The Legal 500 > Tooks Chambers (Chambers of Michael Mansfield QC and Patrick Roche) > London, ENGLAND > Lawyer profiles

Tooks Chambers

Chambers of Michael Mansfield QC and Patrick Roche

81 FARRINGDON STREET, LONDON, EC4A 4BL, ENGLAND

Tel:: Work 020 7842 7575
Fax:: Fax 020 7842 7576
DX:: 68 LONDON CHANCERY LANE

Web:: www.tooks.co.uk
Email:

Nicola Braganza

Tel:: Work +44 20 7842 7575
Email:

Position

Discrimination and employment, immigration and asylum, mental health and community care, public and administrative law. Cases include: A v B & C [2010] ET (sexual orientation/ disability discrimination against longest suffering HIV man); Khoja v Metropolitan Police [2009] ET (religious discrimination. Muslim Caterer required to handle pork); Hose Expres Thurrock v Jacomb [2009] LTL 1/4/09 (Disability Discrimination post Malcolm); Parliamentary Comm for Administration v Fernandez [2004] ICR 123 (indirect discrimination); Jayasuriya v Meat Hygiene Service (2) Lincs Turkeys Ltd (2001) LTL (Liability under RRA); Tchoulla v Netto Foodstores ltd (1998) LTL (guidance to tribunals in race discrimination); Morse v Future Reality (1996) ET (downloading of sexually explicit images in workplace, sex harassment); NA & AA (Iraq) v Sec of State [2009] EWHC 420 (Home Office policy on Iraq asylum seekers); Mbanga v S S Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 367 (medical evidence in asylum appeals); SM and Others (Iraq) v SSHD [2005] UKIAT 00111 (Iraqi Kurds Country Guidance case); LW (Cancellation refugee status: UNHCR Note) Ethiopia [2005] UKIAT00042; R (on the application of Adam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWHC LTL; Ala Anufrijeva & Others v London Borough of Southwark [2004] 2 WLR 603 (Guidance on damages under the Human Rights Act); R v (1) SSHD (2) SSWP, ex parte Nadezda Anufrijeva (2003) 3 WLR 252 (meaning of determination in asylum support); R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Consuelo Hashmi (2002) LTL 3/5/2002 (legitimate expectation on grant of ILR); R v (1) Ashworth Special Hospital Authority (2) Secretary of State for Health ex parte N [2001] HRLR 46 (random telephone monitoring in High Security Hospitals).

Career

Called 1992; Middle Temple.

Languages

Bilingual in German, basic French.

Member

ALBA, DLA, MHLA, ILS.

Education

LLB (Honours).

Leisure

Travel, cinema, diving.

Practice Areas

Administrative and public law; Employment

Back to index

Search News and Articles

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.

- Ogier
English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.

- Ogier
Getting the breaks

Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- Falcon Chambers
Product liability and dietary supplements

Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- Shook, Hardy & Bacon International LLP
The calm before  the storm: are  you prepared for  a dawn raid?

WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- WilmerHale
International shipment of waste: transporters beware

Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here

- Burges Salmon LLP
Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.

- Michael Kyprianou & Co
FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.

- Michael Kyprianou & Co
National public order. Adoption of the Draft

The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.

- Lidings Law Firm
China Customs New Interpretation

For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.

- Haoliwen Partners