The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of Richard Lynagh QC

2 CROWN OFFICE ROW, TEMPLE, LONDON, EC4Y 7HJ, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7797 8100
Fax:
Fax 020 7797 8101
DX:
80 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Email:
Web:
www.crownofficechambers.com

John Greenbourne

Tel:
Work 020 7797 8100
Email:
Crown Office Chambers (Chambers of Richard Lynagh QC)

Position

Barrister specialising in professional negligence (chiefly concerned with insurance services, legal advice, property valuation and construction and clinical treatment), general commercial, insurance and reinsurance, personal injury. Cases include: Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2017] EWCA Civ 314, [2017] PNLR 27 (when appellate court can interfere with lower court’s findings of fact; whether claim for loss of chance of compensation if original claim dishonest);  Procter v Raleys Solicitors [2015] EWCA Civ 400, [2015] PNLR 24; (extent of duty of solicitors acting for large number of claimants under occupational disease scheme;  HLB Kidsons v Lloyd’s Underwriters [2008] EWCA Civ 1206, [2009] Lloyd’s IR 178; [2009] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 8 (timing of notification of claims and whether condition precedent – accountants suing professional indemnity insurers, brokers and solicitors after insurers refused to indemnify in respect of claims in respect of failed tax avoidance schemes); Lindsay v Wood The Times 08.12.06 [2006] EWHC 2895 (QB) (test of mental capacity to conduct claim for personal injury and manage the resultant fund); Skipper v Calderdale MBC [2006] EWCA Civ 238 [2006] ELR 322 (whether claim should be summarily dismissed, educational negligence); Bankers Insurance v South [2004] Lloyd’s IR 1 (whether holiday policy covered liability for jet ski accident, notification term a condition precedent, effect of unfair terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1994, whether breach of condition precedent entitled insurers to avoid in absence of prejudice); Wong v Parkside NHST [2003] 3 All ER 932 (CA) (whether common law tort of harassment; requirements for tort of intentional infliction of harm); Phelps v Hillingdon LBC [2001] 2 AC 619 (liability of LEA and educational psychologist to dyslexic pupil); Norglen v Reeds Rains Prudential [1999] 2 AC 1 (assignability of cause of action by company to legally aided individual); Kincardine Fisheries v Sunderland Marine Insurance (CA) The Times 12.02.97 [1998] CLY 3363 (construction of fish farm insurance policy; claim against brokers and insurers); Theodore Goddard v Fletcher King [1997] 2 EGLR 131 (liabilities of solicitor and surveyor for drafting defective lease); X v Bedfordshire CC [1995] 2 AC 633 (duties of care owed by statutory authorities and professional employees); Ezekiel v McDade [1995] 2 EGLR 107 (CA) (measure of general damages against residential property surveyors); Slade v Adco The Times 07.12.95 (CA) and Draper v Ferrymasters [1993] PIQR P356 (CA) (dismissal of personal injury claims for want of prosecution); Suttle v Simmons [1989] 2 Lloyd’s 227 (PC) (extent of insurers’ liability under compulsory motor insurance legislation).

Career

Called 1978; Gray’s Inn (Holt Scholar).

Member

London Common Law and Commercial Bar Association; Professional Negligence Bar Association; Personal Injuries Bar Association.

Education

St Paul’s School; Trinity College, Cambridge (MA).


London Bar

Insurance and reinsurance

Within: Insurance and reinsurance – Leading juniors

John Greenbourne - Crown Office ChambersVery easy to deal with and gets to the meat of the issues quickly.

[back to top]

Personal injury, industrial disease and insurance fraud

Within: Personal injury – Leading juniors

John Greenbourne - Crown Office ChambersHe is relentless in his pursuit of the right outcome and confronts the difficult issues.

[back to top]

Professional negligence

Within: Professional negligence – leading juniors

John Greenbourne - Crown Office ChambersHe is exceptionally clever and has a great eye for detail; he leaves no stone unturned.

Within: Professional negligence

Crown Office Chambers is highly regarded for its construction-related professional negligence experience, and is also active across claims involving insurance brokers, IFAs, auditors, lawyers, independent financial advisers, engineers, valuers, quantity surveyors and architects. Acting on both sides, Ben Quiney QC is leading James Sharpe against John Greenbourne in Perry v Raleys, a series of claims arising from the alleged under-settlement of miner’s VWF claims.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017

    The following information relates to the enactment of The Cayman Islands Data Protection Law, 2017 (" DPL "), which was expected to come into force on 29 January 2019, will now come into force in September 2019. The DPL will regulate the future processing of all personal data in the Cayman Islands.
  • The Mutual Funds Law (2019 Revision)

    The following information relates to the enactment of The Mutual Funds Law (2019 Revision) and the subsequent commencement of related sections of The Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law 2015. The changes require certain funds to notify the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority if they are active in EU jurisdictions.
  • Stuarts Success - Case Review: Toby -v- Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company

    Toby –v- Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, FSD 152 of 2013 (IMJ), Judgment delivered on 29 August 2018
  • Security Token Offerings in the Cayman Islands

    Security Token Offerings (“STOs”) are an extremely popular means of fundraising for new projects and utilise blockchain technology to do so. Whilst no specific legislation has been passed by the Cayman Islands Government in connection with STOs and cryptocurrencies, it would be incorrect to say that STOs are “unregulated”.
  • "BLACK FRIDAY" - NOW FREELY USABLE FOR PROMOTIONS IN AUSTRIA

    Black Friday is unquestionable one of the most profitable and busiest days of the year for retail, particularly online. Worldwide almost all online store do offer sales or special promotions on Black Friday or Cyber Monday. Already after this practice has established online, a trademark for " BLACK FRIDAY " was registered in Germany back in 2013. In 2016 a Chinese company acquired the trademark and then filed in 2017 for its extension to Austria. Based on the registered trademark, it granted exclusive rights to an Austrian company, which licensed usage rights to various partner stores against remuneration. Further, an exclusive " Black Friday-Cooperation Program " was established. Non-partners who used the event name or trademark were prosecuted and requested to either pay a license fee or refrain from running Black Friday promotions. Some followed the request and entered into license agreements. Some, however, did challenge the validity of the trademark. Finally, respective proceedings to check the actual protection of the trademark were initiated. Austrian courts now held that the trademark " BLACK FRIDAY " is not protected in Austria .
    - Dorda
  • The Zero Carbon Bill - a closer look

    ​​​​The long-awaited "Zero Carbon Bill" was finally released on 9 May, but despite being greeted by considerable media interest there are a number of significant issues that have yet to come to the fore.
  • A link tax in New Zealand?

    ​​​​A controversial payment to publishers for content in Europe has implications for New Zealand – despite escaping mention in a recent paper that set out the key issues for review for our own copyright laws.
  • News media exemption under the Privacy Act: now a matter of "responsibility"?

    The role of the news media as the "eyes and ears" of the public, and the corresponding right of such news media to be exempted from the Privacy Act 1993 ( Privacy Act ), is entrenched and well accepted. However, the extent to which the news media exemption applies to non-traditional forms of "news" published by "civilian journalists", such as online commentary and blogs, is a hotly debated subject.
  • Quarterly Update on Trade Defense Cases in Turkey (June 2019)

    The authority to initiate dumping or subsidy examinations, upon complaint or, where necessary, ex officio , has been given from the Ministry of Economy to the Ministry of Trade ("Ministry"). Within the scope of this authority, the Ministry announces its decisions with the communiqués published on the Official Gazette.
  • Company Formations - A jurisdictional guide to setting up a business

    The following article contains the Foreword in the IR Global Virtual Series brochure on 'Company Formations - A jurisdictional guide to setting up a business'.