The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Work 020 7822 1200
Fax 020 7822 1300
2TG – 2 Temple Gardens, Lucy Wyles, London, ENGLAND

Lawyer rankings

Lucy Wyles

Work 020 7822 1200
2TG – 2 Temple Gardens (2TG – 2 Temple Gardens)


Lucy practises in personal injury, clinical negligence and insurance. She specialises in personal injury cases and has acted in claims involving catastrophic injuries, fatal accidents, occupational health issues and stress at work. She has considerable expertise in dealing with international claims with an international element.. She is regularly instructed to act in substantial claims resulting from accidents on holiday and in other cases involving jurisdiction and choice of law disputes. Lucy was lead Assistant Editor for the 2nd edition of European Civil Practice (Layton & Mercer), one of the leading textbooks on jurisdiction. Lucy has wide experience not only of claims under the Package Travel Regulations but also in relation to recovery claims from suppliers abroad. Lucy is familiar with the issues arising in choice of law disputes, including the application of the Rome I Regulation and the Rome II Regulation and their predecessors. She has particular experience in jurisdiction and enforcement issues under the Brussels Regulation and otherwise, including disputes as to validity of service; contesting jurisdiction on substantive and procedural grounds; registration and enforcement disputes; and jurisdiction over non-parties. Illustrative cases include: Virgin v BAA and others (2012). Injury during airport wheelchair transfer; Chipperfield v Thomas Cook (2011). Catastrophic injury from balcony collapse in Spanish villa; Hine v Esprit Holidays (2011). Dog-sled accident in Lapland; Kirby v Mancey (2011). Skiing accident in France; Firshman v Thomas Cook (ongoing). Legionnaire’s disease in Mexican hotel; Kurik v VHV (2012) RTA with jurisdiction issues as to both claimant and tortfeasor; Singleton v Union Alcoyana (2011) RTA: stay for parallel proceedings in Spain; Cummings v Allianz (2012). Applicable law issue in respect of Italian accident resulting in brain injury. Lucy has extensive experience of employer’s liability claims including disease (WRULD, deafness, asthma and cancers), manual handling and workplace accidents, stress at work and bullying; occupier’s liability claims; sporting accidents; catastrophic injuries and fatal claims; product liability claims; and direct claims by foreign social insurers. Cases include: Chodkiewicz v Hoistway Ltd (2012) brain injury in lift shaft accident; H v McCormack Ltd (2010) brain injury to cyclist ; A v F (2010) brain injury claim arising from fall into theatre pit. Her clinical negligence experience covers obstetrics and gynaecology (cord prolapse; hypoxia; Erb’s palsy); general surgery; paediatrics; neurology; orthopaedics; MRSA and general practice. Recent cases include: Re AM (2011 – ongoing); onset of cauda equine syndrome in Portugal; Jones v Carmarthenshire NHS Trust [2011]; complications after abdominal surgery; DT v Essex Rivers Healthcare NHS Trust [2010 – settled]; QBD cerebral palsy arising out of perinatal care. Lucy also has experience of insurance disputes arising out of a range of different covers, including policy interpretation; repudiation and avoidance for misrepresentation, non-disclosure and fraud; motor insurance and claims relating to the MIB; property damage claims; direct and recovery actions. Recent cases include: C v Liverpool Victoria [2011 – settled]; alleged fraud in property damage claim ; W v AXA [2010] claim in respect of burglary damage abroad; Danneau v EUI Ltd [2008]; whether policy covered courtesy car; Dempster v Diamond Insurance [2008]; alleged fraud in respect of motor theft claim; Seiffert v Booker QBD [2006]; direct claim by German statutory insurer.


Called 1994; Lincoln’s Inn. Publications: assistant editor ‘European Civil Practice’, Sweet & Maxwell (2nd ed, 2004).


Fluent French, basic German.


Bar European Group; PIBA; LCLCBA; COMBAR.


St Mary’s School, Calne; Merton College, Oxford (1992 MA Hons Jurisprudence); Université Libre De Bruxelles (1993 Licence Spéciale in EC law).


Four children.

London Bar

Personal injury

Within: Personal injury – Leading juniors

Lucy Wyles - 2TG – 2 Temple GardensParticularly recommended for travel litigation.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • New requirement for all issuers operating on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange

    On 10 August 2017 the Luxembourg Stock Exchange announced that all domestic and foreign issuers operating on the regulated market (Bourse de Luxembourg) or on the multilateral trading facility (Euro MTF) of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange must provide their legal entity identifier (“LEI ”) codes to the Luxembourg Stock Exchange before 15 September 2017.
  • Luxembourg law on the exploration and use of space resources entered into force

    The Luxembourg law on the exploration and use of space resources of 20 July 2017 entered into force on 2 August 2017 and placed Luxembourg among the most innovative space-oriented nations in the world.
  • VAT in the GCC – Q&A updates from the UAE Ministry of Finance

    On 9 July the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Finance (MOF) published an update of the Value Added Tax (VAT) FAQ section of its website.
  • PRIIPs KID: The final pieces of the puzzle

    The pieces of the puzzle are finally falling into place. The long-awaited level 3 and 4 measures have been published earlier this week, half a year before the PRIIPs KID becomes compulsory.
  • MiFID II: Further guidance on product governance requirements

    Amongst the numerous topics covered by the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has decided to provide further guidance on the requirements regarding product governance through its guidelines dated 2 June 2017 which focus on the target market assessment by manufacturers and distributors of financial products.     
  • Arendt & Medernach is again the “Luxembourg Tax Firm of the Year”

    The partners of Arendt & Medernach are pleased to announce that their firm has been awarded once again the prestigious “Luxembourg Tax Firm of the Year” title during the International Tax Review’s European Tax Awards ceremony held at the Savoy Hotel in London on 18 May.
  • Signature of the Multilateral instrument – reservations made by Luxembourg

    On 7 June 2017, the official ceremony for the signing of the multilateral instrument (“MLI”) took place bringing to a close a process initiated last year when a consensus was reached on the wording of the MLI on 24 November 2016 (see also our newsflash dated 2 December 2016, available on our website section Publications/Newsflash).
  • Arendt & Medernach: Luxembourg Law Firm of the Year

    Luxembourg, May 2017 – Arendt & Medernach is proud to have been named “Luxembourg Law firm of the year” both by Chambers & Partners and IFLR (International Financial Law Review). The prestigious trophies were both received in April in London at the respective ceremonies of the Chambers Europe Awards 2017 and the IFLR European Awards 2017.
  • First VAT EU case law on the cost-sharing VAT exemption

    The question of the scope of the cost-sharing VAT exemption, also referred to in the Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 as amended ("EU VAT Directive") as “Independent Groups of Persons” or “IGPs”, is currently being debated at the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) in several cases. Last Thursday marked the first milestone regarding this specific VAT exemption since the CJEU released its judgment in the case Commission v Luxembourg (C-274/15).
  • An Introduction to Corporate Guarantee

    In the UAE, the risk management activities inherent in running a corporate or investment banking business remain of crucial importance, not least because of the strong local characteristic of “name lending”, by which is meant lending or providing other banking facilities to family or other private businesses, primarily on the strength of the “name” or “names” of the proprietors standing behind the business, rather than on the strength of the asset quality and underlying credit of the particular business. Of course, in practice, there is commercial overlap between the proprietors and the companies which they own, but the credit analyses can break down where poor banking practices and procedures result in poorly constructed legal documentation and gaps in guarantee and security support documents.