The Legal 500

Stone Chambers

Chambers of Elizabeth Blackburn QC and Vasanti Selvaratnam QC

Work 020 7440 6900
Fax 020 7242 0197
London, Singapore
Stone Chambers (Chambers of Elizabeth Blackburn QC and Vasanti Selvaratnam QC), Dominic Happé, London, ENGLAND

Lawyer rankings

Dominic Happé

Work 020 7440 6900
Stone Chambers (Chambers of Elizabeth Blackburn QC and Vasanti Selvaratnam QC)


Dominic Happé’s practice focuses on all aspects of international trade, particularly shipping (both dry and wet) and commodities, as well as ship sale and purchase and shipbuilding. He acts in arbitration, in the Commercial Court and in the Court of Appeal. He has wide experience in interlocutory applications, particularly anti-suit injunctions. He advises on all aspects of his practice, including the drafting of large scale commodity, mining and mineral exploitation contracts. Dominic is particularly experienced in assisting in devising and co-ordinating an effective strategy over multiple jurisdictions. Cases of interest include: OMV v Vector [2014] Lloyd’s Rep. Plus 31 – dispute over recovery of customs penalties paid the opposing party had been engaged in the circumvention of EU anti-dumping penalties and the origin of the goods was concealed; The ‘Bulk Chile’ [2012] 2 Lloyds Rep 594 – the first case to consider the interrelationship between a notices/rights of lien and notices/rights of interception of freight; Christian D [2011] ILPr 38: anti-suit injunctions; whether or not a declaratory arbitration award is enforceable; Easybiz Investments v Sinograin & Anor ‘The Biz’ [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 688: cargo claim, breach of arbitration agreement; Novasen v Alimenta [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 390: commodities; FOSFA Appeal; The “Kallang” No. 2 [2009] 1 Lloyd’s Rep.124; The “Duden” [2009] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 145: anti-suit injunction; scope of arbitration agreement and anti-suit relief in the context of arrest proceedings; Samsun Logix v Oceantrade [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 450: shipping; nature of lien over sub-hire; interrelation of lien and arbitration award.


Called 1993; Gray’s Inn.


Latin, Greek, French.


Corpus Christi College, Oxford (Literae Humaniores).


Cricket, wine, MCC.

London Bar


Within: Commodities – Leading juniors

Dominic Happé - Stone ChambersUnusual in his keen understanding of commercial issues.’

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars 2016

    Managaing Intellectual property has come up with its  IP Stars  2016  guide on Patents and Trademarks & Copyright and has recozined its senior practitioners under the following categories:
  • Anand and Anand recognized in Asia-Pacific Innovative Lawyers 2016 report

    Anand and Anand has been recognized amongst the FT25 Asia Pacific Headquartered law firms in the FT Asia-Pacific Innovative Lawyers 2016 Report. 
  • BASCAP 25 Best Practices

    ANAND AND ANAND convened a meeting with the ICC and BASCAP officials on 17th May 2016 for assessing the BASCAP 25 Best Practices vis-a-vis the level of copyright and trademark enforcement and protection in India. The discussion panel involved representatives from leading brands and Mr. Pravin Anand who suggested inputs to the proposed document. The document will be submitted to the Indian Government ahead of the BRICS Summit in October 2016.

    Yuliya Chumachenko, Partner, AEQUITAS Law Firm
  • Austria: Shareholder Agreements - Back to Normal?

    On 1 January 2015 the act to amend regulations for partnerships, as defined under the Austrian Civil Code (GesbR-Reformgesetz – GesbR-RG, BGBl I 83/2014), entered into force. read more...
  • Czech Republic: New developments in contract registration

    The brand new Contract Register Act came into effect on 1 July 2016 (the Act). After 1 July 2016, contracts concluded with certain subjects, such as the state (the Czech Republic), state fund, etc., need to be published in the register of contracts (the "Register").If a contract is not published in the Register within three months of its conclusion, it is considered invalid from the outset (as if the contract was never concluded). read more...
  • What businessmen should know about legislative changes with major and interested transactions?

    It is well known that before making significant managerial decisions, the general director must obtain approval from the shareholders or the board of directors. Apart from that, if a director is personally interested in entering into a transaction, approval is also required to proceed with the transaction. In the absence of such an approval, the transaction can be challenged and, in certain circumstances, invalidated. In order to minimize such risks and to eliminate legal uncertainty for the parties to the transaction, the rules governing major transactions and interested transactions must be sufficiently clear. Previously, however, the application of these rules was associated with a large number of controversial legal issues, which were finally solved as a result of the legislative amendments, which will enter into force on January 1, 2017. According to the new amendments, the distinction between major and non-major transactions has been delineated more clearly, parties have been allowed more flexibility in relation to approving transactions, the burdensome obligation to obtain prior approval of interested transactions has been abrogated, and finally the procedure for challenging transactions in question has been made much more complex. Overall, the changes should have a positive influence on business, as they contribute to the establishment of firm legal certainty in this area of the law. 
  • Are you up to date on important Polish labour law matters?

    As an employer it is vital that you are informed on new labour law related issues that could negatively affect your organisation. In this legal insights we explore a number of these important legal points. read more...
  • A Maltese Solution for Swiss Asset Managers

    Until very recently the Swiss asset management industry relied exclusively on self-regulation and was allowed to operate and develop somewhat independently from European regulation. It is now confronted with major regulatory changes which will align Swiss laws and regulation with AIFMD and MIFID. Gone are the days where Swiss asset managers could be independent and unregulated. Swiss asset managers will now be subject to EU-like forms of authorisations and prudential supervision which will have a transformative impact on the Swiss asset management industry and bring additional costs, most notably compliance and operational costs, which will invariably adversely affect smaller independent asset managers.

    BY: Sidharth Goyal & Anita Aswal