The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of Alastair Wilson QC and Roger Wyand QC

Work 020 7404 0404
Fax 020 7404 0505

Nicholas Caddick QC

Work 020 7404 0404
Hogarth Chambers (Chambers of Alastair Wilson QC and Roger Wyand QC)


Barrister specialising in (1) intellectual property – copyright, designs, trade marks, breach of confidence; (2) contractual disputes – particularly with regard to IT and media disputes; (3) conflict of laws and jurisdiction; (4) breach of fiduciary duty; (4) insolvency – including director’s disqualification; (5) property law – particularly mortgages, easements and construction disputes; (6) probate and succession. IP cases include: Stretchline v H&M [2015] EWCA Civ (settlement agreements, striking out defence and counterclaim asserting invalidity of patent); A v B (2015) (parties’ identities confidential) (Luxury Goods and perfumes – dispute as to the scope of trade mark rights under a licence agreement); Victoria Plumb v Victorian Plumbing (2015) (trade mark dispute; adwords); Joules v Brand Auth (2014) (enforcing IPR in the designs of clothes); Getronics v P&O Ferries (2014) (contractual dispute over a substantial IT contract); Hewlett Packard v K2 (2014) (interim relief in trade mark parallel importation case); America’s Collectibles v Genuine Gemstone (2014) (dispute as to title to patent); Odeon Cinemas v Odeon Entertainment (2014) (trade mark dispute over trading names); C Plc v P [2006] Ch 549 (privilege against self-incrimination in relation to search orders); O Ltd v Z [2005] EWHC 238 (privilege against self-incrimination in relation to search orders); Badfinger Music v Evans [2002] EMLR 2 (fiduciaries; equitable remuneration); Attorney General v Times Newspapers [2001] 1 WLR 885 (CA) (confidential information and newspapers). Chancery cases include: Elmbid v Burgess [2013] EWHC 1489 (contractual dispute; notice to complete); Fortune v Wiltshire Council [2013] 1 WLR 808 (CA) (highways); Re Minrealm [2012] EWHC 343 (companies; valuation of shares; consent orders); Official Receiver v Huck [2011] BPIR 702 (insolvency; cross border jurisdiction); Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission v Beasley [2011] 1 WLR 1704 (CA) (nature of debt in an IVA); Alkin v Raymond [2010] WTLR 1117 (replacement of executor/trustees); Official Receiver v Mitterfellner [2009] BPIR 1075 (insolvency; cross border jurisdiction); Secretary of State v Hollier [2006] BCC 11 (disqualification of directors; de facto directors); Secretary of State v Feakins [2007] BCC 54 (CA) (transactions defrauding creditors);Re Huddersfield Fine Worsted [2005] BCC 915 (CA) (insolvency; priorities of debts in administration); Re Timothy [2006] BPIR 329 (insolvency; IVAs); Colin Dawson Windows v King’s Lynn and West Norfolk BC [2005] 2 P&CR 19 (CA) (adverse possession); Scottish Widows v Tripipatkul [2004] BCC 200 (liability of surety under lease); P&S Platt v Crouch [2004] 1 P&CR 18 (CA) (easement of mooring); Green v Lord Somerleyton [2004] 1 P&CR 33 (easement of drainage; nuisance; flooding); Re Marann Brookes [2003] BCC 239 (insolvency; cross border jurisdiction); Malory Enterprises v Cheshire Homes [2002] Ch 216 (CA) (overriding interests in land, rectification of the register); Tracs v Sampson [2001] EWCA Civ 1388 (appointment of receivers); Hale v Norfolk County Council [2001] Ch 717 (CA) (highways).


Called 1986, Middle Temple. Publications: (1) co-editor Copinger & Skone James on Copyright (formerly Specialist Editor on designs); (2) co-author Caddick & Longstaff ‘A User’s Guide to Trade Marks and Passing Off’ 4th ed. (2015). (3) Former editor of Williams Mortimer & Sunnuck’s Executors, Administrators and Probate 18th – 20th eds.


Intellectual Property Bar Association; Chancery Bar Association; Non-Contentious Probate Rules Working Group.


Alton College, Hampshire; St. Edmund Hall, Oxford (1984 BA Jurisprudence, 1985 BCL; MA).


Horse riding and rugby.

London Bar

Intellectual property

Within: Intellectual property – Leading silks

Nicholas Caddick QC - Hogarth ChambersHe is clever, measured and calm, with excellent legal analysis.

Within: Intellectual property

Considered to be ‘excellent on all IP issues’, Hogarth Chambers is a ‘first-rate, highly respected set’ with ‘real strength in depth for patents, trade mark and copyright work’. The set is recognised for its ‘responsiveness’, ‘pragmatic advice’ and for ‘getting results in high-profile cases’. Several members, including Nicholas Caddick QC and Andrew Norris, acted in Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H M Hennes & Mauritz Ltd, a contract and patent dispute before the Court of Appeal. The set also boasts ‘strong’ silks and ‘excellent juniors for trade mark matters’, with Michael Hicks and Thomas St Quintin securing instructions in Beverly Hills Polo Club v Santa Monica Polo Club, which involved a claim for infringement of a registered mark, passing off and breach of contract.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Consolidated Group (Income Tax) Rules, 2019

    On 31 May 2019, Malta published the “Consolidated Group (Income Tax) Rules". The rules will come into force as from year of assessment 2020 and the rules introduce the concept of fiscal units into Maltese tax law .
  • Renewable energy in Ukraine: green auctions launched

    In the first half of 2019 alone, renewable energy facilities with a capacity of more than 1.5 GW were connected to the Ukrainian grid, with about 96% of those being solar and wind energy facilities. In the whole of 2018, which has been a record-breaking year so far, numbers were almost half as high. The Ukrainian market also remains very attractive to foreign investors, not least because of the lucrative feed-in tariff rates, which are paid out regularly. Now, after the adoption of the so-called law on green auctions, significant changes can be expected.
  • Economic Substance Requirements - Fund Managers

    The International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Law, 2018 (the “ES Law”) came into effect in the Cayman Islands on 1 January 2019, requiring in-scope entities that carry on particular activities to have demonstrable economic substance in the Cayman Islands.
  • Shipping at the spotlight of terrorism

    Is terrorism the new norm for shipping?
  • Adidas three stripe Trademark Revocation

    In a judgment of the General Court of the European Union of the 19th June 2019, Adidas saw their hopes of extending their three stripes trademark dashed, as the court ruled that there was no distinctiveness in the three stripes trademark. Furthermore, the court held that the Adidas had failed to prove that the mark had acquired distinctive character through use throughout the member states of the EU.
  • David against Goliath – Libra vs Central Banks: Who will win?

    Working in the crypto and DLT space is like being on an emotional rollercoaster with feelings which range from curiosity, excitement, euphoria, revelation, shock, disappointment, hope, wonder and determination – did I miss any?
  • UK Telecoms company fined £100K over unsolicited marketing messages

    The Information Commissioner’s Office (‘ICO’) which is the UK’s data protection supervisory authority, recently issued a fine of £100,000 to EE Limited, a telecoms company operating in the UK. The fine was issued in response to EE Limited having sent two and a half million unsolicited direct marketing messages to its customers, back in early 2018. The direct marketing messages were sent without EE Limited having first obtained the required consent to send them to its clients.
  • British Airways and Marriott International Inc. face huge fines from UK data protection authority

    British Airways (‘BA’) may be hit with what will be the highest-ever penalty which the Information Commissioner’s Office (‘ICO’), the UK’s data protection supervisory authority, has handed out.
  • UAE Tax domicile certificate

    Issued by the Ministry of Finance in the United Arab Emirates (‘UAE’), the Tax Domicile Certificate (also referred to as the Tax Residency Certificate) enables eligible government entities, companies and individuals to take advantage of double taxation avoidance agreements on income signed by the UAE.
  • The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017

    The following information relates to the enactment of The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017 (" DPL "), which was expected to come into force on 29 January 2019, will now come into force in September 2019. The DPL will regulate the future processing of all personal data in the Cayman Islands.