Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

United States > Dispute resolution > Product liability, mass tort and class action: toxic tort - plaintiff > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings

Editorial

Index of tables

  1. Product liability, mass tort and class action: toxic tort - plaintiff
  2. Leading lawyers

Leading lawyers

  1. 1
    • Russell Budd - Baron & Budd, P.C.
    • Robert Gordon - Weitz & Luxenberg PC
    • Perry Weitz - Weitz & Luxenberg PC

Who Represents Who

Find out which law firms are representing which Product liability, mass tort and class action: toxic tort - plaintiff clients in United States using The Legal 500's new comprehensive database of law firm/client relationships. Instantly search over 925,000 relationships, including over 83,000 Fortune 500, 46,000 FTSE350 and 13,000 DAX 30 relationships globally. Access is free for in-house lawyers, and by subscription for law firms. For more information, contact david.burgess@legal500.com.

CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE WHO REPRESENTS WHO SITE

Trusted Advisor - with Finnegan

IP specialist Finnegan detail how their collaborative approach makes for a unique culture which is designed to allow them to work with clients in a way which is cognizant of the challenges facing all companies today.

Baron & Budd, P.C. continues to handle a diverse range of environmental litigation brought against high-profile companies, covering water contamination, PCB and Proposition 65-related cases. Dallas-based environmental litigation head Scott Summy has been acting as co-counsel to the State of Rhode Island in an MTBE groundwater contamination lawsuit brought against nearly three dozen oil companies. Also in Dallas, John Fiske has been leading the representations for the city of Portland in a lawsuit brought against Monsanto before Oregon District Court regarding widespread PCB contamination in various Portland water bodies, including the Willamette River and Columbia Slough. The firm continues to act for plaintiffs in various litigation, including the Porter Ranch gas leak and Butte Wildfire lawsuits. Co-founder Russell Budd and of counsel Mark Pifko are recommended in the firm’s Dallas and Los Angeles offices respectively.

New York-based firm Napoli Shkolnik PLLC excels in representing plaintiffs in a broad range of environmental and asbestos litigation, including personal injury and mass tort work. The firm continues to represent a number of plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit concerning the high-profile Flint water crisis in Michigan. It has also been acting for plaintiffs in the Wheatfield lawsuit arising from claims of chemical contamination from the Niagara Sanitation Landfill site. The group has also been acting for military personnel who resided in Camp Lejeune, North Carolina between 1953 and 1987 in a water contamination case. Key partners include Marie Napoli, Hunter Shkolnik and of counsel Paul Napoli.

Weitz & Luxenberg PC specializes in bringing asbestos, water contamination and other environmental lawsuits against members of the oil and gas industry. New York-based of counsel Robin Greenwald, who heads the environmental pollution group, has been leading the team in representing a number of plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit filed in Payne County, Oklahoma concerning claims of fracking-induced earthquakes. In Cherry Hill, Jerry Kristal obtained a $75m verdict for two plaintiffs in asbestos litigation brought against Dana Companies and Fel-Pro, which were among other defendants that previously settled. Associate Danny Kraft in New York successfully won a $12.5m verdict brought against Caterpillar on behalf of an individual who developed lung cancer due to asbestos exposure. Key names include co-founder Perry Weitz and of counsel Robert Gordon, both of whom are in New York.

Motley Rice LLC has deep experience acting for plaintiffs in asbestos and toxic exposure cases. The firm has been representing various plaintiffs in long-term asbestos litigation brought against Matson regarding the deaths of three seamen caused by asbestos exposure; in 2016, a Third Circuit appellate panel overturned a 2014 decision to dismiss the lawsuit. Charleston-based associate John Guerry has been representing a former Tennessee senator in asbestos exposure litigation. Notable partners include Jodi Flowers and Joseph Rice, who continues to act for clients on the plaintiffs’ steering committee in the high-profile Volkswagen emissions fraud case. All partners are based in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina unless otherwise stated.

Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, LLC’s Mount Pleasant-based group often handles class actions and MDLs concerning asbestos and environmental litigation. Christopher Tuck represented a number of homeowners in a class action against Horry Electric following the discovery of mold growing in the plaintiffs’ shrink-wrapped homes; in 2016, the defendant’s motion to disqualify certain plaintiffs as class members was opposed and the South Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the terms of the $6m settlement. The team includes J David Butler in Barnwell, Michael Brickman in Charleston and Gregory Lofstead. Jay Ward is now at McGowan, Hood & Felder, LLC.

Simmons Hanly Conroy has deep experience handling historical asbestos and chemical exposure cases, as well as oil-related contamination work. New York-based co-head Jayne Conroy is often appointed as a member of plaintiffs’ steering committees in high-profile litigation, including the Volkswagen ‘clean diesel’ MDL. In Alton, Illinois founder John Simmons concentrates on asbestos litigation. The firm is also led by Michael Angelides in Alton and New York-based Paul Hanly, whose experience prior to joining the firm included serving as national trial and settlement counsel to corporations in asbestos litigation. Paul Lesko is now at Peiffer Rosca Wolf Abdullah Carr & Kane.

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

The Legal 500 United States - Events

GC Powerlist -
United States

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • EU and Malta Securitisation Market

    Following the US subprime crisis that began in 2007, the notion of securitisation has suffered from bad press that tainted its reputation. However, securitisation is still considered as an essential component to continued economic recovery and for well-functioning financial markets.
  • PATENTABILITY OF SOFTWARE IN SINGAPORE

     leading_lines_newsletter_dec_2017
  • DOJ Makes the Pilot Program Permanent and Announces FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy

    The US Department of Justice ("DOJ") had announced a pilot program [1] ("Pilot Program") on April 5, 2016, which created new mitigation opportunities for companies that (i) voluntarily self-disclosed, (ii) cooperated fully, and (iii) took timely and appropriate remedial actions in FCPA matters that fell within the Fraud Section's mandate. The Pilot Program was to remain in effect for 1 year, starting from the day of its announcement. On March 10, 2017, the Acting Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth A. Blanco, announced in a speech that the Pilot Program would continue in full force until the DOJ reached a final decision on whether to extend it, and what revisions, if any, should be made to it. [2] The evaluation period of the Pilot Program ended on November 29, 2017, when Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced the new FCPA Enforcement Policy ("Policy"), which effectively makes the Pilot Program permanent with some revisions. According to Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, the FCPA Unit received 30 voluntary disclosures during the time period that the Pilot Program was in force, as opposed to 18 voluntary disclosures that were received during the previous 18-month period. The Policy has been incorporated into the United States Attorneys' Manual in order to "be readily understood and easily applied by busy prosecutors" as opposed to being promulgated in memorandum format. [3]
  • Effects of State of Emergency Law in Turkey On Prison Sentences Under Criminal Execution Laws

    With the Statutory Decree No.671 dated August 17, 2016, and the recent changes with Regulations No.29987 and No.29824 on Regulation Regarding an Amendment on Placement to Open Punishment Execution Facilities effecting execution of the Law No.5275 on Punishment Execution Law has introduced significant changes.
  • [SOUTH KOREA] Supreme Court Affirms Lower Decision, Finding Invalid the Regulations on Foreign ...

    Supreme Court Affirms Lower Court Decision, Finding Invalid the Regulations on Foreign Exchange Report on Incorporation of Offshore Subsidiary by an Offshore Company
  • Disputes on Health-Related Commercial Advertisements under Consumer Law

    Introduction
  • [SOUTH KOREA] New Administration’s Key Environmental Policies

    To step forward as an environment-friendly government, the Moon Jae-in Administration has announced its key environmental policies, including improving safety in chemical substances and household chemical products, and reinforcing implementation measures of the Paris Agreement.  Under the “sustainable development” paradigm, the new administration will continually promote new regulations to protect the environment and strengthen its enforcement of environmental regulations.
  • [SOUTH KOREA] Lower Court Issues Favorable Decision for 27,000 KIA Motors Employees in an ...

    Lower Court Issues Favorable Decision for 27,000 KIA Motors Employees in an Ordinary Wage Case 
  • SyCipLaw TMT Bulletin: “More Philippine Data Privacy Act: Are you Ready for Phase II?”

    Controllers and processors who have completed Phase I registration with the National Privacy Commission (NPC) will now have to gear up for Phase II. Phase II involves providing the NPC certain information on the organization’s compliance with the Data Privacy Act (DPA).
  • Crowdfunding - The Path towards a regulatory Framework

      The importance and feasibility of crowdfunding platforms is increasing in stature and importance for current and future the entrepreneurs. Malta has recently acceded to the rising trend by creating its first crowdfunding platform, ZAAR, a reward-based crowdfunding platform who has recently been awarded with the first prize in its section at the National Enterprise Support Awards 2016 also as well as being one of the local projects that have represented Malta at the European Enterprise Promotion Awards 2016, held in Slovakia. Nonetheless start-ups based in Malta with global aspirations often rely on international platforms. An increase in interest has emerged amongst the art and culture community as well in social entrepreneurship projects. Crowdfunding in Malta is still at the early stages of development. Despite this, there are endless opportunities for local entrepreneurs and the local business community. Research has shown that through international crowdfunding platforms, monies have been raised for projects in the field of gaming consoles, apps and software as well as for artistic projects.  Testimony to this is a new game design studio in Malta, that launched its first game, Politicks, raised financing through the crowdfunding platform Indiegogo.

Press Releases worldwide

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to