The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of William McCormick QC

Work 020 7400 9600
Fax 020 7400 9630

William Mccormick QC

Work 020 7400 9603
Ely Place Chambers (Chambers of William McCormick QC)


Commercial work covers a broad range. Disputes arising out of the ownership or sale of business in recent years have included: a successful appeal to the Privy Council from the Court of Appeal of the Bahamas in relation to the sale of a fund management business; successfully resisting a claim to a share in a multi-million pound business based upon equitable estoppel/constructive trust principles and then a quantum meruit on the same basis; successfully resisting a claim for unfair prejudice relief and the setting aside of a share transaction in a 3 week hearing and in the Court of Appeal; obtained an account from a defaulting director who diverted corporate opportunities to a new company bought by her after she had been dismissed for attempting a similar diversion; resisted claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty by the vendor of a company; representing a client sued on the basis that her account had been the conduit for some of the c£6m which her husband and others had allegedly stolen from businesses. He advised the CEO of Bernard Madoff’s London operation when the liquidator commenced (ultimately unsuccessful) litigation against him. Other commercial cases include defending a claim for the return of monies paid under an alleged insider trading agreement (due before the Supreme Court in Feb 2016) and defending a former FD accused of perpetrating a £50m fraud on her employer’s bank. He has appeared in cases in Trinidad (at all levels up to the Privy Council) and the DIFC (CA) as well as advising on the conduct of winding up proceedings in the Bahamas. Regularly involved in disputes arising out of banking and investment advice including: a claim by a software ‘start up’ for losses due to the wrongful termination of an overdraft facility which settled mid-way through trial; claims for mis-selling of investments in AIG; mis-selling of interest rate hedging products, and mis-selling of tax efficient ‘film funding’ schemes. Defamation/Privacy work includes Cooper v Associated Newspapers ( jury award of £65,000 for an individual accused of masterminding the Millbank riots); Tesla Inc v BBC (CA ) suing Top Gear for mis-representing performance of Tesla Roadster; McAlpine v Bercow (twitter libel); Fox v Boulter (action by former defence secretary); McGrath v Prof Dawkins (defending allegation that D liable for allegation on website); MPS & SOCA v TNL (suing to restrain use by TNL of confidential material in defending a libel claim); Ecclestone v Khyami (privacy claim and dispute over ownership Lambourghini). In addition, undertakes serious and difficult personal injury work, in which regard he has obtained substantial awards for: a teenage girl severely brain damaged after she walked out from behind a parked car outside her school; a boy who suffered serious and permanent burns from electricity arcing to his fishing rod when he trespassed across a railway line, and a man who walked into the path of bus in central London.


Called 1985; QC 2010. Publications of note: ‘How difficult is it to gift a share?’ Shah v Shah [2010] EWCA Civ 1408 Trusts & Trustees 2011 17: 438-440; ‘Separate ways (An examination of the need for an independent tribunal in sporting disciplinary proceedings)’ with John Kenneally, Solicitors Journal 6 April 2010.


Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, Personal Injury Bar Association, Professional Negligence Bar Association, British Association of Sport and the Law, Bar Sports Law Association.


University College Cardiff (LLB Hons).

London Bar

Company and partnership

Within: Company – Leading silks

William McCormick QC - Ely Place ChambersExtremely approachable, efficient and hands-on.

[back to top]

Defamation and privacy

Within: Defamation and privacy – Leading silks

William McCormick QC - Ely Place ChambersClear, concise, quick, and reliable.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Innovation & Thailand 4.0: Value Creation for Business using Trade Secrets

    Thailand 4.0 stands for the new stage to transform the country currently relying on heavy industries (3.0 stage) into a creativity and innovation-driven economy. Trade secrets are definitively value-based and could help pursing Thailand 4.0.
  • Novelties Introduced by the Movable Pledge Law

    As of January 1, 2017, Law No. 6750 on Pledge over Movable Assets in Commercial Transactions (“Movable Pledge Law “), which was enacted on October 20, 2016, entered into force and abolished Law No.1447 on Commercial Enterprise Pledge (“Commercial Enterprise Pledge Law “). The Movable Pledge Law introduces significant changes and offers more practical methods for establishing pledge over movable assets as explained below.
  • Determination of Injury in Anti-Dumping Investigations: Turkey’s Side of the Story

    I - Introduction
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • Turkish Health PPP Projects

    The Turkish health sector has undergone major reforms over the past ten years as part of the health transformation program. The most important pillar of such program has been the development of public-private partnership (“PPP ”) model health campus projects. More than twenty health campus projects with an investment amount of more than € 10 billion have been developed through PPP model in Turkey. They are currently at different stages ranging from tendering to operation, and more than ten health PPP projects are still in the pipeline.
  • Infrastructure REIC: An Alternative Source of Funding for Infrastructure Projects

    With the start of operation in certain BOT and other PPP model infrastructure projects in Turkey, refinancing alternatives have become more attractive and diversified. Capital market instruments and institutions are likely to have a greater share in the refinancings of projects which have become operational and the construction risks have been removed. Over the last few years, the use of capital market instruments in the infrastructure financings have gained a new impetus with the introduction of various incentives and financing solutions in this aspect. Most recently, the removal of the 1/3 and 1/5 bond issuance limits for healthcare PPP projects on 18 February 2017 represented an important step towards incentivizing the use of bonds in the healthcare sector. In line with this overall strategy, the government has also adopted various measures to make the Real Estate Investment Companies (“REICs ”) more attractive for the financing/refinancing of infrastructure projects such as BOT, BLT and other PPP projects.
  • Ankara-Niğde Highway Project

    Tender process for 330 km Ankara-Niğde Highway Project has been launched by the General Directorate of Highways upon publication of the tender announcement in the Official Gazette on December 30, 2016.
  • Establishment of the Natural Gas Spot Market in Turkey

    In line with the government’s objectives to make Turkey a regional hub for natural gas trading, a natural gas spot market has been established by the Natural Gas Organized Wholesale Market Regulation published in the Official Gazette on 31 March 2017.
  • Philippine Court of Appeals Denies Issuance of Environmental Protection Order Against Mining Company

    In a decision issued on March 8, 2017, the Philippine Court of Appeals (CA) denied the petition by NGO Ang Aroroy ay Alagaan, Inc. and certain individuals, for the issuance of a writ of kalikasan against Filminera Resources Corporation, and its directors and officers. The petitioners have claimed that Filminera, which operates in the Philippine province of Masbate, had been causing environmental damage in the conduct of its mining operations in violation of local law, and that a writ of kalikasan should be issued.

    Lis Alibi pendens is Latin for ‘suit pending elsewhere .’ Both Articles 27 and 28 of the EU Regulation 44/2001 regulate the existence of lis alibi pendens and related judicial actions. In particular it is a doctrine that regulates the jurisdictional relationship of courts hearing concurrent proceedings involving the same or related causes of action between the same parties pending in the courts of different Member States.