The Legal 500

Chambers of Richard Stead

101 VICTORIA STREET, BRISTOL, BS1 6PU, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0117 923 4700
Fax:
Fax 0117 929 4821
DX:
743350 BRISTOL 36
Web:
www.stjohnschambers.co.uk
Email:

Andrew Marsden

Tel:
Work +44 117 923 4700
Email:
St John's Chambers (Chambers of Richard Stead)

Position

Barrister specialising in company, partnership, agency and commercial litigation. He is also an experienced CEDR trained mediator. His practice covers contractual disputes of all types, company law (all areas, including matters relating to directors' duties, shareholder disputes, share capital, minority shareholder protection, the capacity and constitution of companies and the liability of companies and their officers), all disputes relating to partnerships and between agents and their principals with a particular emphasis on the law relating to commercial agents). Andrew is 'a commercially focussed barrister' who is 'very in-tune with the needs of his commercial clients.' He has 'in-depth expertise in corporate, partnership and commercial law disputes'. His approach is considered 'sensible, very clear and extremely helpful.' He has an 'unfailingly commercial approach and excellent cross-examination skills'. An 'extremely articulate and forceful advocate', 'one of the best pound-for-pound commercial barristers in town'. 'Tenacious and thoughtful' and possessed of 'great people skills', solicitors appreciate his 'close, hands-on involvement in cases' and his 'clear, incisive advice'. Commended for his 'client-friendly manner' and 'trenchant advice and assiduous approach', it has been said that 'he has an air of gravitas about him, and a good manner with clients. I think he will make a very good judge one day.' He is 'extremely thorough in preparation, and provides an excellent standard of service', 'gives good advice and follows it through' and is 'an excellent, commercially minded advocate who should go to the top'. He is a 'deeply impressive barrister who prepares fully, is fantastic with documents and is commercially minded', 'is excellent on his feet' and 'leaves no stone unturned'.

Career

Called 1994; formerly a solicitor with Freshfields. Andrew Marsden's practice continues to be dominated by heavy commercial disputes. Andrew's services have been in constant demand over the last year placing him firmly in the top flight of specialist commercial barristers in the West Country. Cases include: Jefferson v Bailey (a claim in respect of the alleged misappropriation of substantial funds from a property development company; Graham Sykes Ltd v Transactor Global Solutions Ltd (a substantial damages claim following the failure of a software company to provide complex computer software); Penton Salisbury Ltd v Peugeot Motor Company Plc (acting for Peugeot in a dispute arising out of its termination of a main dealer agreement); Heron Properties v Permaban Ltd (a contractual dispute between a property developer and a contractor over the laying of a floor in a shopping mall); Walton Design Limited v Marco Trading Limited (a contractual dispute between a women's clothing retailer and a garment manufacturer involving complex issues as to losses); Allen-Britten v Abels (a dispute regarding the sale and purchase of a boat used as a floating restaurant). Publications: "Commercial Agents", Case and Statute Citator (May 2009), "Shareholder Protection from Unfair Prejudice", Case and Statute Citator (March 2009).

Member

Commercial Bar Association; Chancery Bar Association.

Education

University of Oxford (BCL; LLB Business Law, first class Hons); CEDR Trained Mediator.

Leisure

Skiing, the piano, triathlon and cognac.

Practice Areas

Commercial; Company; Partnership

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.