The Legal 500

AMPERSAND, ADVOCATES LIBRARY, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, EDINBURGH, EH1 1RF, SCOTLAND
Tel:
Work 0131 260 5674
Fax:
Fax 0131 225 3642
Email:
Web:
www.ampersandstable.com

Aidan O’neill QC

Tel:
Work 0131 226 5071
Email:
Ampersand ()

Position

Aidan O’Neill is qualified to appear as counsel in Scotland, as well as in the courts of England and Wales. He practises in both jurisdictions, and has a civil/commercial practice involving a significant element of advice and court appearances on issues of European Union law and domestic constitutional law, particularly as engaged in public law, human rights and employment and discrimination law. He has appeared as senior counsel before the European Court of Human Rights, Court of Justice of the European Union, the UK Supreme Court, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, and the House of Lords. Notable EU fundamental rights cases include: McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC, [2012] CSIH 67; 2011 SLT 633, OH (on EU law and prisoners’ voting rights); Scotch Whisky Association and others v Scottish Ministers [2013] CSOH nyr (on minimum alcohol pricing); Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44. Notable civil liberties cases include: Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom [2013] ECHR (Grand Chamber); Greens v United Kingdom [2010] ECtHR 60041/08 (fourth section, 23 November 2010); Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] 1 WLR 2601 [2010] UKSC 43; R (JF and Thompson) v Minister of Justice [2010] 2 WLR 992, UKSC. Notable constitutional law cases include: AXA General insurance v Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46; Somerville v Scottish Ministers 2008 SC (HL) 45; Davidson v Scottish Ministers (No 1) [2005] UKHL 74; Davidson v Scottish Ministers (No 2) [2004] UKHL 34; Millar v Dickson [2002]1 WLR 1615, JCPC; and Lord Advocate’s reference (No1 of 2000) re nuclear weapons 2001 JC 143, HCJ. Recent public law cases include R (Sandiford) v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2013] EWHC 168 (Adrnin) (whether the FCO had duties under the ECHR and EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to provide funding for legal representation of British nationals facing death penalty abroad); Caim Energy plc v Greenpeace lntemational [2013] CSOH nyr (on rights of protest); NJ and EH v Lord Advocate and others [2013] CSOH 27 (on the convention rights of mothers to participate and be legally represented in court hearings for emergency child protection orders); McGeoch v Scottish Legal Aid Board [2013] CSOH 6 (duties of the legal aid board under to grant legal aid to allow vindication of an effective remedy in national court for claims relating to breach of substantive EU law rights); Khakh v Independent Safeguarding Authority [2012] UKUT 424 (AAC) (scope of the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal in appeals against decision of the Independent Safeguarding Authority not to remove an individual automatically placed on barred lists after conviction of a relevant offence); Biggins v Criminal lnjuries Compensation Authonly [2012] UKUT 286; Ferrie v CICA [2012] UKUT 287 (private international law and scope of the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal in judicial reviews decision of the Criminal injuries Compensation Authority); M v Scottish Legal Aid Board [2012] SL T 354, OH (on the interplay and distinction between ‘advice and assistance’ and ‘ABWOR – assistance by way of representation’); R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] 1 AC 633, UKSC and Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [2012] 1 AC 710, [2012] SC (UKSC) 1 (on tile susceptibility of decisions of tile Upper Tribunal to judicial review in Scotland and England and Wales); N v City of Edinburgh Council [2011] SC 513, IH (re the Additional Support Needs Tribunal for Scotland and the refusal by the local authority of a placing request made in respect of a severely autistic child); SK v Paterson [2010] SC 186 IH (on the Convention compatibility of the failure of the Scottish Ministers to make provision for legal aid before Children’s Hearing in respect of adult ‘relevant persons’); Global Santa Fe Drilling Co (North Sea) Ltd v Lord Advocate [2009] SC 575 IH, [2007] SLT 849 OH (on the competency of tile Sheriff making an award of expenses against the Crown in a Fatal Accident Inquiry). Significant cases in employment/discrimination law include: Ravat v Haliburton Manufacturing & Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 1, [2010] 1 RLP 1053 IH; University College Union v University of Stirling [2013] CSIH nyr; Cusick v Strathclyde Joint Police Board [2012] CSIH nyr; Russell and ors v Transocean plc (No 2) [2011] IRLR 24 IH; Archibald v Fife Council [2004] UKHL 32, [2004] 4 All ER 303 and MacDonald v Ministry of Defence [2003] UKHL 32, [2004] 1 all ER 339. He also practises at Matrix Chambers.

Career

Called 1987 (Scotland); called England and Wales Inner Temple 1996; Q.C. Scotland 1999; Standing Junior Counsel to the Scottish Office 1997-99; publications: ‘EU Law for UK Lawyers; the domestic impact of EU law within the UK’ (Hart 2nd ed 2011); ‘Judicial Review in Scotland: a practitioner’s guide’ (Butterworths 1999); ‘Decisions of the European Court of Justice and their Constitutional Implications’ (Butterworths 1994); contributing editor (Scotland) for Clayton & Tomlinson ‘Law of Human Rights’ (2nd ed 2009); contributor to a number of legal books and author of a number of articles in scholarly journals, particularly in the field of human rights and community/EU law.

Languages

French, Italian.

Education

University of Edinburgh (LLB (Hons) first class; Diploma in legal practice); University of Sydney (LLM (Hons) first class); European University Institute, Florence (LLM); University of Edinburgh (LLD (awarded on the basis of legal publications).

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Recent Issues of Data Protection Regulation in Korea

    The Personal Information Protection Act ("PIPA") was enacted as a general law of personal information in March 2011 to fulfill the need for presiding rules to govern personal information protection. In fact, there have already been a number of special laws governing personal information protection in various special areas and cases, such as The Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization Information Protection ("Network Act") governing information and communications services, and the Use and Protection of Credit Information Act ("Credit Information Act") governing personal credit information. Special laws prevail over the general law, when in conflict with individual articles of the general law.
  • Work Permits for Foreign Shareholders and Managers in Turkey

    Since last 10 years the financial developments and the promising financial and technological progresses notably in energy, tourism and infrastructure sectors have attracted the foreign investors' interest. Since the number of foreign investments has been increasing within these developments, the question, if a company may have foreign shareholders and foreign board members has come to the fore. This was actually the result of the frequent change in laws as part of adaptation progress to E.U legislation. 
  • Concerns regarding UCA as a result of coalition agreement Michel I

     
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN DEFENSE INDUSTRY: BEYOND THE INTANGIBILITY IN TURKEY

    The intellectual property rights (IP) are conceptually is linked to both intellectual and industrial rights in Turkish legislation. Intellectual property rights are almost related to the intellectual and artistic works, linked rights (neighboring rights), computer programs and databases and protected with royalty, while industrial rights contain patents, utility models, trademarks, industrial designs, topographies of integrated circuits (chips), geographical indications, plant varieties, other names and signs, trade secrets (know-how, undisclosed information) and they are protected with industrial and exclusive rights.
  • An Overview of FIDIC Rules

    FIDIC, (Federation Internationale Des Ingenieurs Conseils), International Federation of Consulting Engineers aims to find a resolution in construction sector. There are five different FIDIC contracts in different colors that regulates different and separate obligations and rights. Today FIDIC is applied to 30 % of international construction project contracts. In Turkey, FIDIC mostly was preferred in high volume construction projects such as Marmaray Bosphorus Project, Baku Ceyhan Pipeline Construction Project, Ankara- Istanbul Highway Construction. 
  • Delivery of Leviathan Gas through Turkey

    Israel's offshore Tamar and Leviathan gas fields in Eastern Mediterranean Sea have a significant discovery in order to meet Europe's rising gas and energy need.
  • Present and Future of Renewable Energy Resources Support Mechanism in Turkey: “YEKDEM”

    Turkish Energy Market Regulatory Authority ("EMRA") has announced on 1st October 2014 that the electricity manufacturing license holders producing electricity from renewable resources are required to submit their applications for Renewable Energy Resources Support Mechanism ("YEKDEM") for the year 2015 until 31th October 2014, in order to benefit from the facilities regulated by the related legislation.
  • Re-employment of Employees & Constructive Dismissal Claims

    This update reports recent developments on employment law and practice in Singapore.
  • Comprehensive Measures to Protect Personal Data in the Financial Sector

    The following is a summary of the press releases made by the Financial Services Commission on 10 March 2014. These are action items and policies that the FSC and relevant ministries are seeking to implement. The following measures have developed from a series of measures previously announced since the data leakage from the three credit card companies were revealed last January.
  • Essilor’s Proposed Combination with an Optical Lens Maker in Korea is Blocked

    In its press release on March 17, 2014, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (the "KFTC") blocked the proposed acquisition of 50% shares by Essilor Amera Investment Pte. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Essilor International S.A., the largest optical lens maker in the world) in Daemyung Optical Co., Ltd. (the second largest optical lens maker in Korea) citing inter alia the likely lessening effect on price competition and the probable future abuses of the enhanced market power. On top of the expressed competitive concerns, the KFTC observed that allowing foreign firms to acquire local firms and turn them into their local sub-contractors worsens the competitive market structure of the domestic optical lens industry.