The Legal 500

Doughty Street Chambers

53-54 DOUGHTY STREET, LONDON, WC1N 2LS, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7404 1313
Fax:
Fax 020 7404 2283
DX:
223 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Web:
www.doughtystreet.co.uk
Email:
Manchester, London, Bristol

Aswini Weereratne

Email:
Doughty Street Chambers ()

Position

Aswini specialises in mental health and healthcare law, including in particular, capacity and best interests, human rights and tort actions against public authorities including social services and the police. She is also experienced in community care and prison law. Her practice encompasses both public and private law. She regularly appears in the Court of Protection instructed by the Official Solicitor, local authorities and other individuals, dealing with issues of health and welfare, and has co-authored a text on the Mental Capacity Act 2005. She is often invited to lecture and write on both the Mental Capacity and Mental Health Acts and human rights. She has made successful applications to the European Court of Human Rights. She also has long experience of inquests and inquiries. Since 1996 has been engaged as chair in six independent homicide inquiries commissioned by various health authorities and has been counsel in a number of other inquiries relating to mental health care and treatment (including Ashworth Special Hospital Inquiry, 1998). Reported cases include: Hillingdon v Stephen Neary (by his litigation friend) and Mark Neary [2011] EWHC (COP) : case involving an incapacitated adult deprived of his liberty under the MCA and an application by the press to attend the hearing; AH v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] UKUT 264 and [2011] UKUT. A successful application seeking a public hearing before the First Tier Tribunal. Test under MHA 1983 and Article 6 clarified; AB and others v Nugent Care society: Institutional abuse multi party action. Physical and sexual abuse of boys in children's homes during the 1970s and 80s by staff leading to psychiatric damage especially post traumatic stress disorder: [2006] EWHC 2986; [2009] EWHC 4812; [2010] PIQR P3 (CA) and most recently [2010] EWHC 1005 (QB): two claimants won damages after trials on limitation and liability; LBE v SK and others [2008] EWHC 636. Welfare of incapacitated adult of Afghani origin. Issues of care, residence, sexual contact and marriage; E v Channel 4 and News International Limited [2005] EWCH Fam. Acted for defendants to resist an attempt to restrain broadcast of a TV programme about the care and services provided for an incapacitated woman with multiple personalities; R(IH) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for Health and others [2004] AC. House of Lords. Acted for patient unable to take advantage of a decision of the Mental Health Review Tribuanl to discharge him from high secure hospital for lack of community services.

Career

Called 1986; Gray's Inn; full time practice at the Bar since 1991. A part-time legal member of the Mental Health Review Tribunal (Southern Region) (now First-Tier Tribunal (Mental Health)) since 2001. Appointed an independent adjudicator for the Legal Services Commission in the area of institutional abuse in 2008. Various appointments to chair homicide inquiries. Publications of note: 'Limitation in historic child abuse cases post Hoare - the cart before the horse' PI Focus, December 2010, AplL; 'Safeguards for informal patients', Journal of Mental Health Law, 20 (2010) 71. Special issue on 'A model law fuidng incapacity and mental health legislation - is it viable; is it advisable?'; chapter on Mental Health in Crime and Human Rights. Published by OUP in December 2009; co-author of Butterworth's 'New Law Guide to the Mental Capacity Act 2005' published in April 2008; six Homicide Inquiry reports; consultant editor, 'Halsburys Laws of England, Mental Health' volume for publication in 2006, 'LexisNexis' Butterworth's; contributor to: 'International Criminal Court's Trust Fund for Victims. Analysis and options for the development of further criteria for the operation of the trust fund for victims.' A discussion document. Published by Redress, Dec 2003.

Member

AVMA, MIND, LAG, Association of Prison Lawyers.

Education

Ursuline Convent School; Sussex University (BSc Hons); City University (DipLaw); School of Oriental and Asian Studies, London University (LLM International Human Rights).

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.