The Legal 500

Chambers of Alan Boyle QC

6 NEW SQUARE, LINCOLN'S INN, LONDON, WC2A 3QS, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7242 6105
Fax:
Fax 020 7405 4004
DX:
1025 LONDON CHANCERY LANE WC2
Web:
www.serlecourt.co.uk
Email:

Serle Court is a set of barristers’ chambers offering genuine expertise across a broad range of both Chancery and commercial disciplines – in effect, Serle Court covers the whole range of what might be termed ‘business’ law, from offshore litigation about the world’s largest companies to domestic advice on probate matters, servicing a similarly disparate lay and professional client base at home and abroad.

The set: Widely recognised as one of the top sets at the English Bar, Serle Court is recommended in 20 different areas of practice by legal directories. Serle Court is also one of the largest commercial Chancery sets, with 53 members, including 17 silks, and as such is well-placed to offer the right barrister (or team) for each case – something upon which Serle Court prides itself, and just one facet of its commitment to exceptional service.

Types of work undertaken: Across a broad range of practice areas, Serle Court provides an equally wide range of services. The needs of the modern client have long been more extensive than merely drafting, advising and litigating – needless to say, Serle Court offers all those services, but Serle Court has also positioned itself in the vanguard of the ADR revolution, with an unusually large number of highly regarded mediators and arbitrators, as well as many members with extensive experience of appearing in such alternative dispute resolution forums.

Serle Court’s core practice is litigation: it can provide bright and effective barristers at all levels to conduct all types of business litigation and is experienced at putting together streamlined and powerful teams of counsel for some of the largest cases in the world. In recent years these have included: Alhamranhi in Jersey, the Weissfisch litigation in the Bahamas and in England the Lexi fraud case, the Fiona litigation, the Lehman brothers administration and the BTA bank litigation.

The members are also very often instructed on opposite sides of the same case – in some cases in recent years, all barristers on all sides have been from Serle Court. Serle Court understands the overwhelming need for confidentiality in such cases and has put in place effective systems to ensure the separation of clerking and document handling, so that clients may be confident that their interests are protected.

Although Serle Court is a leading commercial Chancery set, it also undertakes a significant amount of advisory work, across the whole range of practice areas. Because members appreciate both the practical and business realities of legal problems, they aim to provide clear and imaginative solutions, and helpful advice – even if it is not always positive! As a matter of course, Serle Court will aim to suggest barristers capable of responding effectively to demands for urgent advice if the case requires it and offer document transmission by email.

Serle Court’s work is by no means limited to the courts of England and Wales and domestic tribunals. A very significant proportion of work originates overseas: Serle Court has particularly close relationships with professional clients in the Channel Islands and the Caribbean, but members also advise and appear in proceedings in the European courts, as well as in (amongst others) Anguilla, Bahamas, Barbados, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Hong Kong, Ireland, Isle of Man, Israel, Italy, Jersey, Liechtenstein, Middle East, New South Wales, Norway, Panama, Russia, Saint Kitts & Nevis, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the US.

In consequence, many members of Serle Court are very experienced in working closely with lawyers from different jurisdictions, and, when appropriate, will happily travel abroad to see clients. They can adopt a hands-on approach to foreign litigation, either on the ground or from London, as the case requires.

The main areas of work include: arbitration, mediation, banking, Chancery, civil fraud, commercial litigation, company, financial services, insolvency, insurance and reinsurance, partnership and LLPs, professional negligence, property, sports, entertainment and media, and trusts and probate.

Above material supplied by Serle Court (Chambers of Alan Boyle QC).

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HOUSING

    In Nzinga Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 the Court of Appeal clarified that in offering a homeless person with alternative temporary accommodation the local authority is obliged to point that if the offer is refused it has discharged its Part VII duties under the Housing Act 1996.
    - 11KBW
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue: