The Legal 500

Chambers of Orlando Pownall QC

TEMPLE, LONDON, EC4Y 7BH, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7353 5324
Fax:
Fax 020 7353 0667
DX:
444 LONDON CHANCERY LANE WC2
Web:
www.2harecourt.com
Email:

Described by The Legal 500 as ‘a set of choice for many solicitors for a range of general as well as high-profile and complex crime’ and by Chambers UK Guide as a set which ‘stands out for offering a high level of consistency and expertise’ and as ‘the set providing all the best people for high-profile criminal cases’, 2 Hare Court has been recognised consistently as one of the UK’s leading chambers specialising in criminal law, fraud, regulatory work and other related fields.

The set: Chambers comprises 55 tenants including 17 Queen’s Counsel, three Senior Treasury Counsel, one Junior Treasury Counsel, three deputy High Court judges and 15 members who sit as recorders. Many former members of chambers have become judges. Chambers provides counsel of first choice to leading defence firms as well as principal prosecuting authorities in London, nationwide and abroad. It has a proven track record of delivering the highest standards of service to clients, together with excellence in advocacy and trial management in cases of the utmost gravity and complexity. In 2008 the set was recognised as ‘Crime Set of the Year’ and Orlando Pownall QC as ‘Crime Silk of the Year’ in the Chambers & Partners Bar Awards.

Types of work undertaken: Crime: the strength and depth of experience amongst the set’s specialist advocates enables chambers to defend and prosecute in all types of criminal work, particularly more serious and complex matters such as murder, terrorism (including special advocate work in closed proceedings), international drug and human trafficking, corruption, serious organised crime and sexual offences. Examples include Delroy Grant (‘night stalker’); Saudi Prince murder; Jill Dando murder; Damilola Taylor murder; Dhiron Barot (Al Qaeda dirty bomb attack plan); Omar Khyam (terrorist fertilizer bomb plot); Suffolk Strangler, London 7/7 bombings; Home Secretary v AF (terrorist control orders case); Heathrow bombers; Goren, Goren & Goren (honour killing); Ali Dizaei (Metropolitan Police commander case); and the MPs’ and Lords’ expenses cases.

Fraud and corporate crime: the set is routinely instructed in large and complex fraud and financial crime cases. Examples include: Kent Pharmaceuticals, the Darwin canoeist case, Lord Rodney Bank fraud, Regent Commodities and the British Airways pricefixing case. Members have significant experience of restraint, confiscation, asset recovery, cash forfeiture and other proceedings under POCA. They are now also instructed in appeals before the VAT Tribunal arising out of fraud and alleged criminal conduct. Members are regularly instructed in criminal cases brought by the FSA (market abuse, etc).

Professional discipline: the set has an established and expanding team, applying their long experience of high quality advocacy in criminal courts. It has significant expertise in healthcare regulation, appearing in proceedings before the GMC, GDC, GOC, HPC, GSCC and NMC, both presenting on behalf of the regulator and defending individual practitioners. It is also involved in disciplinary proceedings involving the police, accountants and actuaries, solicitors and barristers. Members are increasingly instructed in telecommunications regulation and in the regulation of football, rugby, horse racing and cricket.

Financial regulation: dovetailing members’ experience of serious and complex financial crime and professional disciplinary proceedings, members are regularly instructed to advise and act for firms and individuals working in the financial services sector. Advisory work often includes potential liability under the criminal law in parallel with regulatory breaches of FSMA 2000, eg insider dealing, market abuse, fraud and the withdrawal of authorisation of professionals.

Other areas: members are also recognised by the directories for their work in environmental and licensing law, and are frequently instructed in health and safety and corporate manslaughter matters. A number of members of chambers are authorised to receive instructions through the Bar Council’s Public Access and Licensed Access schemes.

International: members are frequently instructed in complex and high-profile cases in other jurisdictions including Ireland, mainland Europe, Hong Kong and the Caribbean. Languages spoken include French, Spanish, Greek, Urdu, Hindi, Punjabi and Russian.

Above material supplied by 2 Hare Court (Chambers of Orlando Pownall QC).

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HOUSING

    In Nzinga Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 the Court of Appeal clarified that in offering a homeless person with alternative temporary accommodation the local authority is obliged to point that if the offer is refused it has discharged its Part VII duties under the Housing Act 1996.
    - 11KBW
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue: