Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

United Kingdom > London Bar > IT and telecoms > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings

Editorial

Other

Index of tables

  1. IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - Leading Sets
  2. Telecoms (Regulatory) - Leading Sets
  3. IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - Leading Silks
  4. Leading Silks
  5. Telecoms (Regulatory) - Leading Silks
  6. IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - 2018 Silks
  7. IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - 2019 Silks
  8. Telecoms (Regulatory) - 2019 Silks
  9. IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - Leading Juniors
  10. Telecoms (Regulatory) - Leading Juniors

IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - Leading Silks

  1. 1
    • Daniel Alexander QC - 8 New SquareHe is great for getting an overall sense of how a case would run and how a court would respond.
    • Guy Burkill QC - Three New SquareHe is technically brilliant and very good with clients.
    • Alex Charlton QC - 4 PUMP COURTHe is a leader in this field and an extremely knowledgeable and tactically astute barrister.
    • Michael Silverleaf QC - 11 South SquareHe provides exceptionally clear advice and puts across a strong argument in court.
  2. 2
  3. 3
    • Paul Lowenstein QC - 20 Essex StreetHe is known for his experience in a range of telecoms contracts and IT disputes.
    • Graham Read QC - DevereuxA true heavyweight of the telecoms Bar.
    • Adrian Speck QC - 8 New SquareHe is particularly strong for FRAND licensing disputes relating to standards essential telecommunications patents.
    • Mark Vanhegan QC - 11 South SquareHe inspires confidence with his mastery of the legal and technical issues.
  4. 4

Leading Silks

  1. 1
    • Josh Holmes QC - Monckton ChambersAn excellent leader in regulatory appeals, he is clear, calm, and forensic in his submissions and cross-examination, and is very user-friendly. His understanding of telecoms law is second to none.

Telecoms (Regulatory) - Leading Silks

  1. 1

IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - 2018 Silks

  1. 1

IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - 2019 Silks

  1. 1
    • Brian Nicholson QC - 11 South SquareWith an impressive understanding of the technicalities of a case, he is a safe pair of hands.

Telecoms (Regulatory) - 2019 Silks

  1. 1

IT and telecoms (excluding regulatory) - Leading Juniors

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Telecoms (Regulatory) - Leading Juniors

  1. 1

The ‘excellent11 South Square ‘have a very strong field of IP QCs’ with experience across the IT and telecoms sector. Michael Silverleaf QC was instructed by Semtech in their dispute with Hilight Semiconductor regarding a patent for a computer chip, while Mark Vanhegan QC acted for Philips in three Patents Court trials regarding allegations of infringement of three standard essential patents against ASUS and HTC. Other barristers of note include Brian Nicholson QC, who took silk in 2019.

4 PUMP COURT ‘combines IP and tech expertise’ with experience in a broad range of IT and telecoms disputes including those relating to licensing, royalties, outsourcing, infrastructure and cybersecurity. The set’s ’fantastic juniors are the cream of the crop’ and are complemented by ‘impressive silks’. In a recent high profile instruction Alex Charlton QC and Matthew Lavy are representing British Airways in a £70m dispute against CBRE Ltd, whose alleged breach of contract and negligence damaged and brought down its IT systems in May 2017 forcing the cancellation of many flights.

8 New Square, which has been highlighted as ‘one of the best sets in the IP world’, is also considered ‘at the top of its game in IT’. The ‘excellent set’ has expertise in contractual disputes, as well as on those relating to domain names, and data rights and protection. High-profile instructions include Conversant Wireless Licensing Sarl v Huawei Technology Co Ltd, in which Jaani Riordan is instructed for Huawei and Adrian Speck QC for Conversant, and Argos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc, which includes Jonathan Hill for the claimant and Jaani Riordan for the defendant.

Atkin Chambers is a set to note for IT infrastructure disputes, within which its barristers have acted both for and against software providers. In a recent work example, James Howells QC is representing PTT Limited in a dispute with Triple Point Technology Inc relating to $13m claims and counterclaims arising out of the termination of a contract for the design and implementation of IT systems across Asia and Gulf businesses.

Blackstone Chambers is considered to be ‘the strongest public law set’ and ‘one of the leading sets for telecoms regulatory matters in acting for both Ofcom and telecoms companies’. Recent highlights include James Segan's representation of a telecoms company in challenging a direction by Ofcom, requiring it to refrain from liberalising the regulatory regime for GSM gateways, and Tom Richards' instruction by Telefónica in an appeal against a determination by Ofcom concerning ‘flip-flopping’ of termination rates by H3G and Vodafone. Pushpinder Saini QC (recently appointed to the High Court) was instructed by Ofcom in a judicial review challenge to its Annual Licence Fees, brought by EE, Vodafone.

Monckton Chambers ‘has an impressive strength for contentious telecoms regulatory work’ with ’a deep knowledge of the regulatory framework and its technical aspects’. The set is frequently instructed in regulatory challenges; Meredith Pickford QC represented by TalkTalk and Sky in the Court of Appeal in an appeal against Ofcom relating to charges for Ethernet services while Michael Bowsher QC and Fiona Banks  was instructed by Viasat UK Limited and Viasat, Inc in an appeal against Ofcom’s authorisation to the intervener Inmarsat Ventures Ltd for the use of the 2GHz spectrum by ground stations for the operation of a satellite mobile communications network, pursuant to the Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006.

Attracting praise for delivering ‘concise, easy to understand and sensible advice’, the ‘excellent team’ at Devereux has been highlighted by clients as the ‘first choice for work relating to the new Telecoms Code’. In a recent work highlight, Graham Read QC was instructed by EE Limited and Hutchinson 3G Limited in a dispute against The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Islington for the rights, under the New Electronic Communication Code, to erect a replacement mast following redevelopment at a former mast site.

The ‘well-regardedThree New Square  has ‘an exceptional level of knowledge’ and ‘a great strength in patent litigation’ including in the electronics industry. In recent case highlights, Thomas Hinchliffe QC is representing Asus and HTC in an action relating to FRAND licensing of 4G wireless technology against HTC; Joe Delaney is instructed by TQ Delta in a telecoms dispute with ZyXEL, concerning the implementation of standards essential patents, and Miles Copeland is acting for Huawei and ZTE in high-profile FRAND litigation brought by Conversant Wireless Licensing.

GC Diversity and Inclusion Report

In partnership with...

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

Press Releases in the UK

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to