The Legal 500

18 Red Lion Court

Chambers of Max Hill QC

LONDON, EC4A 3EB, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7520 6000
Fax:
Fax 020 7520 6248/9
DX:
478 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Web:
www.18rlc.co.uk
Email:
London, Chelmsford

David Walbank

Tel:
Work +44 20 7520 6000
Email:
18 Red Lion Court (Chambers of Max Hill QC)

Position

David Walbank is standing counsel to the Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office. He is instructed in the most serious, complex and sensitive prosecutions and has immense experience and proven expertise in the trial of serious and complex fraud and serious organised crime. In addition to David's work for the Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office, he has been regularly briefed by the Serious Fraud Office and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. He has extensive experience in conducting the 'heaviest' and most demanding fraud cases, as well as a significant appellate practice (in both the Court of Appeal Criminal Division and the Divisional Court) and has appeared in the House of Lords. He regularly advises and makes submissions on novel or complex points of law and is invariably entrusted by RCPO with responsibility for the conduct of its highest-profile cases, viz. those with reputational consequences for that department. David has developed a particular expertise in confiscation proceedings and is equally at home with contested and complex factual issues or with the more arcane points of law and procedure. He appeared in the House of Lords in the seminal case of Soneji [2006] 1 AC 340 and has argued confiscation points in the Court of Appeal on a number of occasions. He acted as moderator at several of the CBA's training sessions for barristers on the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Equally, David's expertise on disclosure issues is widely recognised. In July 2004 he drafted the 'Protocol For National MTIC Diclosure Exercise', which was issued by RCPO to all prosecution teams, defence teams and judges in more than 60 pending MTIC prosecutions and continues to be used in all such cases. What has become known as the 'Walbank Protocol' has been approved in a number of first instance rulings and in the Court of Appeal. The CBA treated it as a model for criminal disclosure in its submissions on the Fundamental Legal Aid Review. Whilst the majority of David's work in recent years has been for prosecution authorities, he has also excelled in defending such cases and in the conduct of civil fraud litigation.

Career

Called 1987; Inner Temple. Regularly lectures to lawyers and law enforcement officers; provides strategic advice for general policy applications; and conducted (with Professor David Ormerod) a series of seminars on the Fraud Act 2006 and on different routes to non-jury trial (jury-tampering, sample counts and the 'burdensome trial' provisions). David wrote the original chapter on disclosure in 'Fraud: Law, Practice and Procedure' (1st ed, 2004 Butterworths).

Practice Areas

Crime - corporate; Environment; Fraud: crime

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.