The Legal 500

AMPERSAND, ADVOCATES LIBRARY, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, EDINBURGH, EH1 1RF, SCOTLAND
Tel:
Work 0131 260 5674
Fax:
Fax 0131 225 3642
Email:
Web:
www.ampersandstable.com

Aidan O’neill QC

Tel:
Work 0131 226 5071
Email:
Ampersand ()

Position

Aidan O’Neill is qualified to appear as counsel in Scotland, as well as in the courts of England and Wales. He practises in both jurisdictions, and has a civil/commercial practice involving a significant element of advice and court appearances on issues of European Union law and domestic constitutional law, particularly as engaged in public law, human rights and employment and discrimination law. He has appeared as senior counsel before the European Court of Human Rights, Court of Justice of the European Union, the UK Supreme Court, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, and the House of Lords. Notable EU fundamental rights cases include: McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC, [2012] CSIH 67; 2011 SLT 633, OH (on EU law and prisoners’ voting rights); Scotch Whisky Association and others v Scottish Ministers [2013] CSOH nyr (on minimum alcohol pricing); Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44. Notable civil liberties cases include: Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom [2013] ECHR (Grand Chamber); Greens v United Kingdom [2010] ECtHR 60041/08 (fourth section, 23 November 2010); Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] 1 WLR 2601 [2010] UKSC 43; R (JF and Thompson) v Minister of Justice [2010] 2 WLR 992, UKSC. Notable constitutional law cases include: AXA General insurance v Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46; Somerville v Scottish Ministers 2008 SC (HL) 45; Davidson v Scottish Ministers (No 1) [2005] UKHL 74; Davidson v Scottish Ministers (No 2) [2004] UKHL 34; Millar v Dickson [2002]1 WLR 1615, JCPC; and Lord Advocate’s reference (No1 of 2000) re nuclear weapons 2001 JC 143, HCJ. Recent public law cases include R (Sandiford) v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2013] EWHC 168 (Adrnin) (whether the FCO had duties under the ECHR and EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to provide funding for legal representation of British nationals facing death penalty abroad); Caim Energy plc v Greenpeace lntemational [2013] CSOH nyr (on rights of protest); NJ and EH v Lord Advocate and others [2013] CSOH 27 (on the convention rights of mothers to participate and be legally represented in court hearings for emergency child protection orders); McGeoch v Scottish Legal Aid Board [2013] CSOH 6 (duties of the legal aid board under to grant legal aid to allow vindication of an effective remedy in national court for claims relating to breach of substantive EU law rights); Khakh v Independent Safeguarding Authority [2012] UKUT 424 (AAC) (scope of the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal in appeals against decision of the Independent Safeguarding Authority not to remove an individual automatically placed on barred lists after conviction of a relevant offence); Biggins v Criminal lnjuries Compensation Authonly [2012] UKUT 286; Ferrie v CICA [2012] UKUT 287 (private international law and scope of the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal in judicial reviews decision of the Criminal injuries Compensation Authority); M v Scottish Legal Aid Board [2012] SL T 354, OH (on the interplay and distinction between ‘advice and assistance’ and ‘ABWOR – assistance by way of representation’); R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] 1 AC 633, UKSC and Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [2012] 1 AC 710, [2012] SC (UKSC) 1 (on tile susceptibility of decisions of tile Upper Tribunal to judicial review in Scotland and England and Wales); N v City of Edinburgh Council [2011] SC 513, IH (re the Additional Support Needs Tribunal for Scotland and the refusal by the local authority of a placing request made in respect of a severely autistic child); SK v Paterson [2010] SC 186 IH (on the Convention compatibility of the failure of the Scottish Ministers to make provision for legal aid before Children’s Hearing in respect of adult ‘relevant persons’); Global Santa Fe Drilling Co (North Sea) Ltd v Lord Advocate [2009] SC 575 IH, [2007] SLT 849 OH (on the competency of tile Sheriff making an award of expenses against the Crown in a Fatal Accident Inquiry). Significant cases in employment/discrimination law include: Ravat v Haliburton Manufacturing & Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 1, [2010] 1 RLP 1053 IH; University College Union v University of Stirling [2013] CSIH nyr; Cusick v Strathclyde Joint Police Board [2012] CSIH nyr; Russell and ors v Transocean plc (No 2) [2011] IRLR 24 IH; Archibald v Fife Council [2004] UKHL 32, [2004] 4 All ER 303 and MacDonald v Ministry of Defence [2003] UKHL 32, [2004] 1 all ER 339. He also practises at Matrix Chambers.

Career

Called 1987 (Scotland); called England and Wales Inner Temple 1996; Q.C. Scotland 1999; Standing Junior Counsel to the Scottish Office 1997-99; publications: ‘EU Law for UK Lawyers; the domestic impact of EU law within the UK’ (Hart 2nd ed 2011); ‘Judicial Review in Scotland: a practitioner’s guide’ (Butterworths 1999); ‘Decisions of the European Court of Justice and their Constitutional Implications’ (Butterworths 1994); contributing editor (Scotland) for Clayton & Tomlinson ‘Law of Human Rights’ (2nd ed 2009); contributor to a number of legal books and author of a number of articles in scholarly journals, particularly in the field of human rights and community/EU law.

Languages

French, Italian.

Education

University of Edinburgh (LLB (Hons) first class; Diploma in legal practice); University of Sydney (LLM (Hons) first class); European University Institute, Florence (LLM); University of Edinburgh (LLD (awarded on the basis of legal publications).

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • PL: Crime of active corruption and commercial bribery

    A conviction for the crimes of active corruption and commercial bribery, which are defined in art. 229 and 296a of the Polish Criminal Code (CC), not only brings about consequences on the grounds of criminal law, but also implies negative consequences in other spheres of law. One of these involves administrative law, more precisely public procurement law, which provides that company officers convicted for the above-mentioned crimes are to be excluded from public contract award procedures.  read more...
  • Drew & Napier acted for CapitaLand Limited on its joint venture with a subsidiary of Credo Group to

    Drew & Napier acted for CapitaLand Limited (" CapitaLand ") on its joint venture with a subsidiary of Credo Group (" CG ") to develop an integrated development in Central Jakarta, Indonesia. CapitaLand and CG will each hold a 50% stake in the joint venture.
  • ESMA consults on depositary requirements under UCITS V

    The European Securities and Markets Authority has issued a consultation paper seeking feedback from asset management industry members on its draft advice to the European Commission regarding depositary requirements under the forthcoming UCITS V directive. The paper has been drawn up in response to a provisional request from the Commission on July 3 seeking technical advice on the content of two delegated acts on depositaries that the Commission is called on to issue to complement the primary UCITS V legislative text.
  • Tax Update - October 2014

    Our quarterly tax update is dedicated to the main changes which have occurred over the last 3 months with regard to Luxembourg and international tax law. 2014.10.30_taxupdate
  • Taxation, Import, Export and Transfers under Turkish Petroleum Law

    The Turkish Petroleum Law, a touchstone for goals of attracting foreign investors to Turkish petroleum industry entered into force on 11 June 2013 and has been introduced as a revolution in oil and gas industry as it was leveling the playing field for foreign investors and removing the privileged rights of the state company. 
  • SLOT Applications in EU and Turkey

    In consideration of the duties and responsibilities of each two above mentioned authorities, the SLOTs regulations have been mentioned on laws and directives drafted by the DGCA until 17 June 2010. After 17 June 2010, the legal authority for SLOT application was transferred to GDSAA by the Ministry of Transport (restructured and named as Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication as of 01 November 2011).However, in current situation, the legal responsibility for SLOT applications is at the DGCA but the legal power is still exercised by GDSAA.
  • Work Permits under Wet Lease Agreements for Oil Exploration Operations: Secondment is a Solution for

    As part of exploration operations of multinational companies, wet lease agreements are gaining more importance especially in oil and gas industry and foreign carriers who takes part in such operations are still not clear about either their employees require work permit or not, in cases where they entered into a subcontractor and wet lease agreement with Turkish air carriers for air transport works to be conducted under exploration operations. The questions mostly concentrate on classification in status of flying and non flying personnel and the flying field since the operations are offshore. In this article you will find out more specific about what Turkish law requires and how to interpret the law under those two spotlights.
  • SLOT Applications At Turkish Civil Aviation

    Principally, the Turkish civil aviation legislation is prepared by two authorities in Turkey: Directorate General of Civil ("DGCA") and the General Directorate of State Airports Authority ("GDSAA"). DGCA regulates and ensures the development of the civil aviation activities therefore GDSAA performs the management of Turkish airports and controls the Turkish airspace as a state owned enterprise since 1984
  • Amendments to the Companies Act – Power of directors to bind companies

    29 Oct 2014
  • New Guidelines and Proposed Regulations for the Healthcare Sector

    This article discusses some of the recent developments in the healthcare regulatory landscape in Singapore.