The Legal 500

Doughty Street Chambers

53-54 DOUGHTY STREET, LONDON, WC1N 2LS, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7404 1313
Fax:
Fax 020 7404 2283
DX:
223 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Web:
www.doughtystreet.co.uk
Email:
Manchester, London, Bristol

Robin Oppenheim QC

Email:
Doughty Street Chambers ()

Position

Robin Oppenheim was appointed as Queen's Counsel from 16 October 2006. Robin is a specialist in the fields of clinical negligence, product liability and personal injury work. He has been involved in a significant number of liability and quantum claims of maximum severity clinical negligence and PI over the past 18 months: he has achieved approximately £54 million in damages for personal injury and clinical negligence claimants this year over 15 serious injury cases (last calendar year approximately £40 million over 11 cases). He has achieved significant liability and discounted quantum settlements in catastrophic injury personal injury and clinical negligence claims over the last year. Examples include: CD -v- Birmingham City Council - a personal injury claim by young man against local authority relating to a fall in a council flat resulting in tetraplegia under the Defective Premises Act 1972 raising novel and difficult questions of law. Discounted liability settlement, having rejected previous nuisance offer; MG -v- Dr S: Clinical negligence claim by child for failure to refer his mother to hospital with a hidden bleed leading to cerebral palsy with profound brain damage. Exceptionally complex obstetric and neonatal expert evidence issues which had defeated previous solicitors, counsel and experts, leading to a £3.5m settlement (discounted settlement figure from full value for liability risks) days before trial; CC -v- Prof C - a clinical negligence claim by a young man with a spinal tumour where internationally recognised consultant neurosurgeon rendered him tetraplegic in the course of surgery which had hitherto been vigorously defended. Liability conceded shortly prior to trial. The focus of Robin's practice in the field of clinical negligence continues to be high value catastrophic brain and spinal injury for children and adults with a particular focus on complex obstetric, neonatal, paediatric and spinal claims. He has developed an expertise in meningitis and meningococcal disease litigation. He currently has one case before the Court of Appeal on this topic and in 2009 and 2008 won two first instance liability trials in this area. He is currently instructed in a case due for hearing before the Court of Appeal in April 2011 in a ground breaking challenge to the way causation is determined in cases where referral of the claimant is delayed to a third party health care provider. In the field of personal injury his work concentrates on severe brain and spinal injury claims, with a particular focus on innovative approaches to quantification, periodical payment and community care issues. He led for a number of the claimants in the landmark Thompstone ASHE 6115 indexation litigation both on appeal and at first instance. He was previously involved in landmark quantum cases such as Heil -v- Rankin (general damages) and Warren -v- Northern General Hospital NHS Trust (discount rate). He is regularly instructed for his expertise on issues relating to periodical payments and community care issues. As identified above he has secured large settlements in the past 18 months in personal injury work. In the field of product liability and group action work he has been involved in many of the major group action product liability claims over the last decade both as a leader and junior: fetal anti-convulsant litigation (to 2009), haemophilia litigation (settled 2010), Northwick Park litigation (settled 2008), dopamine agonist litigation (settled 2008), MMRII, Alder Hey and nationwide organ retention litigation, oral contraceptive pill litigation among others. He is currently advising in claims arising out of stem cell therapy by MS sufferers. He is also instructed in food poisoning litigation claims.

Career

Called 1988; Middle Temple; QC 2006. Publications of note: He is the main contributor to the Damages section in the APlL Personal lnjury Law, Practice and Precedents and Personal lnjury Manual, Jordans. He wrote the section on multi-party actions in Bullen, Leake and Jacob, Sweet and Maxwell, 2007 and will be doing so for the forthcoming edition. He is a contributing author to the PIBA Personal Injury Manual 2007.

Member

Member of Justice, AvMA, PIBA, PNBA, Amnesty.

Education

Acland Burghley, London; Manchester University (1985 BA First Class, Politics and Modern History); Westminster University (1986 DipLaw).

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.