siegel has extensive experience of labor and employment issues in the aviation industry and is representing Spirit Airlines in a dispute with its pilots concerning the pilots’ disruption of service during collective bargaining negotiations. In the New York office, Mark Robertson defended American Airlines in a dispute arising from the highly publicized forced removal of a passenger. Ben Bradshaw is a contact in the Washington DC office.

Reed Smith LLP is ‘among the leading firms in aviation litigation, especially in the areas of product liability and personal injury’. Acting primarily for major airlines and aircraft manufacturers, Princeton-based Patrick Bradley is representing an aircraft manufacturer in a litany of personal injury and wrongful death claims. In the New York office, Oliver Beiersdorf has represented a major airline in a variety of disputes, including a passenger dispute alleging, among other grievances, false arrest and negligence at the hands of one of the airline’s contractors. Julia Trankiem joined Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP in 2018.

The team at Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP handles a wide variety of aviation disputes, which in 2017 included major disaster litigation, passenger incidents and UAS-related disputes. The Philadelphia-based Denny Shupe represented a UAS manufacturer in a case concerning the operation of a drone on a US Army fort, and acted alongside Robert Williams (also based in Philadelphia) for an engine manufacturer in multiple fatal crash cases. New York-based Barry Alexander advised a major air carrier on a liability claim following an alleged abduction. Jonathan Stern is a contact in the Washington DC office.

Based in Washington DC, Steptoe & Johnson LLP often appears before key transportation and aviation agencies and has particular expertise in aviation disputes with heavy regulatory aspects. Dane Jaques represented Swissport in various matters, including litigation arising from a ground accident and numerous personal injury claims. David Coburn acted for Amadeus IT in a putative class action regarding alleged uncompetitive practices. William Karas and Carol Gosain represented TAP Portugal in several claims following the forced removal of a group of unruly passengers. Japan Airlines, Travel Technology Association and American Association of Travel Agents are additional clients.

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Sulphur Cap Ahead - Regulatory

    Sulphur Cap Ahead - Regulatory

    The British Virgin Islands are rushing to pass by the end of December the new economic substance legislation to avoid the EU’s blacklist of tax haven jurisdictions.
  • Chambers Guides - Insurance 2018 - India

    India is a common-law jurisdiction. In general, Indian laws borrow heavily from, and are based on, English law. However, insurance law in India has certain unique features that deviate from English insurance law. The primary legislation of insurance law in India is the Insurance Act, 1938 (the “Insurance Act”) and the Insurance Rules, 1939 (the “Insurance Rules”).
  • AVELLUM advised largest Ukrainian brick manufacturer on restructuring and refinancing of its debt

    AVELLUM acted as the Ukrainian legal counsel to Private Joint Stock Company with Foreign Investments “Slobozhanska Budivelna Keramika” (“SBK ”) in connection with the restructuring and refinancing of SBK’s debt, valued at approximately EUR20 million. Atlas Advisors, an independent investment banking firm, acted as the exclusive financial advisor to the SBK’s shareholders in connection with the restructuring of the credit portfolio, attraction of financing for the debt’s refinancing, and buy-out of SBK’s shares.
  • AVELLUM advises on Ukraine’s USD2 billion Eurobond issue

    AVELLUM acted as the Ukrainian legal counsel to the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine on the USD2 billion sovereign Eurobond issue consisting of two tranches with 5.5 and 10-year tenor. J.P. Morgan Securities, Goldman Sachs, BNP Paribas, and Citigroup acted as joint lead managers on the transaction.
  • New Anti-Money Laundering Law

    The new anti-money laundering ( AML ) law of the UAE took effect at the end of October 2018. Containing features recommended by the Financial Action Task Force ( FATF ), the new law introduces subtle but important changes to the AML landscape in the UAE. 
  • Confidentiality Under Renewed Focus

    The UAE federal government has recently issued a raft of important legislation, addressing and in many ways updating areas of law that are key to businesses in the jurisdiction. Amongst this legislation is Federal Decree-Law 14 of 2018 concerning the central bank and the organisation of financial institutions and activities (the New Banking Law ) and Federal Decree-Law 20 of 2018 concerning anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing (the New AML Law ). Both the New Banking Law and the New AML Law repeal and replace the previous legislation on their respective subjects. Importantly, the New Banking Law and the New AML Law have together enhanced the protection afforded to confidential information under UAE law, in particular where financial and legal service providers and their customers and clients are concerned. 
  • Israel Chapter in The Virtual Currency Regulation Review

    Earlier this year, the Israel Tax Authority (ITA) issued two circulars, one on the taxation of digital tokens and the second addressing the taxation of utility tokens in initial coin offerings (ICOs). Additionally, in March, the Israel Securities Authority (ISA) released a detailed interim report by the Committee for the Regulation of Public Offerings of Decentralized Cryptocurrency Coins (Report) (with a follow-up report due to come out around October 2018). Moreover, it is expected that before the end of 2018, legislation will come into force that for the first time will see Israeli primary legislation define virtual currencies as financial assets and mandate licensing for related services, as is later discussed in detail.
  • GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte – Report on authorized dealer’s entitlement to compensation

    Under certain circumstances, an authorized dealer may be entitled to claim compensation after termination of the contract with the company if the latter continues to be able to use its business contacts.
  • The Intra-Corporate Transfer Regulations

    The Conditions of Entry and Residence of Third-Country Nationals in the Framework of an Intra-Corporate Transfer Regulations (“Regulations”) were brought into force through Subsidiary Legislation 217.21. These Regulations transpose EU Directive 2014/66/EU into Maltese law.

Press Releases worldwide

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to