The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon


Chambers of Nigel Lickley QC

Work 020 7583 8055
Fax 020 7353 6271
3PB (Chambers of Nigel Lickley QC), Stuart Kennedy, London, ENGLAND

Lawyer rankings

Stuart Kennedy

Work 020 7583 8055
3PB (Chambers of Nigel Lickley QC)

Work Department

Technology and Construction


Specialist construction barrister who is also a chartered surveyor and chartered arbitrator.

Practices in the UK, the Caribbean and internationally as an arbitrator, mediator and conciliator. Regularly sits as an adjudicator mediator, conciliator and experienced in early neutral evaluation and expert determination. Has wide experience in international projects including in Hong Kong, Greece, Cyprus, Norway, Jamaica and Trinidad.

Recent cases include:

  • Acting for successful claimant in a two-week arbitration in Hong Kong against the Hong Kong Government, value £1m;
  • Appointed by the Department of Health to undertake an Early Neutral Evaluation on a £60m dispute between a contractor and an NHS Trust on a PFI project;
  • Acting for a local authority in a two week arbitration in UK successfully defending a £1.5m claim by a contractor;
  • Advising a Housing Association in Northern Ireland in an arbitration brought by a contractor; acting as mediator in a £1.2m dispute between a property company and a developer;
  • Advising a developer on a potential £3m claim against a large Housing Association in London;
  • Advising on potential claims against contractor and sub-contractors arising out of a £15m refurbishment of a former Embassy in London;
  • Acting for a national railway company in UK and successfully defending several very large claims in Adjudication;
  • Sitting as sole arbitrator appointed by the ICC in Paris in a telecoms dispute; sitting as an arbitrator in a multimillion-Euro land dispute in Cyprus;
  • Sitting as sole Arbitrator on a dispute between an Architect’s practice and Government Department;
  • Sitting as arbitrator in a dispute over work on a private house in Mustique; sitting as sole arbitrator in a dispute on a major hotel project in Trinidad.

Reported cases:

  • Acting for the respondant in a £1m arbitration;
  • Brothers & ors v Galliard Docklands Ltd & ors [2001] EWHC 1722 (TCC);
  • Woodlands Oak v Conwell [2011] EWCA Civ 254;
  • Vision Homes Ltd v Lancsville Construction Ltd [2009] EWHC 2042 (TCC) (04 August 2009);
  • Sinclair v. Woods of Winchester Ltd No 2 (2006) 109 Con LR 14;
  • Patinae Contracting Ltd v Park Lane Estates [2006] All ER (D) 186 (Jan), [2005] EWHC 919 (TCC)
  • Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd and Ronald Harrison [2005] All ER (D) 194 (Jul), 102 ConLR 127
  • Allen Wilson Shopfitters and Builders Ltd v Buckingham [2005] EWHC 1165 (TCC), 102 ConLR 154;
  • Trustees of the Stratfield Saye Estate v AHL Construction Ltd [2004] EWHC 3286 (TCC), [2004] All ER (D) 77
  • Allscan Services Ltd v Dougland Support Services Ltd [2003) EWCA Civ 61, [2003] All ER (D) 199 (Jan)
  • Glencot Development and Design Co Ltd v Ben Barrett & Son (Contractors) Ltd [2001] BLR 207, 80 ConLR 14.

Called 1999; Lincoln’s Inn.


Deputy district judge; the Eastern Caribbean Bar Association; fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors; fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; freeman of the Worshipful Company of Arbitrators Member of TecBar and the Society of Construction Law.


Stoneham Grammar School, Reading, Berkshire; First Class Honours Degree in Law (LLB), Thames Valley University, 1997 Very Competent in Bar Finals, Inns of Court School of Law, 1999 Barstow Scholar for achieving third highest marks in Bar Finals.


Cricket, cars, fishing.

London Bar


Within: Construction – Leading juniors

Stuart Kennedy - 3PBMeasured and pragmatic.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Innovation & Thailand 4.0: Value Creation for Business using Trade Secrets

    Thailand 4.0 stands for the new stage to transform the country currently relying on heavy industries (3.0 stage) into a creativity and innovation-driven economy. Trade secrets are definitively value-based and could help pursing Thailand 4.0.
  • Novelties Introduced by the Movable Pledge Law

    As of January 1, 2017, Law No. 6750 on Pledge over Movable Assets in Commercial Transactions (“Movable Pledge Law “), which was enacted on October 20, 2016, entered into force and abolished Law No.1447 on Commercial Enterprise Pledge (“Commercial Enterprise Pledge Law “). The Movable Pledge Law introduces significant changes and offers more practical methods for establishing pledge over movable assets as explained below.
  • Determination of Injury in Anti-Dumping Investigations: Turkey’s Side of the Story

    I - Introduction
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • Turkish Health PPP Projects

    The Turkish health sector has undergone major reforms over the past ten years as part of the health transformation program. The most important pillar of such program has been the development of public-private partnership (“PPP ”) model health campus projects. More than twenty health campus projects with an investment amount of more than € 10 billion have been developed through PPP model in Turkey. They are currently at different stages ranging from tendering to operation, and more than ten health PPP projects are still in the pipeline.
  • Infrastructure REIC: An Alternative Source of Funding for Infrastructure Projects

    With the start of operation in certain BOT and other PPP model infrastructure projects in Turkey, refinancing alternatives have become more attractive and diversified. Capital market instruments and institutions are likely to have a greater share in the refinancings of projects which have become operational and the construction risks have been removed. Over the last few years, the use of capital market instruments in the infrastructure financings have gained a new impetus with the introduction of various incentives and financing solutions in this aspect. Most recently, the removal of the 1/3 and 1/5 bond issuance limits for healthcare PPP projects on 18 February 2017 represented an important step towards incentivizing the use of bonds in the healthcare sector. In line with this overall strategy, the government has also adopted various measures to make the Real Estate Investment Companies (“REICs ”) more attractive for the financing/refinancing of infrastructure projects such as BOT, BLT and other PPP projects.
  • Ankara-Niğde Highway Project

    Tender process for 330 km Ankara-Niğde Highway Project has been launched by the General Directorate of Highways upon publication of the tender announcement in the Official Gazette on December 30, 2016.
  • Establishment of the Natural Gas Spot Market in Turkey

    In line with the government’s objectives to make Turkey a regional hub for natural gas trading, a natural gas spot market has been established by the Natural Gas Organized Wholesale Market Regulation published in the Official Gazette on 31 March 2017.
  • Philippine Court of Appeals Denies Issuance of Environmental Protection Order Against Mining Company

    In a decision issued on March 8, 2017, the Philippine Court of Appeals (CA) denied the petition by NGO Ang Aroroy ay Alagaan, Inc. and certain individuals, for the issuance of a writ of kalikasan against Filminera Resources Corporation, and its directors and officers. The petitioners have claimed that Filminera, which operates in the Philippine province of Masbate, had been causing environmental damage in the conduct of its mining operations in violation of local law, and that a writ of kalikasan should be issued.

    Lis Alibi pendens is Latin for ‘suit pending elsewhere .’ Both Articles 27 and 28 of the EU Regulation 44/2001 regulate the existence of lis alibi pendens and related judicial actions. In particular it is a doctrine that regulates the jurisdictional relationship of courts hearing concurrent proceedings involving the same or related causes of action between the same parties pending in the courts of different Member States.