The Legal 500

Chambers of Andrew Caldecott QC

TEMPLE, LONDON, EC4Y 9BY, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7353 8845
Fax:
Fax 020 7583 9144
DX:
LDE 468
Web:
www.onebrickcourt.com
Email:

Andrew Caldecott QC

Tel:
Work +44 20 7353 8845
Email:
1 Brick Court (Chambers of Andrew Caldecott QC)

Position

Specialises in defamation, privacy, breach of confidence, contempt of court and media law generally. Frequently advises clients in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore. Recent cases include: Spiller v Joseph (Supreme Court – libel – representing media interveners); Batturina v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA – libel); Ajinomoto v Asda (CA malicious falsehood – Supreme Court granted permission to appeal); R v Morley & ors (CA reporting restrictions – MP’s expenses trial); Dee v Telegraph (libel); Horlick v Associated Newspapers (libel – meaning); Shovell & anor v Adventis Group plc & anor (libel); Budu v BBC (libel); North London Central Mosque v Policy Exchange & anor (libel); Sir Stelios Haji-Ionnou v Dixon & Regus Group (libel); AG v MGN Ltd (contempt); Bray v Deutsche Bank AG (libel); Tesco Stores Ltd v Guardian Newspapers (libel, offer of amends); Dahlan v Al Jazeera Satellite Television (libel); Bond v BBC (libel); Briscoe-Mitchell v Briscoe and Hodder and Stoughton (libel); V M Morrisons v Office of Fair Trading (libel); Martinez v Associated Newspapers (privacy); Dahl v Northern and Shell (data protection, passing off); R v VAC (ex parte BBFC) (judicial review); Moyes v Rooney and Harper Collins (libel); British Board of Film Censorship v The Video Appeals Committee (judicial review); Jeynes v News Group Newspapers (CA libel-meaning); Sir Martin Sorrell & anr v FullSix & ors (libel and privacy); X & Y v Person Unknown (privacy); The Law Society v Department of Constitutional Affairs (Civil Procedure Rules); AG v Pelling (contempt); Armstrong v Times (CA – qualified privilege); Henry v BBC (trial justification and qualified privilege); A v B and C (privacy injunction); AG v Express (contempt); Strachan v Gleaner Co Ltd (Privy Council – qualified privilege); Green Corns Ltd v Claverley Group Ltd (privacy); Naomi Campbell v MGN (House of Lords – privacy/confidence); Bonnick v The Gleaner Company (Privy Council – libel); King v Telegraph (libel/CFAs); Greene v Associated Newspapers (libel injunctions); Armstrong v Times Newspapers (libel); Kearns v General Council of the Bar (libel qualified privilege); the Hutton Inquiry; Lord Ashcroft v Foreign Office (confidence and data protection); Lord Foster v Associated Newspapers (libel); Mawdsley v Guardian Newspapers (libel offer of amends); Blue Underground v British Board of Film Censorship (obscenity); MacIntyre v Kent Police (libel); Alan Campbell v News Group Newspapers (libel damages appeal); Attorney General v Mirror Group Newspapers (Leeds footballers aborted trial) – contempt; Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research (libel qualified privilege); Carlton Television v News Group Newspapers (libel – justification); Attorney General v Manchester Evening News (re: Thomson and Venables – contempt); MacIntyre v Chief Cons of Kent; Venables v News Group Newspapers (confidence injunction to protect identity of Jamie Bulger’s killers); In Re: X v Y (confidence injunction to protect Mary Bell); Attorney General v BBC (contempt); other cases include: Reynolds v Times Newspapers; Taylor v SFO; Tsikata v News Group Newspapers; Clare v Mirror Group Newspapers; Regan v Taylor.

Career

Qualified 1975, Inner Temple; QC 1994, Bencher 2004; head of chambers since 2007.

Education

Eton College; New College, Oxford.

Practice Areas

Defamation and privacy; Media and entertainment

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to