The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Living Wage
24 THE ROPEWALK, NOTTINGHAM, NG1 5EF, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0115 947 2581
Fax:
Fax 0115 947 6532
DX:
10060 NOTTINGHAM-17
Email:
Web:
www.ropewalk.co.uk

Regional Bar: Midland Circuit

Commercial, banking, insolvency and Chancery law

Key areas of work for Ropewalk Chambers include professional negligence and Inheritance Act disputes, as well as a broad range of general commercial litigation matters.

Leading Juniors

Jonathan Owen - Ropewalk ChambersHis practice includes Chancery, professional negligence, and contractual disputes.

Ranked: tier 2

Stephen Beresford - Ropewalk ChambersHe has experience of a wide range of commercial disputes.

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Costs

At Ropewalk ChambersAndrew Lyons and Andrew Hogan are the key names in costs litigation, taking instructions from solicitors as well as costing services. Issues such as qualified one-way costs shifting, success fees and after-the-event insurance are a particular area of expertise.

Leading Juniors

Andrew Hogan - Ropewalk ChambersA costs specialist.

Ranked: tier 1

Andrew Lyons - Ropewalk ChambersVery technically-minded with a good analytical approach.

Ranked: tier 1

[back to top]

Inquests and inquiries

Notable members of Ropewalk Chambers' inquest team include Richard Seabrook, who is particularly experienced in Article 2 inquests and Georgina Cursham, a member of the Attorney General's Regional Panel.

Leading Juniors

Georgina Cursham - Ropewalk ChambersResponsive, approachable and thorough.

Ranked: tier 1

Richard Seabrook - Ropewalk ChambersParticularly experienced in care home death cases.

Ranked: tier 1

[back to top]

Personal injury

Ropewalk Chambers is 'the premier personal injury set in the East Midlands', with a strong range of specialist counsel available for instruction. Industrial disease is a particular area of specialism, with several tenants acting on high-value mesothelioma claims.

Leading Silks

Jayne Adams QC - Ropewalk ChambersShe provides clear, insightful and incisive advice.

Ranked: tier 1

Patrick Limb QC - Ropewalk ChambersSees the big picture and is great with clients.

Ranked: tier 1
Leading Juniors

Georgina Cursham - Ropewalk ChambersApproachable, professional and knowledgeable.

Ranked: tier 1

Kam Jaspal - Ropewalk ChambersGood on his feet.

Ranked: tier 1

Andrew Lyons - Ropewalk ChambersVery technically-minded with a good analytical approach.

Ranked: tier 2

Andrew McNamara - Ropewalk ChambersHis pleading and advice are excellent.

Ranked: tier 2

Jason Cox - Ropewalk ChambersHe has incredible attention to detail and turns instructions around quickly.

Ranked: tier 2

Richard Gregory - Ropewalk ChambersGoes the extra mile for his clients.

Ranked: tier 2

Phillip Turton - Ropewalk ChambersHe has a sharp eye and a strong knowledge of asbestos claims.

Ranked: tier 3

Rochelle Rong - Ropewalk ChambersKnowledgeable and attentive.

Ranked: tier 3

Toby Stewart - Ropewalk ChambersA personal injury specialist.

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Property

At Ropewalk Chambers, the property team is instructed in a wide range of matters including possession claims, boundary and easement disputes as well as dilapidation claims. Tom Carter recently represented a claimant, as a junior alone, in a Court of Appeal case against National Rail concerning liability under the law of nuisance for encroachment by Japanese knotweed rhizomes.

Leading Juniors

Tom Carter - Ropewalk ChambersParticularly recommended for cases involving Japanese knotweed.

Ranked: tier 1

Andrew McNamara - Ropewalk ChambersAn excellent advocate who has a very good manner with clients.

Ranked: tier 2

[back to top]


Further information on Ropewalk Chambers (Ropewalk Chambers)

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Ropewalk Chambers (Ropewalk Chambers) in other jurisdictions.

Regional Bar

Offices in Nottingham

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has  ‘previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules’,  the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11). 
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS – CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal. The  explanatory notes  to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the  Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002  (“the 2002 Act”). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.