The Legal 500

Chambers of Andrew Caldecott QC

TEMPLE, LONDON, EC4Y 9BY, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7353 8845
Fax:
Fax 020 7583 9144
DX:
LDE 468
Web:
www.onebrickcourt.com
Email:

One Brick Court is a leading set of chambers specialising in media and information law. The set is recognised as a leader in the fields of defamation, privacy, confidence, malicious falsehood, freedom of information, data protection, contempt, reporting restrictions, harassment, and all media related law.

The set: One Brick Court has been a leading specialist in libel since the 1880s. Many eminent libel lawyers and judges have been members, including Sir Gerald Slade, Sir Neville Faulks, Colin Duncan QC, Sir Brian Neill, Sir David Hirst, Sir David Eady, Dame Victoria Sharp and Edward Garnier QC MP, the solicitor general.

Members of chambers act for corporate, media and individual claimants and defendants, as well as government departments, local authorities, NGOs and trades unions. Members appear in all divisions of the High Court, the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and Privy Council. Members also appear before professional, disciplinary and regulatory tribunals (including the First Tier and Upper Tribunals, Ofcom and sports disciplinary tribunals), as well as arbitrations and mediations. Members of chambers make representations on reporting restrictions and other media-related issues in all tribunals, including the criminal and family courts, coroners’ courts and employment tribunal. Chambers regularly receives instructions from solicitors worldwide, including Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong.

Members of One Brick Court combine the highest standards of legal learning, experience and practical judgement with able and committed advocacy (both jury and appellate). Members write and contribute to leading works on media law, including Halsbury’s Laws (Libel and Slander), Duncan and Neill on Defamation, Bullen & Leake & Jacob’s Precedents of Pleadings, Carter-Ruck on Libel and Privacy, Atkins Court Forms on Defamation, Confidence, Privacy, Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Regulation of Investigatory Powers.

One Brick Court won ‘Set of the Year’ for Defamation/Privacy at the Chambers Bar Awards in 2006, 2007 and 2009. Andrew Caldecott QC (2005, 2007 and 2009) and Richard Rampton QC (2006) have both won ‘Silk of the Year’ and in 2008 Catrin Evans won ‘Junior of the Year’.

Chambers prides itself on being a modem and friendly set with an approachable and efficient clerking team.

Types of work undertaken: Chambers has been instrumental in the development of privacy law and the development of free speech under the Human Rights Act, with members appearing in many of the leading cases in this developing area, notably Naomi Campbell v MGN Ltd, Cream Holdings v Banerjee, and Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers, Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd, Reynolds v Times Newspapers, and Jameel v WSJE. Members in the past year have acted in many of the high-profile media law case, including Spiller v Joseph, Butturina v Times News, HEFCE v IC and Guardian News & Media, R v Morley & ors, R v Ofcom (ex parte Gaunt), Flood v Times Newspapers, Ajinomoto v Asda.

As well as defamation and privacy/breach of confidence, members deal with data protection, freedom of information, contempt, media reporting restrictions in criminal and civil cases, harassment, malicious falsehood, negligent mis-statement, obscenity laws and censorship and all claims relating to the tension between the rights to reputation and privacy and freedom of expression. Related human rights issues are handled, together with judicial review.

Members offer a fast and competitive pre-publication advice service, for which they are able to receive instructions directly from media clients and can provide out-of-hours and weekend cover for urgent injunctions.

Above material supplied by 1 Brick Court (Chambers of Andrew Caldecott QC).

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HOUSING

    In Nzinga Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 the Court of Appeal clarified that in offering a homeless person with alternative temporary accommodation the local authority is obliged to point that if the offer is refused it has discharged its Part VII duties under the Housing Act 1996.
    - 11KBW
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue: