Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon


The Legal 500 Hall of Fame Icon The Legal 500 Hall of Fame highlights individuals who have received constant praise by their clients for continued excellence. The Hall of Fame highlights, to clients, the law firm partners who are at the pinnacle of the profession. In Europe, Middle East and Africa, the criteria for entry is to have been recognised by The Legal 500 as one of the elite leading lawyers for seven consecutive years. These partners are highlighted below and throughout the editorial.
Click here for more details

Norway > Legal Developments > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings


Patent litigation: Esomeprazol infringement case

In a judgement of 12 April 2012 Oslo District Court ruled that Krka’s marketing of Esomeprazol Krka infringed AstraZeneca’s patent NO 307308.

The patent has earlier been the subject-matter of an invalidity case, where Sandoz challenged the patent. Oslo District Court found the patent to be invalid, except patent claim 10, which were the claim relied on in the infringement case. However, the Court of Appeal stated that the whole patent was valid, and the Appeals Selection Committee of the Supreme Court denied admittance of the case.

In the infringement case, the main question was whether Krka’s esomeprazol, which contained esomeprazol in an enantiomeric excess (e.e.) of between 98,74 and 99,5%, was in accordance with the wording “optically pure”.  Krka’s statement was that “optically pure” meant 99.8% e.e. or more, which would bring Esomeprazol Krka outside what was stated in the patent claim. One of the arguments used by Krka was that the European sister patent of NO 307308 had been amended so that the given borderline were stated in the patent claim instead of “optically pure”. However, the court found the limit in the European sister patent not to be relevant to the case.

According to the judgement, Krka will have to pay NOK 14 600 000 (appr. € 1 950 000) in compensation plus NOK 1 500 000 (appr. € 200 000) in litigation costs to Astra Zeneca.

The judgement from Oslo District Court has been appealed by Krka.

Areas of practice: Patent, Trademark and Design law
For more information please visit



Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International Law Firm Networks

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

GC Powerlist -

International Law Firm Networks