The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Queen Square Chambers

Chambers of Charles Row

56 QUEEN SQUARE, BRISTOL, BS1 4PR, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0117 921 1966
Fax:
Fax 0117 927 6493
DX:
7870 BRISTOL
Email:
Web:
www.queensquarechambers.co.uk
Bristol, Cardiff

Regional Bar: Western Circuit

Clinical negligence

Queen Square Chambers is home to Joanna Lewis and Lauren Seager, both of whom represent claimants across a range of clinical negligence instructions including surgical negligence, primary care failures, and failure to provide alternative treatment. Lewis recently represented a claimant who alleged that negligent administration of anaesthetics left her with feeling during a c-section procedure, which continued despite her crying in pain, and for which the anaesthetic and surgical notes contradicted each other. Former head of chambers Christopher Taylor was appointed a District judge in 2018.

Leading Juniors

Joanna Lewis - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Builds rapport with clients and fights their corner where necessary. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 2

Lauren Seager - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Recommended for a variety of claimant matters. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 2

[back to top]

Crime

Queen Square Chambers provides expertise in all areas of criminal law, for both prosecutors and defence solicitors. Fraud remains a key area of work for the set, with Charles Row and James Tucker prosecuting in carbon credit fraud case. Robin Shellard prosecuted a man for historic sexual offences against three stepdaughters.

Leading Juniors

Charles Row - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė He is able to connect with the jury even in the most difficult of cases. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 1

Robin Shellard - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė An excellent all-round barrister. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 1

David Maunder - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė A skilled and effective communicator, both in and out of court. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 2

James Tucker - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Particularly recommended for fraud or drug-related cases. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 3

[back to top]

Employment

Members of Queen Square Chambers are instructed on behalf of both respondents and defendants at both first-instance and appellate stages. Particular areas of expertise include disability discrimination and constructive dismissal. James Bromige represented the respondent school in a multi-faceted claim by a former teacher, who accused the trust of religious discrimination, constructive dismissal, and protected disclosure detriments, where the claimant is alleged to have bullied and misgendered a transgender student. Kerry Gardiner departed the set in June 2019 for Guildhall Chambers.

Leading Juniors

James Bromige - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Very Thorough and an excellent advocate. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 1

Mark Williams - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Acts for claimants and respondents in a wide range of employment cases. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 2

Mike Blitz - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Very bright and easily deals with complex and sensitive issues. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 2

[back to top]

Family and children law

Care specialist Richard Carron is the key name in family law at Queen Square Chambers, with a practice including vulnerable parents and non-accidental injuries. Ian Halliday has also appeared in several complex care cases recently, in addition to private law and financial remedy instructions.

Leading Juniors

Ian Halliday - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Active in a wide range of family law work. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 4

Richard Carron - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Particularly active in non-accidental injury cases. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 4

[back to top]

Leading Sets
Leading Sets - ranked: tier 2

Queen Square Chambers

[back to top]

Personal injury

Following the departure of former head of chambers Christopher Taylor to sit as a district judge, Joanna Lewis and Lauren Seager are now the key practitioners for personal injury work at Queen Square Chambers. The set's members are predominantly instructed on behalf of claimants, with employer's liability claims a particular area of specialism for chambers.

Leading Juniors

Joanna Lewis - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Pragmatic and well prepared. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 2

Lauren Seager - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė Highly experienced in a wide range of claimant personal injury matters. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 2

[back to top]

Regulatory, health and safety, and licensing

Oliver Willmott is the key figure for regulatory and health and safety cases at Queen Square Chambers and is particularly experienced in maritime cases, as well as regulatory prosecutions involving the Water Industry Act. Wilmott was recently instructed in a private prosecution of a metal plating company by Severn Trent Water, following allegations that the company had discharged trade effluent which exceeded legal limits.

Leading Juniors

Oliver Wilmott - Queen Square Chambers ‚Äė He has an excellent command of the facts and exercises great judgement when advising clients. ‚Äô

Ranked: tier 1

[back to top]


Further information on Queen Square Chambers (Chambers of Charles Row)

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Queen Square Chambers (Chambers of Charles Row) in other jurisdictions.

Regional Bar

Offices in Bristol and Cardiff

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.