The Legal 500

4 PAPER BUILDINGS, TEMPLE, LONDON, EC4Y 7EX, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7643 5000
Fax:
Fax 020 7353 5778
DX:
1036 LONDON/CHANCERY LANE
Web:
www.hailshamchambers.com
Email:

Hailsham Chambers offers clients top quality legal advice and advocacy across its focused and complementary areas of practice. Established more than 100 years ago and located at the heart of London’s legal community, the set’s leading reputation gives clients confidence that they are instructing some of the very best practitioners available.

The set: Acting for claimants and defendants in the areas of: professional negligence, clinical negligence, professional discipline, costs litigation, personal injury and commercial dispute resolution, many of the set’s members have significant experience in more than one field, offering clients rare cross-disciplinary expertise.

Chambers strives to provide the highest possible standards and recognises the individual needs of clients. Flexibility, transparency and open communication fosters close working relationships which result in clients returning to Hailsham if legal expertise is required again. A progressive and friendly set, Hailsham has embraced technologies that provide clients with pro-active, accurate and timely service.

Types of work undertaken: Hailsham offers advice and representation before all levels of courts and tribunals throughout the world, in matters which are funded privately, by Legal Aid or CFA. In addition to representing parties in arbitrations and mediations, several members of Chambers are also available for appointment as neutrals. Core practice areas include: Professional negligence – Hailsham’s sought-after, 40-strong professional negligence group has extensive experience of complex claims relating to all the main professions. Members of the group are instructed by leading insurers and firms.

Clinical negligence – Chambers’ medical law group comprises almost 30 members and is widely recognised in relation to high-value, specialist medical litigation. Members act for patients, trusts, healthcare professionals, health authorities and pharmaceutical companies and also chair inquiries and appear at inquests.

Professional discipline – Hailsham has a successful regulatory and disciplinary group. The team offers advice and advocacy before tribunals and regulatory bodies, both medical and non-medical. Members advise doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals and are involved in the conduct of disciplinary procedures. They frequently appear in the GMC, GDC and NMC and in the Administrative Court for judicial reviews, public inquiries and inquests.

Costs litigation – Chambers’ costs group has impressive expertise in this specialist area of practice. Acknowledged leaders in this field, members of the group have appeared in many of the most important costs cases.

Personal injury – Chambers’ personal injury group has an enviable reputation in high-value litigation, with an emphasis on claims arising from injuries at work, road traffic accidents, traumatic brain and catastrophic spinal injuries. Hailsham has strong relationships with a number of unions and professional bodies and undertakes a significant volume of claimant work. In defence work, Chambers has good connections with many of the leading insurers.

Commercial dispute resolution – Chambers’ commercial group advises and acts in a range of matters including agency, banking and financial services, carriage by land and sea, competition law, environmental law, conflicts of law, construction, entertainment, fraud, international sales, IT and a range of domestic and foreign commercial agreements.

Above material supplied by Hailsham Chambers ().

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HOUSING

    In Nzinga Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 the Court of Appeal clarified that in offering a homeless person with alternative temporary accommodation the local authority is obliged to point that if the offer is refused it has discharged its Part VII duties under the Housing Act 1996.
    - 11KBW
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue: