The Legal 500

AMPERSAND, ADVOCATES LIBRARY, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, EDINBURGH, EH1 1RF, SCOTLAND
Tel:
Work 0131 260 5674
Fax:
Fax 0131 225 3642
Web:
www.ampersandstable.com
Email:

Aidan O’Neill QC

Tel:
Work 0131 226 5071
Email:
Ampersand ()

Position

Aidan O’Neill is qualified to appear as counsel in Scotland, as well as in the courts of England and Wales. He practises in both jurisdictions, and has a civil/commercial practice involving a significant element of advice and court appearances on issues of European Union law and domestic constitutional law, particularly as engaged in public law, human rights and employment and discrimination law. He has appeared as senior counsel before the European Court of Human Rights, Court of Justice of the European Union, the UK Supreme Court, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, and the House of Lords. Notable EU fundamental rights cases include: McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC, [2012] CSIH 67; 2011 SLT 633, OH (on EU law and prisoners’ voting rights); Scotch Whisky Association and others v Scottish Ministers [2013] CSOH nyr (on minimum alcohol pricing); Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44. Notable civil liberties cases include: Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom [2013] ECHR (Grand Chamber); Greens v United Kingdom [2010] ECtHR 60041/08 (fourth section, 23 November 2010); Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] 1 WLR 2601 [2010] UKSC 43; R (JF and Thompson) v Minister of Justice [2010] 2 WLR 992, UKSC. Notable constitutional law cases include: AXA General insurance v Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46; Somerville v Scottish Ministers 2008 SC (HL) 45; Davidson v Scottish Ministers (No 1) [2005] UKHL 74; Davidson v Scottish Ministers (No 2) [2004] UKHL 34; Millar v Dickson [2002]1 WLR 1615, JCPC; and Lord Advocate’s reference (No1 of 2000) re nuclear weapons 2001 JC 143, HCJ. Recent public law cases include R (Sandiford) v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2013] EWHC 168 (Adrnin) (whether the FCO had duties under the ECHR and EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to provide funding for legal representation of British nationals facing death penalty abroad); Caim Energy plc v Greenpeace lntemational [2013] CSOH nyr (on rights of protest); NJ and EH v Lord Advocate and others [2013] CSOH 27 (on the convention rights of mothers to participate and be legally represented in court hearings for emergency child protection orders); McGeoch v Scottish Legal Aid Board [2013] CSOH 6 (duties of the legal aid board under to grant legal aid to allow vindication of an effective remedy in national court for claims relating to breach of substantive EU law rights); Khakh v Independent Safeguarding Authority [2012] UKUT 424 (AAC) (scope of the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal in appeals against decision of the Independent Safeguarding Authority not to remove an individual automatically placed on barred lists after conviction of a relevant offence); Biggins v Criminal lnjuries Compensation Authonly [2012] UKUT 286; Ferrie v CICA [2012] UKUT 287 (private international law and scope of the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal in judicial reviews decision of the Criminal injuries Compensation Authority); M v Scottish Legal Aid Board [2012] SL T 354, OH (on the interplay and distinction between ‘advice and assistance’ and ‘ABWOR – assistance by way of representation’); R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] 1 AC 633, UKSC and Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [2012] 1 AC 710, [2012] SC (UKSC) 1 (on tile susceptibility of decisions of tile Upper Tribunal to judicial review in Scotland and England and Wales); N v City of Edinburgh Council [2011] SC 513, IH (re the Additional Support Needs Tribunal for Scotland and the refusal by the local authority of a placing request made in respect of a severely autistic child); SK v Paterson [2010] SC 186 IH (on the Convention compatibility of the failure of the Scottish Ministers to make provision for legal aid before Children’s Hearing in respect of adult ‘relevant persons’); Global Santa Fe Drilling Co (North Sea) Ltd v Lord Advocate [2009] SC 575 IH, [2007] SLT 849 OH (on the competency of tile Sheriff making an award of expenses against the Crown in a Fatal Accident Inquiry). Significant cases in employment/discrimination law include: Ravat v Haliburton Manufacturing & Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 1, [2010] 1 RLP 1053 IH; University College Union v University of Stirling [2013] CSIH nyr; Cusick v Strathclyde Joint Police Board [2012] CSIH nyr; Russell and ors v Transocean plc (No 2) [2011] IRLR 24 IH; Archibald v Fife Council [2004] UKHL 32, [2004] 4 All ER 303 and MacDonald v Ministry of Defence [2003] UKHL 32, [2004] 1 all ER 339. He also practises at Matrix Chambers.

Career

Called 1987 (Scotland); called England and Wales Inner Temple 1996; Q.C. Scotland 1999; Standing Junior Counsel to the Scottish Office 1997-99; publications: ‘EU Law for UK Lawyers; the domestic impact of EU law within the UK’ (Hart 2nd ed 2011); ‘Judicial Review in Scotland: a practitioner’s guide’ (Butterworths 1999); ‘Decisions of the European Court of Justice and their Constitutional Implications’ (Butterworths 1994); contributing editor (Scotland) for Clayton & Tomlinson ‘Law of Human Rights’ (2nd ed 2009); contributor to a number of legal books and author of a number of articles in scholarly journals, particularly in the field of human rights and community/EU law.

Languages

French, Italian.

Education

University of Edinburgh (LLB (Hons) first class; Diploma in legal practice); University of Sydney (LLM (Hons) first class); European University Institute, Florence (LLM); University of Edinburgh (LLD (awarded on the basis of legal publications).

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • SQUEEZE-OUT RIGHT IN PUBLIC COMPANIES -- TURKEY

    Squeeze-out and sell-out rights in Turkish public companies are regulated by the Communiqué on Squeeze-Out and Sell-Out Rights (the " Communiqué ") published in the Official Gazette dated 2 January 2014 effective as of 1 July 2014. The Communiqué was issued by the Capital Markets Board of Turkey (the " CMB ") in accordance with the Capital Markets Law and regulates the right to squeeze-out minority shareholders by the controlling shareholder and the minority shareholders' rights to exit the public company by selling their shares to the majority shareholder.
    - Paksoy
  • Financial Services and Regulatory Summer Update 2014

    The aim of this Update is to focus on current legal and regulatory developments affecting financial services institutions in Jersey and to provide some brief thoughts on the implications of these developments for your business. In this Update, we look at current consultations on civil penalties and changes to the Money Laundering Order. Our Spotlight article considers changes to the tipping-off rules which are coming into effect shortly.   Read more...
  • Integration of US and Europe Energy Markets: TTIP and Global Energy Trading Projection

    Shale gas revolution has been driving US energy market by increasing economic and industrial competitiveness. Today, shale gas has gained acceptance as "bonanza" which triggered slump in gas prices and sparked off widening the energy gap between US and Europe. US gas export is forecasted to bemounted up 6 billion cubic feet per day signifying UK's daily demand in winter as of 2020. At this stage, a potential oil and gas trade between US and EU will become an inevitable pace for world energy supply-demand balance.
  • Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: How should Turkey Cope with the Changing Dynamics?

    The free trade agreement, known with its acronym TTIP , currently being negotiated between the United States and the European Union is expected to have immense legal implications as well as commercial ones for the signatories. The numbers are self explanatory; two blocks when combined together produces almost half the world's GDP and around one third of the total world trade. The bilateral trade across the Atlantic has already exceeded USD 3.7 trillion. For these two economic giants to sign such a deal mean a monumental shift in world economic balances. As the United States and the European Union are expected to benefit significantly from such shift, the countries that will be left out will have to face a new legal regime that would cover the entire jurisdiction producing half of the world's GDP.
  • Bright Future Of Solar Power Market In Turkey

    In recent years renewable energy market development became primary energy strategy of Turkish government with the intention of improving energy efficiency and decreasing energy import dependency. Particularly, solar power seems as fundamental resource  of electricity generation in the near future. In terms of insolation Turkey possesses high potential among European countries.
  • LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION

    Certain important and recent case laws in this area are set out below.
  • PROJECTS, ENERGY & NATURAL RESOURCES

    Certain important legal developments in this area are set out below.
  • Real Estate/ Property

    Certain important and recent case laws in this area are set out below.
  • TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA & BROADCASTING TELECOMMUNICATIONS

    Certain important legal developments in this area are set out below.
  • Trade Laws and WTO Matters

    The recent developments pertaining to anti-dumping duties are as follows: