Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

United States > Dispute resolution > M&A litigation: plaintiff > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings


Index of tables

  1. M&A litigation: plaintiff
  2. Hall of Fame
  3. Leading lawyers
  4. Next generation lawyers

Leading lawyers

  1. 1

Next generation lawyers

  1. 1
    • Kimberley Evans - Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.

Who Represents Who

Find out which law firms are representing which M&A litigation: plaintiff clients in United States using The Legal 500's new comprehensive database of law firm/client relationships. Instantly search over 925,000 relationships, including over 83,000 Fortune 500, 46,000 FTSE350 and 13,000 DAX 30 relationships globally. Access is free for in-house lawyers, and by subscription for law firms. For more information, contact


New York-based plaintiff firm Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP is ‘a top-tier firm that is selective about its cases and makes defense firms take notice when it files a case’. It is regarded as a leading firm for securities class actions, antitrust, securities fraud, corporate governance matters and M&A litigation, in which it represents institutional shareholders in high-profile cases. Mark Lebovitch leads the firm’s corporate governance litigation practice and is a highly respected lawyer in shareholder derivative suits and transactional litigation. His highlights in 2017 included IAC/InterActiveCorp Derivative Action, in which he acted as co-lead counsel to challenge dual-class or multi-class stock structures that corporate founders had used to grant themselves ‘supervoting’ rights. The case was dismissed by the court once the defendants had withdrawn their proposal to issue a new class of non-voting stock. Lebovitch also acted as co-lead in a breach of fiduciary duty case against Intuitive Surgical in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which resulted in a $15m settlement. Jeroen van Kwawegen and David Wales are also recommended for securities- and M&A-related cases.

Trusted Advisor - with Finnegan

IP specialist Finnegan detail how their collaborative approach makes for a unique culture which is designed to allow them to work with clients in a way which is cognizant of the challenges facing all companies today.

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. has ‘great strength in litigation and is firmly focused on the client’s needs’. The firm has a leading practice for asset recovery and complex financial litigation, including securities- and M&A-related matters. In the last 10 years, the firm as recovered $28bn for its clients. Managing director and leading light Stuart Grant in the Wilmington office has a tremendous track record, which last year included making closing arguments in the Delaware Chancery Court case In re Appraisal of AOL, Inc, in which the firm represented AOL stockholders seeking the determination of fair value following the 2015 acquisition of Verizon for $50 per share. Grant, Michael Barry and Christine Mackintosh also advised stockholders in In re Appraisal of Solera Holdings, Inc, in a case before Chancellor Andre Bouchard in Delaware that sought fair value for shares after the company was taken private by affiliates of private equity firm Vista Equity Partners. Nathan Cook, whose cases included In re Appraisal of The Fresh Market, Inc and In re Appraisal of Diamond Resorts International, Inc is also recommended. Rising star Kimberley Evans is lead attorney in In re ExamWorks Group Inc Stockholder Appraisal Litigation, in which company shareholders challenged the $35.05 per share purchase price paid by private equity firm Leonard Green & Partners. The case is being prepared for trial in early 2018.

The team in Labaton Sucharow LLP’s Wilmington office has ‘a very selective approach to cases, which the court appreciates’. The firm has a 50-year history pursuing M&A, derivative and other shareholder actions, including claims for excessive compensation, improper interested party transactions, misuse of corporate assets and breaches of fiduciary duty, as well as challenges to deal valuations. Ned Weinberger leads the corporate governance and shareholder rights litigation practice and is ‘an aggressive young lawyer who is very bright and really knows the law’. He recently acted as co-lead counsel in a class and derivative action for Haverhill Retirement System that alleged improper financing arrangements by Providence Service Corporation in its 2014 acquisition of CCHN Group Holdings for $400m. The resulting $10m settlement is currently awaiting court approval. He is acting for Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and Boston Retirement System in a derivative class action challenging the decision of directors of Tesla Motors, Inc to acquire solar panel manufacturer SolarCity. The case alleges that the deal was a self-interested bailout of the struggling company. A further highlight is his work for shareholders of Straight Path Communications in a case alleging breaches of fiduciary duty by the controlling stockholder in the company’s proposed sale to Verizon Communications. Ira Schochet is also recommended.

Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLPdoes good due diligence and really knows its cases well’. It is recommended for developing ‘collaborative relationships with clients’. Lee Rudy leads the M&A litigation team from the Philadelphia office and is also joint chair of the firm’s qui tam and whistle-blower practices. Among his highlights in 2017 was his work in St Lucie County Fire Dist. Firefighters’ Pension Trust Fund v Rosebrough, et al, which focused on claims arising from the merger between Steris and Synergy Health. He secured additional disclosures that included updated estimates of the make-whole payments each individual defendant would receive as payment. He also played a central role in In re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, CA, which alleged that the board of Tesla breached its fiduciary duty to its stockholders by agreeing to acquire SolarCity for an excessively high price. He also acted for Arkansas Teacher Retirement System in a case arising from the acquisition of Alon USA Energy by its controlling stockholder, alleging that the structure and timing of the transaction was unfair on Alon’s public stockholders.

Robbins Arroyo LLP in San Diego ‘is a firm that makes defense lawyers take notice when it brings a case’. The firm regularly acts for individual and institutional shareholders in securities class actions and M&A-related disputes. The firm continues to pursue a class action lawsuit against Outerwall Inc for violations of sections 14(e) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and the SEC’s Rule 14a, alleging that misleading statements were made to gain shareholder approval of the company’s acquisition by Apollo Global Management. Felipe Arroyo, newly promoted Jenny Dixon, Stephen Oddo and Ashley Rifkin are the key names.

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLPis a firm that cannot be ignored on the plaintiff side; it has a big presence in the market’. The firm is known as one of the most active in filing M&A and securities litigation. Randall Baron has built an enviable track record in landmark cases such as In re Kinder Morgan, Inc S’holders Litig., in which he obtained a $200m common fund for former Kinder Morgan shareholders in what was the largest-ever M&A class action recovery in history; In re Dole Food Co, Inc Stockholder Litig., saw Baron and Rick Atwood try a breach of fiduciary case in the Delaware Court of Chancery against of Dole Food and secured the largest trial verdict in a class action challenging a merger transaction. David Knotts also has a stellar track record that includes a $30m award in In re Onyx S’holders Litig.

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Korean Financial Regulators Advance Legislation to Introduce Regulatory Sandbox to Spark FinTech

    The 2018 year in review in Korea was notable for the sluggish overall economy, uncertainty surrounding the geo-politics and impact on Korea due to the global trade wars, on-going concerns related to the lack of jobs and unemployment, increased taxes and burdens for businesses and families, and no meaningful improvement or clarity in the current situation for 2019. In response, the Korean National Assembly passed a legislation called the Financial Innovation Support Act (the “FinISA”) on December 7, 2018 to spark the financial services industry in conjunction with FinTech products and services. The FinISA, which will soon take effect in March 2019, is intended to lay the legal foundation to introduce a regulatory sandbox for innovative financial services, where FinTech firms test their new products and services without certain regulatory oversight pursuant to exemptions for a limited period of time (“Sandbox”). As the FinISA exempts or defers application of existing finance-related regulations for new financial technology, products or services with the purpose of fostering the creation of innovative and new financial products and services, it will also support the stabilization of such services in the financial services market at the end of the testing period and is expected that the FinISA will support a revitalization of the FinTech industry which experienced sluggish growth in recent times. In particular, as companies and investors become more interested in security tokens and Security Token Offerings (“STO”) which are regulated by the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (the “FSCMA”), there have been on-going discussions and debates as to whether the FinISA could lead to a breakthrough in the crypto-asset industry based on blockchain technology. Crypto assets encompasses those assets which utilize blockchain technology where the asset is digitalized by utilization of cryptography, peer-to-peer networks and a public ledger of verified transactions resulting in a ‘units’ of such a crypto asset without any involvement by middle-persons or brokers (e.g., cryptocurrency.

    The sacking of Nissan’s high-profile chairman may have beenproof that nobody is infallible. But Nicola Sharp argues that it should also beseen as an indicator that no company can be considered safe from wrongdoing.
  • 2018 FCPA Enforcement Actions and Highlights

    Overall, 2018 was a more active year in terms of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") enforcement actions compared to 2017.
  • Legality of advertising with statements on the effects of medical treatments

    Advertisements featuring statements on the effects of medical treatments are only permissible if they are supported by sound scientific evidence. This was reaffirmed by the Oberlandesgericht (OLG) Frankfurt, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt.
  • Sayenko Kharenko announces new partner promotion

    Sayenko Kharenko announces new partner promotion
  • ECJ – Distinctive character necessary for registration as EU trade mark

    For a sign to be capable of being registered as an EU trade mark, it must be distinctive across the entire European Union. This was confirmed by the Court of Justice of European Union (ECJ) in a ruling from 25 July 2018.
  • Supporting local and international charitable organizations

    As one of the leading law firms in Cyprus, we are active promoters and supporters of local economic growth by sponsoring local events, applying environmental-friendly practices, minimizing our ecological impact, and most importantly, by raising money for local charities and non-profit organizations.
  • BAG – Employers can claw back bonus payments

    The Bundesarbeitsgericht (BAG), Germany’s Federal Labour Court, confirmed in a recent ruling that employers can claw back collectively agreed bonus payments from employees under certain circumstances.
  • Stricter supervision in relation to the Scheme for Naturalisation of Investors in Cyprus by Exceptio

    Recently there were a lot of publications within the European Union expressing concerns about the allegedly very high number of Cypriot passports being given to foreign investors the last few years. The Council of Ministers has decided on 9th January 2018 with the decision with number 84.069, to impose a stricter supervision of all the parties involved in the Scheme for the naturalisation of non-Cypriot investors in Cyprus by exception.
  • 19% VAT on Plots

    In order to harmonize the  Acquis Communautaire on the Taxation of untapped and undeveloped plots of land, the Cyprus Government enacted, on 03/11/2017, relevant legislation for the imposition of 19% Value Added Tax (VAT) on these properties, with a date of enforcement being 02/01/2018. The relevant legislation refers to plots/pieces of land offered and/or provided for construction for economic purposes.

Press Releases worldwide

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to