The Legal 500

Doughty Street Chambers

53-54 DOUGHTY STREET, LONDON, WC1N 2LS, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7404 1313
Fax:
Fax 020 7404 2283
DX:
223 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Email:
Web:
www.doughtystreet.co.uk
Bristol, London, Manchester
Doughty Street Chambers, Amal Clooney, London, ENGLAND

Lawyer rankings

Amal Clooney

Tel:
Work 020 7404 1313
Email:
Doughty Street Chambers (Doughty Street Chambers)

Position

Amal specialises in public international law, human rights, international criminal law and extradition. She represents clients before international courts, including the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, and domestic courts in the UK and the US. Alongside court work, she provides advice to governments and individuals on legal issues in her areas of expertise. Her case profile includes representing Mohamed Fahmy (an Al-Jazeera English journalist detained in Egypt following an unfair trial) and Abdullah al Senussi (former Libyan intelligence chief before the International Criminal Court in Hague), as well as the Kingdom of Cambodia before the International Court of Justice and the government of Armenia, intervening in European Court of Human Rights proceedings. Amal is currently a visiting professor at Columbia Law School, where she co-teaches the Human Rights course with Professor Sarah Cleveland. Amal served as a senior advisor to Kofi Annan when he was the UN’s Envoy on Syria. She also served as Counsel to the UN Inquiry on the use of armed drones led by the special rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights. She is a member of the UK’s team of experts on preventing sexual violence in conflict zones and she was recently appointed to the UK Attorney General’s expert panel set up to advise and represent the UK government in cases involving public international law. Prior to joining the London Bar, Mrs Clooney worked in The Hague with various UN-sponsored justice mechanisms, including the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. She is also admitted to the New York bar and practiced as a litigation attorney at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in New York. She speaks English, French and Arabic.

Career

Called 2010, Inner Temple.

Languages

French, Arabic.

Member

International Bar Association; International Law Association; British Institute of International and Comparative Law; International Human Rights Lawyers Association; Bar Human Rights Committee; Chatham House.

Education

Oxford University (St Hugh’s College) (BA, Jurisprudence); New York University School of Law (LLM).



Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Korea strengthens taxation on multi-national enterprises in 2017

    On July 28, 2016, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance (“MOSF”) announced the annual proposal to amend the tax law for 2017 (the “Proposal”). The Proposal was submitted to the National Assembly on 2 September 2016.
  • Protecting the ‘Little-Guy’ in Distributorship Arrangements in Korea

    - Enforcement Decree to the Fair Retail Agency Transactions Act
  • Single Continuous Infringement Concept and the Practice of the Turkish Competition Authority

    The concept of a single continuous infringement (" SCI ") enables competition authorities to consider a series of agreements or conducts that have the same objective to distort competition in the market as one single continuous infringement. Similar to the approach in the European Union, the Turkish Competition Authority ( Authority ) also considers this concept while assessing a case under Article 4 of Law No 4054 on the Protection of Competition of 13 December 1994 ( Law No 4054 ), which is akin to-if not the same as-Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( TFEU ).
  • Broader Interpretation Boosts Anti-Avoidance Rules

    Businesses seeking to structure cross-border transactions in ways that help them avoid paying tax are finding it more difficult as authorities worldwide step up information sharing. One such example is the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, which is driven by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and has 135 members. The cabinet recently approved Thailand's membership in the forum.
  • Austria: Amendments to Gas Market Model Ordinance

    The Gas Market Model Ordinance plays a major role in the Austrian gas market, as it regulates network access and the capacity management and balancing system in Austria's three market areas: the east, Tyrol and Vorarlberg. read more...
  • [South Korea] Data Privacy Legal Update

    Proposed Amendment to the Enforcement Decree of PIPA
  • Applications under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 - a practical update

    New Zealand’s overseas investment regime has been in the media spotlight in recent times. While lobbying organisations and political parties closely scrutinise the decisions of the Overseas Investment Office ( OIO ), those in the investment community have raised concerns that the regime is overly burdensome and time consuming. Against this background, there have been a number of changes in process and regulation, with further changes in the pipeline, aimed at ensuring the regime is fit for purpose. This article provides a brief overview of the regime and then looks at some of the recent and impending developments.  
  • Arbitrators’ Liability: Austrian Supreme Court Reconfirms Strict Standards

    One of the main advantages of arbitration vis-à-vis state court litigation, is that the parties are free to choose independent and highly specialised experts to decide their cases. Yet, if these experts negligently (or even deliberately) violate the duties that come with the acceptance of the appointment, the issue of liability arises. read more...
  • On Gifts, Courtesies and Other Business Amenities

    Nurlan Sholanov Partner, AEQUITAS Law Firm
  • Promissory Note Holders Not Bound by Arbitration Clause in Underlying Contract

    This update discusses the recent case of  Rals International Pte Ltd v Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza SpA  [2016] SGCA 53 where the Singapore Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court that the assignee’s claim based on a number of promissory notes did not fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement in the underlying Supply Agreement. The assignee of such notes was therefore free to litigate in the courts.